The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does Antenatal Care Make a Difference to Safe Delivery? A Study in Urban Uttar Pradesh, India
Open accessAbstract
Evidence to support that antenatal screenings and interventions are effective in reducing maternal mortality has been scanty and studies have presented contradictory findings. In addition, antenatal care utilization is poorly characterized in studies. As an exposure under investigation, antenatal care should be well defined. However, measures typically only account for the frequency and timing of visits and not for care content. We introduce a new measure for antenatal care utilization, comprised of 20 input components covering care content and visit frequency. Weights for each component reflect its relative importance to better maternal and child health, and were derived from a survey of international researchers. This composite measure for antenatal care utilization was studied in a probability sample of 300 low to middle income women who had given birth within the last three years in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. Results showed that demarcating women's antenatal care status based on a simple indicator--two or more visits versus less--masked a large amount of variation in care received. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the effect of antenatal care utilization on the likelihood of using safe delivery care, a factor known to decrease maternal mortality. After controlling for relevant socio-demographic and maternity history factors, women with a relatively high level of care (at the 75th percentile of the score) had an estimated odds of using trained assistance at delivery that was almost four times higher than women with a low level of care (at the 25th percentile of the score) (OR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.96, 8.10). Similar results were obtained for women delivering in a health facility versus at home. This strong positive association between level of care obtained during pregnancy and the use of safe delivery care may help explain why antenatal care could also be associated with reduced maternal mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simkhada, B., Teijlingen, E. R. V., Porter, M., & Simkhada, P. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04532.x · Cited by 977
Titaley, C. R., Hunter, C. L., Dibley, M. J., & Heywood, P. (2010) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-43 · Cited by 346
De Allegri, M., Ridde, V., Louis, V. R., Sarker, M., Tiendrebéogo, J., Yé, M., Müller, O., & Jahn, A. (2011) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.10.010 · Cited by 215
Gupta, S., Yamada, G., Mpembeni, R., Frumence, G., Callaghan-Koru, J. A., Stevenson, R., Brandes, N., & Baqui, A. H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101893 · Cited by 201
Mbuagbaw, L., Medley, N., Darzi, A. J., Richardson, M., Habiba Garga, K., & Ongolo-Zogo, P. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010994.pub2 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, S. S., Lippeveld, T., & Wypij, D.
- Venue
- Health Policy and Planning
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-48
- ISSN
- 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2237
- OpenAlex
- W2131182023
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Antenatal Care Make a Difference to Safe Delivery? A Study in Urban Uttar Pradesh, India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/heapol/14.1.38
- The paper
- Bloom, S. S., Lippeveld, T., & Wypij, D. (1999). Does Antenatal Care Make a Difference to Safe Delivery? A Study in Urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/14.1.38
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.