The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: is it adequate?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index†‡
Lake, E. T. (2002) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.10032 · Cited by 1,769
Retooling for an aging America: building the health care workforce
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5066 · Cited by 688
Mitchell, P. H., Ferketich, S., Jennings, B. M., & American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel on Quality Health Care (1998) · Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01234.x · Cited by 444
Experts recommend minimum nurse staffing standards for nursing facilities in the United States
(2000) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/40.1.5 · Cited by 278
Hanrahan, N. P., Aiken, L. H., McClaine, L., & Hanlon, A. L. (2010) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.3109/01612840903200068 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 34-2784-34-2784
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4237245373
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: is it adequate? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.34-2784
- The paper
- Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: is it adequate? (1997). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-2784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
