Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experts recommend minimum nurse staffing standards for nursing facilities in the United States

·2000·The Gerontologist

Abstract

The experts concluded that current data show that the average nurse staffing levels (for RNs, LVN/LPNs, and NAs) in nursing homes are too low in some facilities to provide high quality of care. Caregiving, the central feature of a nursing home, needs to be improved to ensure high quality of care to residents. Because detailed time studies have not been conducted on the amount of time that is required to provide high quality of care to residents, expert opinion is currently the best approach to addressing the problem of inadequate staffing. Increases in the education level and training of nursing staff are also strongly recommended as a step to improving quality of care and reducing turnover rates in nursing homes. These recommendations are designed for consideration by Congress, HCFA regulators, policymakers, nursing home administrators, and nurses. Ideally, Congress would pass legislation establishing these recommendations as minimum standards for all nursing homes or direct HCFA to establish detailed minimum nurse staffing standards to ensure that staffing levels take into account the number and the case-mix of the residents. Alternatively, HCFA could introduce minimum staffing standards through the regulatory process. In 1999 there were a number of efforts at the state level to increase minimum staffing levels. Mohler (1999) surveyed selected states and found that 21 states had either proposed new legislation or were considering proposals for new legislation or new regulations. In California, for example, in 1999 the state budget approved $31 million in new state funds (to be matched with $31 million in federal Medicaid dollars) to increase nursing home staffing minimum requirements from 2.8 to 3.2 hr per resident day and to increase wage rates. Overall, nursing facilities need to be held accountable by HCFA for providing adequate levels and types of staffing to meet the needs of their residents, especially because government is paying for 61% of the expenditures. Adopting these minimum standards will have an important impact on improving the quality of the nation's nursing home care. Additional research is needed to determine appropriate levels and types of staff to provide high quality of care to residents. These studies could test the proposed staffing standards against existing staffing levels to examine the impacts on quality. As new data become available on staffing levels, revisions of staffing standards should be made if necessary to ensure that high standards are maintained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/40.1.5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
5-16
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W134049450
Cited by
278
References
28
FWCI
36.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experts recommend minimum nurse staffing standards for nursing facilities in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/40.1.5
The paper
Experts recommend minimum nurse staffing standards for nursing facilities in the United States. (2000). The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/40.1.5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.