The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health literacy revisited: what do we mean and why does it matter?
Open accessAbstract
'Health literacy' refers to accessing, understanding and using information to make health decisions. However, despite its introduction into the World Health Organization's Health Promotion Glossary, the term remains a confusing concept. We consider various definitions and measurements of health literacy in the international and Australian literature, and discuss the distinction between the broader concept of 'health literacy' (applicable to everyday life) and 'medical literacy' (related to individuals as patients within health care settings). We highlight the importance of health literacy in relation to the health promotion and preventive health agenda. Because health literacy involves knowledge, motivation and activation, it is a complex thing to measure and to influence. The development of health literacy policies will be facilitated by better evidence on the extent, patterns and impact of low health literacy, and what might be involved in improving it. However, the current lack of consensus of definitions and measurement of health literacy will first need to be overcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Cited by
Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis
Chinn, D. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004 · Cited by 471
Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress
Nutbeam, D., McGill, B., & Premkumar, P. (2018) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dax015 · Cited by 459
Health literacy in rural and urban populations: A systematic review
Aljassim, N., & Ostini, R. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.007 · Cited by 341
Health literacy studies conducted in Australia: a scoping review
Choudhry, F. R., Ming, L. C., Munawar, K., Zaidi, S. T. R., Patel, R. P., Khan, T. M., & Elmer, S. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16071112 · Cited by 70
Health Literacy and Health Promotion Behaviors of Adolescents in Turkey
Ozturk, F. O., & Ayaz-Alkaya, S. (2020) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2020.04.019 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Peerson, A., & Saunders, M.
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-04-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-296
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2128963424
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health literacy revisited: what do we mean and why does it matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/heapro/dap014
- The paper
- Peerson, A., & Saunders, M. (2009). Health literacy revisited: what do we mean and why does it matter? Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.