Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Do For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Nursing Homes Behave Differently?

Aaronson, W. E., Zinn, J. S., Rosko, M. D.·1994·The Gerontologist

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine behavioral differences between for-profit (FP) and not-for-profit (NFP) nursing homes. Previous studies have failed to establish consistent behavioral differences. This study uses a simultaneous equation model to control for potential endogeneity among system variables, with model parameters estimated using 3SLS. The study provides evidence that NFPs provide significantly higher quality of care to Medicaid beneficiaries and to self-pay residents than do FPs, as evidenced by better staffing and better outcomes among nursing homes with residents at higher risk for adverse outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/34.6.775

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Aaronson, W. E., Zinn, J. S., & Rosko, M. D.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
1994-12-01
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
775-786
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2033913603
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Nursing Homes Behave Differently? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/34.6.775
The paper
Aaronson, W. E., Zinn, J. S., & Rosko, M. D. (1994). Do For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Nursing Homes Behave Differently? The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.6.775

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.