The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a measure of communicative and critical health literacy: a pilot study of Japanese office workers
Open accessAbstract
With the increase in media reports and rapid diffusion of the Internet, the skills in finding and utilizing health information (health literacy; HL) are becoming important in maintaining and promoting health. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a brief measure to assess major components of communicative and critical HL among Japanese office workers, in order to consider its applicability to health promotion at workplace. The participants were 190 male office workers at a Japanese company. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed at the annual health checkup, in which HL, health-related behaviors and coping with job stress were asked. Also, the number of somatic symptoms reported by the worker was counted out of the eight symptoms in the health checkup questionnaire. The higher HL group was more likely to have regular eating patterns and exercise weekly, and tended to be a never smoker. In coping with job stress, those with higher HL were more likely to actively solve the problems or seek support from others, whereas those with lower HL were more likely to be resigned to the situation. Further, lower HL group reported significantly greater number of somatic symptoms than higher HL group. These findings were generally as hypothesized, supporting the validity of the HL scale among office workers. Further research on HL is needed to explore the extent and impact of HL on health outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sick individuals and sick populations
Rose, G. (2001) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/30.3.427 · Cited by 3,736
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Sick individuals and sick populations
ROSE, G. (1985) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/14.1.32 · Cited by 2,701
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Cited by
Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis
Chinn, D. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004 · Cited by 471
Nakayama, K., Osaka, W., Togari, T., Ishikawa, H., Yonekura, Y., Sekido, A., & Matsumoto, M. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x · Cited by 338
Self-citationHsu, W., Chiang, C., & Yang, S. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3542 · Cited by 239
Health literacy studies conducted in Australia: a scoping review
Choudhry, F. R., Ming, L. C., Munawar, K., Zaidi, S. T. R., Patel, R. P., Khan, T. M., & Elmer, S. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16071112 · Cited by 70
Sundell, E., Wångdahl, J., & Grauman, Å. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14751-z · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishikawa, H., Nomura, K., Sato, M., & Yano, E.
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-274
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2109099233
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing a measure of communicative and critical health literacy: a pilot study of Japanese office workers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/heapro/dan017
- The paper
- Ishikawa, H., Nomura, K., Sato, M., & Yano, E. (2008). Developing a measure of communicative and critical health literacy: a pilot study of Japanese office workers. Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dan017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.