Cited by 295Urban and Rural Development ChallengesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureEnergy and Environment Impacts

The Health Impacts of Housing Improvement: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies From 1887 to 2007

Open access
Thomson, Hilary, Thomas, Sian, Sellstrom, Eva, Petticrew, Mark·2009·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We conducted a systematic review of the health impacts of housing improvement. Methods. Forty-two bibliographic databases were searched for housing intervention studies from 1887 to 2007. Studies were appraised independently by H. T. and S. T. or E. S. for sources of bias. The data were tabulated and synthesized narratively, taking into account study quality. Results. Forty-five relevant studies were identified. Improvements in general, respiratory, and mental health were reported following warmth improvement measures, but these health improvements varied across studies. Varied health impacts were reported following housing-led neighborhood renewal. Studies from the developing world suggest that provision of basic housing amenities may lead to reduced illness. There were few reports of adverse health impacts following housing improvement. Some studies reported that the housing improvement was associated with positive impacts on socioeconomic determinants of health. Conclusions. Housing improvements, especially warmth improvements, can generate health improvements; there is little evidence of detrimental health impacts. The potential for health benefits may depend on baseline housing conditions and careful targeting of the intervention. Investigation of socioeconomic impacts associated with housing improvement is needed to investigate the potential for longer-term health impacts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2008.143909

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomson, H., Thomas, S., Sellstrom, E., & Petticrew, M.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Hilary Thomson and Sian Thomas are with the MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, Scotland. Eva Sellstrom is with the Department of Health Sciences, Mid-Sweden University, Ostersund. Mark Petticrew is with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2009-11
Volume
99
Issue
S3
Pages
S681-S692
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2016141746
Cited by
295
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
28.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
Keywords
home improvement, housing interventions, health effects, respiratory health, mental health, neighborhood revitalization, socioeconomic determinants of health, developing countries, housing conditions, intervention targeting
MeSH terms
Health Status, Housing, Humans, Social Class

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review