Cited by 3Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsHealthcare Policy and Management

Higher than Expected Telemedicine Use by Racial and Ethnic Minority and Cognitively Impaired Medicare Beneficiaries

Open access
Cui, Manying (Mandy), Leng, Mei, Arbanas, Julia, Romanov, Artem, Tseng, Chi-Hong, Wei, Melissa Y, Damberg, Cheryl L, Harawa, Nina +2 more·2025·Health Affairs Scholar

Abstract

Although pandemic-era telemedicine flexibilities may have preserved access to care, concerns remain that telemedicine may have been inequitably distributed among older adults, especially those with mild cognitive impairment or dementia (MCID). As telemedicine flexibilities are set to fully expire on December 31, 2024, we aimed to examine pandemic-era and future-intended telemedicine use among older Americans to help inform post-pandemic telemedicine policy design. We hypothesized that telemedicine would be disproportionately underutilized among older adults with MCID or with racial and ethnic minority status. We used nationally representative survey data from the Health and Retirement Study and analyzed pandemic-era and future-intended telemedicine use among 10 075 Medicare beneficiaries aged >50 years during 2020–2022 by cognition across beneficiaries-level characteristics such as age, gender, insurance status, education, and multimorbidity. Results were adjusted by survey weights and nonresponse rates for national representativeness. Contrary to our hypothesis, compared with White Medicare beneficiaries, Hispanic and Black beneficiaries with normal cognition reported 44% and 57% greater pandemic-era and future-intended telemedicine use, respectively, while Black beneficiaries with MCID reported 57% greater pandemic-era telemedicine use. Our findings suggest that pandemic-era telemedicine utilization was especially common among racial and ethnic minority groups and those with MCID.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/haschl/qxae175

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vulnerable populations, including racial and ethnic minorities and older adults, can benefit from virtual visits that enable more equitable access to healthcare services.

    “Vulnerable populations, including racial and ethnic minorities and older adults, can benefit from virtual visits that enable more equitable access to healthcare services [237].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cui, M. (., Leng, M., Arbanas, J., Romanov, A., Tseng, C.-H., Wei, M. Y., Damberg, C. L., Harawa, N., Mafi, J. N., & Sarkisian, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Cui, Manying (Mandy)
Venue
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2025-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
qxae175-qxae175
ISSN
2976-5390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407006443
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs Scholar (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (R01AG070017-01)
  • NIH/NIA Beeson Emerging Leaders in Aging Research Career Development Award (K76AG064392-01A1)
  • NIH/NIA
  • Arnold Ventures
  • The Commonwealth Fund
  • Milliman MedInsight
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • NIA
  • AHRQ
  • NCATS
  • University of California
  • Los Angeles, Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
telemedicine use, racial and ethnic minorities, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Medicare beneficiaries, older adults, COVID-19 pandemic, health care access disparities, telehealth policy, multimorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review