Cited by 963Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSchool Health and Nursing EducationChild Therapy and Development

Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review

Durlak, Joseph A., Wells, Anne M.·1997·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Used meta-analysis to review 177 primary prevention programs designed to prevent behavioral and social problems in children and adolescents. Findings provide empirical support for further research and practice in primary prevention. Most categories of programs produced outcomes similar to or higher in magnitude than those obtained by many other established preventive and treatment interventions in the social sciences and medicine. Programs modifying the school environment, individually focused mental health promotion efforts, and attempts to help children negotiate stressful transitions yield significant mean effects ranging from 0.24 to 0.93. In practical terms, the average participant in a primary prevention program surpasses the performance of between 59% to 82% of those in a control group, and outcomes reflect an 8% to 46% difference in success rates favoring prevention groups. Most categories of programs had the dual benefit of significantly reducing problems and significantly increasing competencies. Priorities for future research include clearer specification of intervention procedures and program goals, assessment of program implementation, more follow-up studies, and determining how characteristics of the intervention and participants relate to different outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024654026646

Cites

202 of 202 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individually focused mental health promotion efforts and attempts to help negotiate stressful transitions yield significant mean effects on reducing problems and increasing competencies.

    “Evidence from a review evaluating primary prevention mental health programs for adolescents suggests that individually focused mental health promotion efforts and attempts to help negotiate stressful transitions yield significant mean effects on reducing problems and increasing competencies [32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
115-152
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W2140854225
Cited by
963
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 53
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
primary prevention, mental health programs, children, adolescents, behavioral problems, social problems, school environment, mental health promotion, intervention effectiveness, program implementation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Humans, Mental Health Services, Primary Prevention, Research Design, Social Problems, Adolescent Health Services, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review