The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Aging Mind: Potential and Limits
Abstract
Research on the aging mind has moved from a simple growth vs decline view to a conception of a joint consideration of potential and limits. This development is illustrated by research on two categories of cognitive functioning: the cognitive mechanics and the cognitive pragmatics. The cognitive mechanics (comparable to fluid intelligence) are primarily determined by the evolution-based neurophysiological architecture of the mind, whereas the cognitive pragmatics (comparable to crystallized intelligence) primarily reflect the impact of culture. Testing-the-limits research on basic memory serves as a prototypical instantiation of the aging of cognitive mechanics; research on wisdom and the cognitive management of the self are prototypical examples of the aging of cognitive pragmatics. In the cognitive mechanics, as one would expect from a phenomenon which is largely genetically and biologically controlled, there is definite aging loss. Conversely, in the cognitive pragmatics, which is primarily culture-based, there is evidence for stability and positive change in persons who reach old age without specific brain pathology, and who live in favorable life circumstances. A model of successful aging, selective optimization with compensation, is presented to illustrate how individuals and societies might effectively manage the age-related shift toward a less positive balance between gains and losses and the associated dynamics between culture-based growth and biology-based decline in level of functioning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Baltes, P. B. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.4.366 · Cited by 2,066
Self-citationBaltes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1997) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.12.1.12 · Cited by 1,430
Self-citationLIFESPAN PSYCHOLOGY: Theory and Application to Intellectual Functioning
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471 · Cited by 1,281
Self-citationLife Span Theory in Developmental Psychology
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0111 · Cited by 1,240
Self-citationSternberg, R. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347 · Cited by 867
Metadata
- Authors
- Baltes, P. B.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-10-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 580-594
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2151640476
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Aging Mind: Potential and Limits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/33.5.580
- The paper
- Baltes, P. B. (1993). The Aging Mind: Potential and Limits. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/33.5.580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.