Cited by 60Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Systems and Practices

How to assess and prepare health systems in low- and middle-income countries for integration of services-a systematic review

Open access
Topp, Stephanie M, Abimbola, Seye, Joshi, Rohina, Negin, Joel·2018·Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

Despite growing support for integration of frontline services, a lack of information about the pre-conditions necessary to integrate such services hampers the ability of policy makers and implementers to assess how feasible or worthwhile integration may be, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We adopted a modified systematic review with aspects of realist review, including quantitative and qualitative studies that incorporated assessment of health system preparedness for and capacity to implement integrated services. We searched Medline via Ovid, Web of Science and the Cochrane library using terms adapted from Dudley and Garner's systematic review on integration in LMICs. From an initial list of 10 550 articles, 206 were selected for full-text review by two reviewers who independently reviewed articles and inductively extracted and synthesized themes related to health system preparedness. We identified five 'context' related categories and four health system 'capability' themes. The contextual enabling and constraining factors for frontline service integration were: (1) the organizational framework of frontline services, (2) health care worker preparedness, (3) community and client preparedness, (4) upstream logistics and (5) policy and governance issues. The intersecting health system capabilities identified were the need for: (1) sufficiently functional frontline health services, (2) sufficiently trained and motivated health care workers, (3) availability of technical tools and equipment suitable to facilitate integrated frontline services and (4) appropriately devolved authority and decision-making processes to enable frontline managers and staff to adapt integration to local circumstances. Moving beyond claims that integration is defined differently by different programs and thus unsuitable for comparison, this review demonstrates that synthesis is possible. It presents a common set of contextual factors and health system capabilities necessary for successful service integration which may be considered indicators of preparedness and could form the basis for an 'integration preparedness tool'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapol/czx169

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At present, health systems worldwide are poorly organized to respond to the needs of people with NCDs and other long-term conditions, as they were mainly developed to respond to people in need of urgent or episodic care, usually with single health conditions.

    “At present, health systems worldwide are poorly organized to respond to the needs of people with NCDs and other long-term conditions, as they were mainly developed to respond to people in need of urgent or episodic care, usually with single health conditions 17 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Topp, S. M., Abimbola, S., Joshi, R., & Negin, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Topp, Stephanie M
Venue
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2017-12-18
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
298-312
ISSN
  • 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2237
OpenAlex
W2776121737
Cited by
60
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
integrated care, health system preparedness, low- and middle-income countries, healthcare logistics, devolution of decision-making
MeSH terms
Administrative Personnel, Community Health Workers, Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Government Programs, Humans, Poverty, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review