The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Caregivers' Reasons for Nursing Home Placement: Clues for Improving Discussions With Families Prior to the Transition
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study identifies the relative importance of reasons for institutionalization endorsed by caregivers of patients with dementia; examines the relationship between caregivers' reasons for institutionalization and indicators of caregiver and patient physical and emotional functioning measured in the prior year; and compares, on these indicators, caregivers who institutionalized their care recipients with caregivers who did not. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were 2,200 caregivers from the National Longitudinal Caregiver Study, including 580 who institutionalized their care recipient during the 3-year interval. Caregivers' reason(s) for institutionalization were examined and correlated with indicators of caregiver and patient physical and emotional functioning. These indicators were used in a proportional hazards model to determine independent predictors. RESULTS: Caregivers' reasons for placement included (a) the need for more skilled care (65%); (b) the caregivers' health (49%); (c) the patients' dementia-related behaviors (46%); and (d) the need for more assistance (23%). Each of these reasons was significantly associated with indicators in the prior year's survey. This study uniquely demonstrates that caregiving task demand and a single-item measure of caregiver life satisfaction significantly predict placement. IMPLICATIONS: These findings emphasize that caregivers' reasons have valid underpinnings and that institutionalization of dementia patients results from caregiver and patient factors evident in the year prior to placement. In routine office visits, caregivers should be systematically screened; accounts of low life satisfaction, dementia problem behaviors, or high task demand should cue clinicians that discussions of nursing home placement would be timely and appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caregiver Weil-Being: A Multidimensional Examination of Family Caregivers of Demented Adults
George, L. K., & Gwyther, L. P. (1986) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/26.3.253 · Cited by 1,393
Patient and Caregiver Characteristics and Nursing Home Placement in Patients With Dementia
Yaffe, K. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2090 · Cited by 903
Long-term Care Placement of Dementia Patients and Caregiver Health and Well-being
Schulz, R. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.8.961 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: A review of the literature
Etters, L., Goodall, D., & Harrison, B. E. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00342.x · Cited by 1,112
Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among older adults in long-term care homes: a systematic review
Seitz, D., Purandare, N., & Conn, D. (2010) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610210000608 · Cited by 592
Toot, S., Swinson, T., Devine, M., Challis, D., & Orrell, M. (2017) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610216001654 · Cited by 421
Afram, B., Stephan, A., Verbeek, H., Bleijlevens, M. H. C., Suhonen, R., Sutcliffe, C., Raamat, K., Cabrera, E., Soto, M. E., Hallberg, I. R., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.09.012 · Cited by 230
Cepoiu-Martin, M., Tam-Tham, H., Patten, S., Maxwell, C. J., & Hogan, D. B. (2016) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4449 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Buhr, G. T., Kuchibhatla, M., & Clipp, E. C.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-61
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2122976912
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 33.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.