Cited by 31Healthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Policy and ManagementMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion

Renewing membership in three community-based health insurance schemes in rural India

Open access
Panda, Pradeep, Chakraborty, Arpita, Raza, Wameq, Bedi, Arjun S.·2016·Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

Low renewal rate is a key challenge facing the sustainability of community-based health insurance (CBHI) schemes. While there is a large literature on initial enrolment into such schemes, there is limited evidence on the factors that impede renewal. This article uses longitudinal data to analyse what determines renewal, both 1 year and 2 years after the introduction of three CBHI schemes, which have been operating in rural Bihar and Uttar Pradesh since 2011. We find that initial scheme uptake is ∼23-24% and that 2 years after scheme operation, only ∼20% of the initial enrolees maintain their membership. A household's socio-economic status does not seem to play a large role in impeding renewal. In some instances, a greater understanding of the scheme boosts renewal. The link between health status and use of health care in maintaining renewal is mixed. The clearest effect is that individuals living in households that have received benefits from the scheme are substantially more likely to renew their contracts. We conclude that the low retention rates may be attributed to limited benefit packages, slow claims processing times and the gap between the amounts claimed and amounts paid out by insurance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapol/czw090

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panda, P., Chakraborty, A., Raza, W., & Bedi, A. S.
Affiliations
  • International Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi (IN)
  • Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • International Institute of Social Studies (NL)
Venue
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2016-07-31
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
1433-1444
ISSN
  • 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2237
OpenAlex
W318596442
Cited by
31
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (223518)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Keywords
community-based health insurance, membership renewal, retention, rural India, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, socioeconomic status, health status, health care utilization, benefit packages, claims management
MeSH terms
Community Participation, Family Characteristics, Financing, Personal, Health Services, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status, Humans, India, Insurance, Health, Longitudinal Studies, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review