Cited by 38Aging, Health, and DisabilityTechnology Use by Older AdultsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Phone Therapy Outreach for Blind Elderly

Evans, R. L., Jaureguy, B. M.·1982·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Self-help groups of elderly persons who had been blind for several years met by phone for short-term problem solving and discussion of coping methods. Task-centered assignments helped the majority meet their goal of decreasing feelings of hopelessness and increasing social activities outside of the home. Improved affect and development of new social role skills were attributed to the brief intervention. The key clinical implication is to emphasize outpatient rehabilitation follow-up using cognitive behavioral techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/22.1.32

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the telephone-based group therapy study, no effect was observed on depressive symptoms.

    “No effect was observed on depressive symptoms.”
  • A telephone-based group therapy that taught older people how to cope with their blindness was reported to increase numbers of social activities and reduce levels of loneliness among participants compared with controls at eight weeks.

    “A telephone-based group therapy that taught older people how to cope with their blindness [73] was reported to increase numbers of social activities and reduce levels of loneliness amongst participants in comparison with controls at eight weeks.”
  • Thirteen out of 19 (68%) group interventions in this review had a positive effect on at least one of the four social health sub-domains.

    “Thirteen out of 19 (68%) group interventions in this review [13,53,55,60,63,66-69,73-76] had a positive effect on at least one of the four social health sub-domains.”
  • All interventions delivered by counsellors and by students reported at least one beneficial effect.

    “All interventions delivered by counsellors [53,54,73] and by students [59,66,71,78] reported at least one beneficial effect”
  • Thirteen out of 15 (87%) interventions categorised as having a theoretical basis reported beneficial effects on at least one outcome domain compared with 10 out of 17 (59%) studies categorised as having no theoretical basis.

    “Thirteen out of 15 (87%) interventions categorised as having a theoretical basis reported beneficial effects on at least one outcome domain [13,53-55,59,65,67-69,73-75,81] compared with 10/17 (59%) studies categorised as having no theoretical basis [52,56,60,63,66,70,71,76,78,79].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, R. L., & Jaureguy, B. M.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
1982-02-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
32-35
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2140410855
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
telephone therapy, self-help groups, coping, hopelessness, social activity, cognitive behavioral therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Blindness, Female, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Brief, Self-Help Groups, Telephone, Washington

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review