Cited by 87Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Health and Functional Outcomes and Health Care Utilization of Persons With Dementia in Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities: Comparison With Nursing Homes

Sloane, Philip D., Zimmerman, Sheryl, Gruber-Baldini, Ann L., Hebel, J. Richard, Magaziner, Jay, Konrad, Thomas R.·2005·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compares health and functional outcomes and health care utilization of persons with dementia residing in residential care/assisted living (RC/AL) facilities and nursing homes. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study uses data from a longitudinal cohort study of 1,252 residents with dementia in 106 RC/AL facilities and 40 nursing homes in four states. RESULTS: Rates of mortality; new or worsening morbidity; and change in activities of daily living, cognition, behavioral problems, depressive symptoms, social function, and withdrawal did not differ between the two settings. However, because of death or transfer, only about one half of the persons with mild dementia and one third of those with moderate to severe dementia remained in RC/AL facilities 1 year after enrollment. In addition, hospitalization rates were greater among individuals with mild dementia in RC/AL facilities, largely because of a medically unstable subgroup with high nursing-home-transfer rates. IMPLICATIONS: Many persons with dementia can be served equally well in either setting; however, those with major medical care needs may benefit from nursing home residence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/45.suppl_1.124

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study showed a large effect size for better washing, a moderate effect size for better dressing and small effect sizes for better feeding, toileting and mobility for the SCU group compared to the n-SCU group.

    “More specifically, 1 study [28] showed a large effect size for better washing, a moderate effect size for better dressing and small effect sizes for better feeding, toileting and mobility for the SCU group compared to the n-SCU group.”

    From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Residence in Specialized Units section (page not provided) reports more rapid ADL decline in special care units than in nonspecialized settings in residential care/assisted living, and no such association in nursing homes. The Discussion (page not provided) likewise reports little overall difference between the settings. Neither section supports the claimed pattern of better washing, dressing, feeding, toileting, and mobility or its effect-size classifications. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study showed more aggression in the n-SCU group compared to SCUs, with a small effect size.

    “One study showed more aggression in the n-SCU group, with a small effect size [28].”

    From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Residence in Specialized Units section reports no significant difference in changes in behavioral problems between special care units and nonspecialized settings. The Discussion’s small standardized effect sizes (0.2–0.3) describe differences the study could detect, not an observed aggression difference. Our copy does not report greater aggression in the nonspecialized group. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Activity disturbance with a small effect size was more common in the SCU group compared to the n-SCU group in one study.

    “Activity disturbance with a small effect size was more common in another study [28].”

    From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Residence in Specialized Units section reports no significant difference between special care units and nonspecialized settings in changes in behavioral problems or withdrawal. The Discussion describes 0.2–0.3 as effect sizes the study could detect, not an observed increase in activity disturbance. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A large effect size for better communication and recognition and a small effect size for better orientation in the SCU group compared to the n-SCU group were found.

    “A large effect size for better communication and recognition and a small effect size for better orientation in the SCU group compared to the n-SCU group were also found [28].”

    From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [28]

    The ‘Residence in Specialized Units’ section compares special care units with nonspecialized settings but does not report communication, recognition, or orientation outcomes. The Discussion mentions effect sizes of 0.2–0.3 only as differences the study could have detected, not as observed effects. Searches for communication, recognition, orientation, and the claimed effect sizes found no passage establishing this claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A greater global cognitive impairment in the SCU group compared to n-SCUs was found in 10 studies with large, moderate and small effect sizes or significant p values.

    “A greater global cognitive impairment in the SCU group was found in 10 studies with large [33,38,39,42], moderate [20,28,36] and small effect sizes [21,34] or significant p values [43].”

    From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [28]

    Table 1 (Discussion; page unavailable) reports a significant cognition difference between nursing homes and residential care/assisted living facilities, not between special care units (SCUs) and nonspecialized settings. The Residence in Specialized Units section compares changes in cognition but reports no significant difference; our copy does not provide the claimed significant comparison of global cognitive impairment at baseline. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [11]11. Dittmar, N. (1989). Facility and resident characteristics of board and care homes for the elderly. In M. Moon, G. Gaberlavage, & S. J. Newman (Eds.), Preserving independence, supporting needs: The role of board and care homes. Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute, American Association of Retired Persons.
  2. [38]38. Sloane, P. D., Zimmerman, S., & Ory, M. (2001). Care for persons with dementia. In S. Zimmerman, P. D. Sloane, & J. K. Eckert (Eds.), Assisted living: Needs, practices, and policies in residential care for the elderly (pp. 242-270). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. [41]41. Webber, P. A., Breuer, W., & Lindeman, D. A. (1995). Alzheimer's special care units vs. integrated nursing homes: A comparison of resident outcomes. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 1, 189-205.
  4. [44]44. Zimmerman, S. I., Sloane P. D., & Eckert J. K. (2001). The state and quality of assisted living. In L. Noelker & Z. Harel (Eds.), Linking quality long- term care and quality of life (pp. 117-135). New York: Springer.
  5. [45]45. Zimmerman, S., Sloane, P. D., Eckert, J. K., Buie, V. C., Walsh, J., Hebel, J. R., et al. (2001). Overview of the collaborative studies of long-term care. In S. Zimmerman, P. D. Sloane, & J. K. Eckert (Eds.), Assisted living: Needs, practices and policies in residential care for the elderly (pp. 117-143). Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sloane, P. D., Zimmerman, S., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Hebel, J. R., Magaziner, J., & Konrad, T. R.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Sloane, Philip D.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2005-10
Volume
45
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
124-134
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2102023377
Cited by
87
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
dementia, residential care, assisted living, nursing homes, health care utilization, functional outcome, activities of daily living, hospitalization, nursing home transfer, mortality, behavioral problems, depressive symptoms, social function
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Delivery of Health Care, Dementia, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Nursing Homes, Residential Facilities, Cohort Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Assisted Living Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review