Cited by 144Aging and Gerontology ResearchRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentAging, Health, and Disability

Combating Ageism: How Successful Is Successful Aging?

Calasanti, Toni·2016·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Purpose To explore the extent to which the successful aging discourse has accomplished Rowe and Kahn's (1998) goal of combating ageism by (a) eradicating the narrative of decline and burden, and highlighting the positive aspects of aging; and (b) emphasizing individuals' ability to age successfully. To investigate this, I first situate ageism in a framework of age relations. Design and methods Using a qualitative approach, I analyze data generated from semistructured, in-depth interviews conducted among a diverse sample of 19 middle-aged men and women. Respondents were asked about what successful aging means to them, as well as their perceptions of their own aging, and old age. Results Respondents are familiar with the notion of successful aging, and they believe that they can and should achieve this. However, rather than easing ageism, they experience the mandate to age successfully as a source of tension as they simultaneously realize that it is outside their control. They express continued fears of aging; and they implicitly blame themselves or others who fail to age successfully. Their comments suggest that, rather than supplanting the discourse of decline, the successful aging narrative coexists with it. Implications By not challenging the age relations that denigrate differences, the successful aging framework does not eliminate ageism and might even increase it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnv076

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ageism is found in gerontological research.

    “Ageism is even found in gerontological research-a surprising observation given the field's sensitivity to older adults' experiences.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2016

  • The field's dominant view of what it means to age successfully is ageist in its treatment of middle age as the standard and its failure to challenge the devaluation of later life stages.

    “For example, the field's dominant view of what it means to age successfully is ageist in its treatment of middle age as the standard and its failure to challenge the devaluation of later life stages (e.g., Calasanti 2016, Dillaway & Byrnes 2009, Katz & Calasanti 2015).”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2016

  • Age relations' theoretical utility is evidenced by its application to critical examinations of various phenomena.

    “Age relations' theoretical utility is evidenced by its application to critical examinations of various phenomena.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2016

  • The successful aging discourse buttresses the neoliberal agenda.

    “By constructing aging as an ongoing struggle by the individual to stave off age-related declines and maintain high levels of productivity, the successful aging discourse buttresses the neoliberal agenda.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2016

  • Age performances are propelled in contemporary Western contexts by a neoliberal rationality demanding individuals' body management as the key to reducing all later life risks.

    “Moreover, these performances are propelled in contemporary Western contexts by a neoliberal rationality demanding individuals' body management as the key to reducing all later life risks, including poverty, illness, disability, and isolation”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calasanti, T.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Calasanti, Toni
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2015-07-16
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1093-1101
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2256544160
Cited by
144
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
successful aging, ageism, age relations, fear of aging, middle-aged adults, perceptions of aging, self-blame
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research, Ageism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review