Cited by 215Global Maternal and Child HealthHealthcare Systems and ReformsReproductive Health and Contraception

Determinants of utilisation of maternal care services after the reduction of user fees: A case study from rural Burkina Faso

De Allegri, Manuela, Ridde, Valéry, Louis, Valérie R., Sarker, Malabika, Tiendrebéogo, Justin, Yé, Maurice, Müller, Olaf, Jahn, Albrecht·2011·Health Policy

Abstract

Objective To identify determinants of utilisation for antenatal care (ANC) and skilled attendance at birth after a substantial reduction in user fees.Methods The study was conducted in the Nouna Health District in north-western Burkina Faso in early 2009. Data was collected by means of a representative survey on a sample of 435 women who reported a pregnancy in the prior 12 months. Two independent logit models were used to assess the determinants of (a) ANC utilisation (defined as having attended at least 3 visits) and (b) skilled assistance at birth (defined as having delivered in a health facility).Results 76% of women had attended at least 3 ANC visits and 72% had delivered in a facility. Living within 5 km from a facility was positively associated, while animist religion, some ethnicities, and household wealth were negatively associated with ANC utilisation. Some ethnicities, living within 5 km from a health facility, and having attended at least 3 ANC visits were positively associated with delivering in a facility.Conclusions User fee alleviation secured equitable access to care across socio-economic groups, but alone did not ensure that all women benefited from ANC and from skilled attendance at birth. Investments in policies to address barriers beyond financial ones are urgently needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.10.010

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Allegri, M., Ridde, V., Louis, V. R., Sarker, M., Tiendrebéogo, J., Yé, M., Müller, O., & Jahn, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna (BF)
Venue
Health Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
210-218
ISSN
0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074059565
Cited by
215
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Collaborative Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
antenatal care utilization, skilled birth attendance, institutional delivery, obstetric care, health care access, distance to health facility, animism, ethnicity, household wealth, rural Burkina Faso
MeSH terms
Adult, Burkina Faso, Fees and Charges, Female, Financing, Government, Financing, Personal, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Logistic Models, Rural Health Services, Organizational Case Studies, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review