Cited by 142Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Caregivers of Dementia Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is limited evidence for the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in managing psychological morbidities in caregivers of dementia patients. To evaluate changes in dementia caregivers' depression, anxiety, and stress following CBT. Also to assess quality of life, intervention adherence/satisfaction and therapy effectiveness using different formats, frequencies, and delivery methods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Studies were identified through electronic bibliographic searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library) and from gray literature (Conference Proceedings Citation Index and clinicaltrials.gov). Data were pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included. Depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.47 to -0.21; p < .001) and stress (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.20; p < .001) were significantly reduced after CBT, relative to comparator groups, while anxiety was not (SMD = 0.10; 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.39; p = .47). A subgroup analysis demonstrated that statistically significant reductions in depression and stress were limited to group, but not individual, formats. An additional subgroup analysis revealed that eight CBT sessions or fewer were equally effective as more than eight sessions at significantly reducing depression and stress, relative to comparator groups. Furthermore, analysis with independent samples t-tests demonstrated no statistically significant differences between mean changes in depression (MD = 0.79; 95% CI: -0.45 to 2.03; p = .21) and stress (MD = 0.21; 95% CI: -1.43 to 1.85; p = .80) when directly comparing CBT groups of ≤8 and >8 sessions. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Group CBT provides small but significant benefits to caregivers' depression and stress. Therapy cost-effectiveness may be improved by limiting therapy to group formats and eight sessions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnx217

Cites

45 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cochrane Collaboration, 2017, The cochrane public health group guide for developing a cochrane protocol, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online)
  2. Fu, 2008, Handling continuous outcomes in quantitative synthesis
  3. Knapp, 2014, Dementia UK: Update. Igarss 2014
  4. NICE, 2012, Dementia: Supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care
  5. Prince, 2015, World Alzheimer Report 2015, Alzheimer’s Disease International- World Alzheimer Report 2015
  6. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2014, Review manager, Cochrane Collaboration

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–142 of 142

Metadata

Authors
Hopkinson, M. D., Reavell, J., Lane, D. A., & Mallikarjun, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Mallikarjun, Pavan
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2018-02-24
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
e343-e362
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2790970921
Cited by
142
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
University of Birmingham
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, dementia caregivers, caregiver depression, caregiver anxiety, caregiver stress, group therapy, quality of life, intervention adherence, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Dementia, Depression, Humans, Psychotherapy, Brief, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review