The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultra-deep, long-read nanopore sequencing of mock microbial community standards
Open accessAbstract
Background: Long sequencing reads are information-rich: aiding de novo assembly and reference mapping, and consequently have great potential for the study of microbial communities. However, the best approaches for analysis of long-read metagenomic data are unknown. Additionally, rigorous evaluation of bioinformatics tools is hindered by a lack of long-read data from validated samples with known composition. Findings: We sequenced 2 commercially available mock communities containing 10 microbial species (ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standards) with Oxford Nanopore GridION and PromethION. Both communities and the 10 individual species isolates were also sequenced with Illumina technology. We generated 14 and 16 gigabase pairs from 2 GridION flowcells and 150 and 153 gigabase pairs from 2 PromethION flowcells for the evenly distributed and log-distributed communities, respectively. Read length N50 ranged between 5.3 and 5.4 kilobase pairs over the 4 sequencing runs. Basecalls and corresponding signal data are made available (4.2 TB in total). Alignment to Illumina-sequenced isolates demonstrated the expected microbial species at anticipated abundances, with the limit of detection for the lowest abundance species below 50 cells (GridION). De novo assembly of metagenomes recovered long contiguous sequences without the need for pre-processing techniques such as binning. Conclusions: We present ultra-deep, long-read nanopore datasets from a well-defined mock community. These datasets will be useful for those developing bioinformatics methods for long-read metagenomics and for the validation and comparison of current laboratory and software pipelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Minimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences
Li, H. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · Cited by 14,807
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114 · Cited by 12,496
Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments
Wood, D. E., & Salzberg, S. L. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 · Cited by 4,521
Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis
Quince, C., Walker, A. W., Simpson, J. T., Loman, N. J., & Segata, N. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3935 · Cited by 2,202
Self-citationComprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers
McIntyre, A. B. R., Ounit, R., Afshinnekoo, E., Prill, R. J., Hénaff, E., Alexander, N., Minot, S. S., Danko, D., Foox, J., Ahsanuddin, S., et al. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1299-7 · Cited by 342
BulkVis: a graphical viewer for Oxford nanopore bulk FAST5 files
Payne, A., Holmes, N., Rakyan, V., & Loose, M. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty841 · Cited by 326
Cited by
Nanopore sequencing technology, bioinformatics and applications
Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Bollas, A., Wang, Y., & Au, K. F. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01108-x · Cited by 1,753
metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs
Kolmogorov, M., Bickhart, D. M., Behsaz, B., Gurevich, A., Rayko, M., Shin, S. B., Kuhn, K., Yuan, J., Polevikov, E., Smith, T. P. L., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-00971-x · Cited by 1,077
Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes
Chen, L.-X., Anantharaman, K., Shaiber, A., Eren, A. M., & Banfield, J. F. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.258640.119 · Cited by 401
Karst, S. M., Ziels, R. M., Kirkegaard, R. H., Sørensen, E. A., McDonald, D., Zhu, Q., Knight, R., & Albertsen, M. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01041-y · Cited by 423
Readfish enables targeted nanopore sequencing of gigabase-sized genomes
Payne, A., Holmes, N., Clarke, T., Munro, R., Debebe, B. J., & Loose, M. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-00746-x · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholls, S. M., Quick, J. C., Tang, S., & Loman, N. J.
- Venue
- GigaScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2047-217X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2950671516
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultra-deep, long-read nanopore sequencing of mock microbial community standards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gigascience/giz043
- The paper
- Nicholls, S. M., Quick, J. C., Tang, S., & Loman, N. J. (2019). Ultra-deep, long-read nanopore sequencing of mock microbial community standards. GigaScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.