Cited by 17Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A health policy analysis of the implementation of the National Tobacco Control Act in Nigeria

Open access
Udokanma, Echezona Ejike, Ogamba, Ikedinachi, Ilo, Cajetan·2021·Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have emerged as a public health issue of concern in Nigeria. The massive increase in tobacco use amongst different population groups is a common NCDs risk factor. To this effect, the National Tobacco Control Act (NTCA) was enacted following the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). This article conducts a health policy agenda-setting analysis of the NTCA using the Kingdon’s multiple streams model and analyses its implementation using the Principal-Agent theory. The purposive and snowballing sampling methods were used to select and review relevant peer-review literature. Other data sources included gray literature, government reports, Non-Governmental Organization briefs and media resources. Though NTCA conforms to WHO FCTC, Nigeria only domesticated her obligation to this framework legislatively while the executive and administrative measures were found lacking. The challenges and gaps identified in the NTCA implementation include; revision of textual health warnings and lack of pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs, poor taxation, and the National Tobacco Control Commission’s (NTCC) lack of regulatory autonomy, hence, the poor policy implementation reported in this article. To effectively implement NTCA, a review of textual warnings, enforcement of pictorial warnings, regulatory autonomy of the NTCC and review of the tobacco taxation are suggested to help in the prevention and control of NCDs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapol/czaa175

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies have explored how tobacco control policy change comes about, particularly in LMICs and on tobacco tax policy.

    “Unfortunately, few studies have explored how tobacco control policy change comes about, particularly in the context of low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and on the topic of tobacco tax policy.20–24”

    From Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Methods section reports a paucity of documents and peer-reviewed articles on tobacco control policy in Nigeria, and describes examining how that policy developed. It does not establish that such studies are scarce across LMICs or specifically on how tobacco tax policy changes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Powerful actors in countries across the globe and across industries threatened by policy change similarly use lobbying to water down policy to their benefit, sometimes behind closed doors.

    “Additionally, like the tobacco industry in Ukraine, powerful actors in countries across the globe and across industries threatened by policy change similarly use lobbying to water down policy to their benefit, sometimes behind closed doors.20–22 24–26 28 33 34 63–65”

    From Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Politics stream describes British American Tobacco’s efforts to influence Nigerian parliamentarians and weaken or stop tobacco-control legislation. That supports the claim’s core example of an industry actor seeking to blunt policy change, but the paper does not establish the broader assertion across countries and industries or specifically describe lobbying behind closed doors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Highlighting the economic cost of tobacco use, as well as framing policy as a health measure, is consistent with the strategy used in Nigeria to pass their national tobacco control act.

    “Highlighting the economic cost of tobacco use, as well as framing policy as a health measure, is consistent with the strategy used in Nigeria to pass their national tobacco control act.24”
  • The importance of the EU-UAA as a motivating factor driving policy adoption fits within the literature highlighting how the FCTC and Master Settlement Agreement have also motivated tobacco policy.

    “The importance of the EU-UAA as a motivating factor driving policy adoption fits within the literature highlighting how the FCTC and Master Settlement Agreement have also motivated tobacco policy.24 66 67”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Adeloye, 2019, Current prevalence pattern of tobacco smoking in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Public Health, 19, 14, 10.1186/s12889-019-8010-8 · DOI
  2. Agaku, 2012, Tobacco control in Nigeria- policy recommendations, Tobacco Induced Diseases, 10, 8, 10.1186/1617-9625-10-8 · DOI
  3. Alamu, 2016, Corruption anti-corruption agencies and the Nigerian Government, Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5, 1
  4. Beaglehole, 2011, Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis, The Lancet, 377, 1438, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60393-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Béland, 2016, The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18, 221
  6. Buess, 2015, European Union agencies and their management boards: an assessment of accountability and democratic legitimacy, Journal of European Public Policy, 22, 94, 10.1080/13501763.2014.881299 · DOI
  7. Busari, 2017, High prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with sickle cell disease in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, South West, Nigeria, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 17, 8, 10.1186/s12906-017-1812-2 · DOI
  8. Buse, 2012, Making Health Policy
  9. Delreux, 2017, The Principal Agent Model and the European Union, 1–
  10. Dijkstra, 2013, Policy-Making in EU Security and Defence: An Institutional Perspective, 10.1057/9781137357878 · DOI
  11. Ekpenyong, 2012, Double burden, non-communicable diseases and risk factors evaluation in sub-Saharan Africa: the Nigerian experience, European Journal of Sustainable Development, 1, 249, 10.14207/ejsd.2012.v1n2p249 · DOI
  12. Fritz, 2014, Problem-Driven Political Economy Analysis: The World Bank’s Experience, 1, 10.1596/978-1-4648-0121-1 · DOI
  13. Hall, Change, Choice and Conflict in Social Policy
  14. Juma, 2018, Introduction: non-communicable disease prevention policies in six African countries, BMC Public Health, 18, 8
  15. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies
  16. Lancaster, 2014, Problems, policy and politics: making sense of Australia’s “ice epidemic”, Policy Studies, 35, 147, 10.1080/01442872.2013.875144 · DOI
  17. Lencucha, 2018, ‘Opening windows and closing gaps: a case analysis of Canada’s 2009 tobacco additives ban and its policy lessons’, BMC Public Health, 18, 1321, 10.1186/s12889-018-6157-3 · DOI
  18. Levy, 2008, ‘The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths caused by smoking in an eastern European nation: results from the Albania sim smoke simulation model’, Tobacco Control, 16, 189
  19. Levy, 2013, Smoking-related deaths averted due to three years of policy progress, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 509, 10.2471/BLT.12.113878 · DOI
  20. Lukes, Power: A Radical Approach
  21. Magitta, 2018, Epidemiology of tobacco use and dependence in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Systematic review, Journal Pulmonology Clinical Research, 2, 9
  22. Mane, 2020, Using Evidence in Policy and Practice: Lessons from Africa, 206, 10.4324/9781003007043-12 · DOI
  23. Monaghan, 2011, Evidence versus Policy: Exploiting Research in UK Drug Policy Making, 10.2307/j.ctt9qgrgd · DOI
  24. Nwhator, 2012, ‘Nigeria’s costly complacency and the global tobacco epidemic’, Journal of Public Health Policy, 33, 16, 10.1057/jphp.2011.58 · DOI
  25. Okolo, 2014, ‘Corruption in Nigeria: the possible way out’, Global Journal of Human Social Science, 14, 31
  26. Oladepo, 2018, ‘Analysis of tobacco control policies in Nigeria: historical development and application of multi-sectoral action’, BMC Public Health, 18, 10.1186/s12889-018-5831-9 · DOI
  27. Pampel, 2008, Tobacco use in Sub-Saharan Africa: estimates from the Demographic Health Surveys, Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1772, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.003 · DOI
  28. Pampel, 2005, Patterns of tobacco use in the early epidemic stages: Malawi and Zambia, 2000-2002, American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1009, 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056895 · DOI
  29. Robinson, 2010, Participation in policy streams: testing the separation of problems and solutions in subnational policy systems Robinson/Eller: participation in policy streams, Policy Studies Journal, 38, 199, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00358.x · DOI
  30. Ukwueze, 2018, Tobacco control legislation and policy in Nigeria: much barking without biting, Elixir International Journal, 114, 49641
  31. Whiteford, 2016, How did youth mental health make it onto Australia’s 2011 federal policy agenda?, Sage Open, 6, 1, 10.1177/2158244016680855 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Winkler, 2015, Tobacco prevention policies in west-African countries and their effects on smoking prevalence Health policies, systems and management in low and middle-income countries, BMC Public Health, 15, 1, 10.1186/s12889-015-2562-z · DOI
  33. Wisdom, 2018, Influence of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control on tobacco legislation and policies in sub-Saharan Africa, BMC Public Health, 18, 27, 10.1186/s12889-018-5827-5 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Udokanma, E. E., Ogamba, I., & Ilo, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • Ebonyi State University (NG)
Corresponding author
Udokanma, Echezona Ejike
Venue
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2021-01-04
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
484-492
ISSN
  • 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2237
OpenAlex
W3119197472
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
tobacco control, policy implementation, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Kingdon's multiple streams model, agency theory, graphic health warnings, tobacco taxation, regulatory independence, non-communicable diseases, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Nigeria, Policy Making, Nicotiana, World Health Organization, Tobacco Industry, Tobacco Products, Tobacco Use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review