The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of a Virtual Reality Forest on People With Dementia: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose of the Study: To measure and describe the effectiveness of a Virtual Reality Forest (VRF) on engagement, apathy, and mood states of people with dementia, and explore the experiences of staff, people with dementia and their families. Design and Methods: A mixed-methods study conducted between February and May 2016. Ten residents with dementia, 10 family members, and 9 care staff were recruited from 2 residential aged care facilities, operated by one care provider, located in Victoria, Australia. Residents participated in one facilitated VRF session. Residents' mood, apathy, and engagement were measured by the Observed Emotion Rating Scale, Person-Environment Apathy Rating Scale, and Types of Engagement. All participants were interviewed. Results: Overall, the VRF was perceived by residents, family members, and staff to have a positive effect. During the VRF experience, residents experienced more pleasure (p = .008) and a greater level of alertness (p < .001). They also experienced a greater level of fear/anxiety during the forest experience than the comparative normative sample (p = .016). Implications: This initial, small-scale study represents the first to introduce the VRF activity and describe the impact on people with dementia. The VRF was perceived to have a positive effect on people with dementia, although, compared to the normative sample, a greater level of fear/anxiety during the VRF was experienced. This study suggests virtual reality may have the potential to improve quality of life, and the outcomes can be used to inform the development of future Virtual Reality activities for people with dementia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some of the reviewed articles demonstrated the significant role of staff in supporting VR/AR implementation in care settings.”
From Facilitators and Barriers to Using Virtual Reality and its Impact on Social Engagement in Aged Care Settings: A Scoping Review (2023) · cites this paper as Moyle et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“The involvement of family members in developing content, accompanying older adults during use, and stimulating connections and conversations with family members are means to enhance VR implementation in LTC (Moyle et al., 2018; Webber et al., 2021).”
From Facilitators and Barriers to Using Virtual Reality and its Impact on Social Engagement in Aged Care Settings: A Scoping Review (2023) · cites this paper as Moyle et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Moyle et al. (2018) demonstrated that the Virtual Forest program helped residents relax when the program was conducted in a peaceful environment.”
From Facilitators and Barriers to Using Virtual Reality and its Impact on Social Engagement in Aged Care Settings: A Scoping Review (2023) · cites this paper as Moyle et al. (2018)
Citations
Cites
Slater, M., & Steed, A. (2000) · Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474600566925 · Cited by 769
Clinical features and multidisciplinary approaches to dementia care
MacDonald, S. W. S., Grand, & Caspar (2011) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s17773 · Cited by 286
Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: A systematic review
Span, M., Hettinga, M., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J. F. J., Eefsting, J. A., & Smits, C. H. M. (2013) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2013.01.002 · Cited by 165
Recreating living experiences from past memories through virtual worlds for people with dementia
Siriaraya, P., & Ang, C. S. (2014) · ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557035 · Cited by 117
Outcomes associated with virtual reality in psychological interventions: where are we now?
Turner, W. A., & Casey, L. M. (2014) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.10.003 · Cited by 116
Observed affect and quality of life in dementia: Further affirmations and problems.
Lawton, M. P., Haitsma, K. S. V., Perkinson, M. A., & Ruckdeschel, K. (1999) · Journal of Mental Health and Aging · Cited by 94
Assessing Engagement in People With Dementia: A New Approach to Assessment Using Video Analysis
Jones, C., Sung, B., & Moyle, W. (2015) · Archives of Psychiatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2015.06.019 · Cited by 75
Self-citationTwo-week virtual reality training for dementia: Single case feasibility study
McEwen, D., Taillon‐Hobson, A., Bilodeau, M., Sveistrup, H., & Finestone, H. M. (2014) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2013.10.0231 · Cited by 61
From virtual reality to interreality in the treatment of anxiety disorders
Repetto, C., & Riva, G. (2011) · Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.2217/npy.11.5 · Cited by 60
Virtual navigation for memory rehabilitation in a traumatic brain injured patient
Caglio, M., Corazzini, L. L., D’Agata, F., Cauda, F., Sacco, K., Monteverdi, S., Zettin, M., Duca, S., & Geminiani, G. C. (2012) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554794.2011.568499 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Alzheimer’s Australia Vic, 2016, Fight Alzheimer’s Save Australia
- Lawton, 1999, Observed Emotion Rating Scale, Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 5, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Park, M. J., Kim, D. J., Lee, U., Na, E. J., & Jeon, H. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00505 · Cited by 437
Kim, O., Pang, Y., & Kim, J. (2019) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2180-x · Cited by 243
D'Cunha, N. M., Nguyen, D. T., Naumovski, N., McKune, A. J., Kellett, J., Georgousopoulou, E. N., Frost, J. S., & Isbel, S. T. (2019) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000500040 · Cited by 218
Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People
McFarlane, R. A., Barry, J., Cissé, G., Gislason, M., Gruca, M., Higgs, K., Horwitz, P., Nguyen, G. H., O’Sullivan, J., Sahu, S., et al. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108765015 · Cited by 207
Baker, S., Waycott, J., Robertson, E., Carrasco, R., Neves, B. B., Hampson, R., & Vetere, F. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102105 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyle, W., Jones, C., Dwan, T., & Petrovich, T.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Dementia Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Moyle, Wendy
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-03-15
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 478-487
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2604368725
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Alzheimer’s Australia Vic
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- virtual reality, dementia, engagement, apathy, mood, nursing homes, care workers, family caregivers, anxiety, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Virtual Reality, Affect, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Emotions, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Residential Facilities, Victoria, Apathy, Forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review