The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Divergent evolution of fucosyltransferase genes from vertebrates, invertebrates, and bacteria
Abstract
On the basis of function and sequence similarities, the vertebrate fucosyltransferases can be classified into three groups: alpha-2-, alpha-3-, and alpha-6-fucosyltransferases. Thirty new putative fucosyltransferase genes from invertebrates and bacteria and six conserved peptide motifs have been identified in DNA and protein databanks. Two of these motifs are specific of alpha-3-fucosyltransferases, one is specific of alpha-2-fucosyltransferases, another is specific of alpha-6-fucosyltransferases, and two are shared by both alpha-2- and alpha-6-fucosyltranserases. Based on these data, literature data, and the phylogenetic analysis of the conserved peptide motifs, a model for the evolution offucosyltransferase genes by successive duplications, followed by divergent evolution is proposed, with either two different ancestors, one for the alpha-2/6-fucosyltransferases and one for the alpha-3-fucosyltransferases or a single common ancestor for the two families. The expected properties of such an hypothetical ancestor suggest that the plant or insect alpha-3-fucosyltransferases using chitobiose as acceptor might be the present forms of this ancestor, since fucosyltransferases using chitobiose as acceptor are expected to be of earlier appearance in evolution than enzymes using N -acetyllactosamine. However, an example of convergent evolution of fucosyltransferase genes is suggested for the appearance of the Leaepitopes found in plants and primates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori
Tomb, J.-F., White, O., Kerlavage, A. R., Clayton, R. A., Sutton, G. G., Fleischmann, R. D., Ketchum, K. A., Klenk, H. P., Gill, S., Dougherty, B. A., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41483 · Cited by 3,529
Cited by
Global view of human protein glycosylation pathways and functions
Schjoldager, K. T., Narimatsu, Y., Joshi, H. J., & Clausen, H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00294-x · Cited by 1,309
Role of Glycosylation in Development
Haltiwanger, R. S., & Lowe, J. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074043 · Cited by 757
Wang, X., Inoue, S., Gu, J., Miyoshi, E., Noda, K., Li, W., Mizuno-Horikawa, Y., Nakano, M., Asahi, M., Takahashi, M., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507375102 · Cited by 476
Stanley, P. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005199 · Cited by 455
Glycoproteomic probes for fluorescent imaging of fucosylated glycans in vivo
Sawa, M., Hsu, T.-L., Itoh, T., Sugiyama, M., Hanson, S. R., Vogt, P. K., & Wong, C.-H. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605418103 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Oriol, R., Mollicone, R., Cailleau, A., Balanzino, L., & Breton, C.
- Venue
- Glycobiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 323-334
- ISSN
- 0959-6658 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2423
- OpenAlex
- W2104214437
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Divergent evolution of fucosyltransferase genes from vertebrates, invertebrates, and bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/glycob/9.4.323
- The paper
- Oriol, R., Mollicone, R., Cailleau, A., Balanzino, L., & Breton, C. (1999). Divergent evolution of fucosyltransferase genes from vertebrates, invertebrates, and bacteria. Glycobiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/9.4.323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.