Building for the future: Influence of housing on intelligence quotients of children in an urban slum
Abstract
Introduction Interventions on behalf of the marginalized in society can assume many formats. In an urban slum the Government of Delhi built one-room houses for some of the residents in what is termed a 'plot area'. Not all residents could be accommodated in the project and the remainder continued to live next door in shanty houses of the slum. Nineteen years later, young children who had migrated with their parents, have grown up and have children of their own. We looked at the development of the children living in the two types of accommodation. Methods A total of 373 children were studied. All children (n = 200) between the ages of 3.5 and 5.5 years in a cluster of five residential blocks in the plot area were studied. As a control, children in two large clusters of shanty houses (n = 173) were also studied. For development assessment the Central Institute of Education (CIE) Test was performed. This is an Indian adaptation of the Standford-Binet Test. Multiple regression analysis was utilized to determine the factors that influenced IQ most. Results The mean IQ of the children in the plot area was 92.5 (s.d. 13.38) and in the shanty houses 89.5 (s.d. 12.9) (p = 0.05). Analysis showed that the most significant factors affecting IQ were malnutrition in the first 6 months of life and attendance of the child at pre-school. For nutrition in the first 6 months, there was no difference between the groups. For attendance at pre-school, 110 of 200 in the plot area and 47 of 173 in t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Choudhary 2002 was excluded because it had no relevant intervention (relocation not slum upgrading).
“Choudhary 2002 No relevant intervention ‐ relocation not slum upgrading.”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Choudhary 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thomson, H., Thomas, S., Sellstrom, E., & Petticrew, M. (2009) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.143909 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Rehfuess, E., & Carter, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010067.pub2 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
- Authors
- Choudhary, R.
- Affiliations
- St. Stephen’s Hospital (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Choudhary, R
- Venue
- Health Policy and Planning
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 420-424
- ISSN
- 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2237
- OpenAlex
- W2099840880
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Keywords
- housing conditions, intelligence quotient, child cognitive development, urban slums, early childhood malnutrition, preschool attendance, urban poverty, marginalized communities
- MeSH terms
- Psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Cultural Deprivation, Education, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities, Male, Nutrition Disorders, Poverty Areas, Public Housing, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Health, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review