The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental health promotion and problem prevention in schools: what does the evidence say?
Abstract
The European Union Dataprev project reviewed work on mental health in four areas, parenting, schools, the workplace and older people. The schools workpackage carried out a systematic review of reviews of work on mental health in schools from which it identified evidence-based interventions and programmes and extracted the general principles from evidence-based work. A systematic search of the literature uncovered 52 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mental health in schools. The interventions identified by the reviews had a wide range of beneficial effects on children, families and communities and on a range of mental health, social, emotional and educational outcomes. The effect sizes associated with most interventions were generally small to moderate in statistical terms, but large in terms of real-world impacts. The effects associated with interventions were variable and their effectiveness could not always be relied on. The characteristics of more effective interventions included: teaching skills, focusing on positive mental health; balancing universal and targeted approaches; starting early with the youngest children and continuing with older ones; operating for a lengthy period of time and embedding work within a multi-modal/whole-school approach which included such features as changes to the curriculum including teaching skills and linking with academic learning, improving school ethos, teacher education, liaison with parents, parenting education, community involvement and coordinated work with outside agencies. Interventions were only effective if they were completely and accurately implemented: this applied particularly to whole-school interventions which could be ineffective if not implemented with clarity, intensity and fidelity. The implications for policy and practice around mental health in schools are discussed, including the suggestion of some rebalancing of priorities and emphases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x · Cited by 10,854 · cited 10×
“(Durlak et al., 2011)*** and Diekstra (Diekstra 2008a) concluded that only when school staff conduct the intervention does student academic performance improve significantly and mental health start to impact on school culture—possibly because school staff are involved in both aspects of school life and can bring it al…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPrimary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review
Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1024654026646 · Cited by 963
School-Based Interventions for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior
Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011 · Cited by 783
A systematic review of universal approaches to mental health promotion in schools
Wells, J., Barlow, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2003) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/09654280310485546 · Cited by 459 · cited 1×
“(Wells et al., 2003)*** concluded that behavioural strategies on their own were unlikely to be effective, and Merry et al.”
BackgroundMerry, S. N., McDowell, H. H., Hetrick, S. E., Bir, J. J., & Muller, N. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003380.pub2 · Cited by 284
School-based secondary prevention programmes for preventing violence
Mytton, J. A., DiGuiseppi, C., Gough, D., Taylor, R. S., & Logan, S. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004606.pub2 · Cited by 166
Preventing Mental Disorders in Children: A Systematic Review to Inform Policy-Making
Waddell, C., Hua, J. M., Garland, O. M., Peters, R. D., & McEwan, K. (2007) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/bf03403706 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12864 · Cited by 2,345
Social determinants of mental health
Allen, J., Balfour, R., Bell, R., & Marmot, M. (2014) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2014.928270 · Cited by 1,411
Barry, M. M., Clarke, A. M., Jenkins, R., & Patel, V. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-835 · Cited by 569
Aldridge, J. M., & McChesney, K. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.012 · Cited by 564
Effectiveness of the Mindfulness in Schools Programme: non-randomised controlled feasibility study
Kuyken, W., Weare, K., Ukoumunne, O. C., Vicary, R., Motton, N., Burnett, R., Cullen, C., Hennelly, S., & Huppert, F. (2013) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126649 · Cited by 427
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weare, K., & Nind, M.
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- i29-i69
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2095680799
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 59.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mental health promotion and problem prevention in schools: what does the evidence say? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/heapro/dar075
- The paper
- Weare, K., & Nind, M. (2011). Mental health promotion and problem prevention in schools: what does the evidence say? Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.