Cited by 51Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health and Patient InvolvementCommunity Health and Development

Peer support for postpartum depression: volunteers' perceptions, recruitment strategies and training from a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Dennis, C.-L.·2013·Health Promotion International

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of telephone-based peer support (mother-to-mother) on preventing postpartum depression among high-risk mothers. This paper reports volunteers' perceptions, which showed that peer support is an effective preventative intervention. Two-hundred and five (205) volunteers were recruited and trained to provide peer support to 349 mothers randomized to the intervention group. Volunteers' perceptions were measured at 12 weeks using the Peer Volunteer Experience Questionnaire, completed by 69% (121) of the 175 volunteers who provided support to at least one mother. Large majorities felt that the training session had prepared them for their role (94.2%), that volunteering did not interfere with their lives (81.8%) and that providing support helped them grow as individuals (87.8%). Over 90% stated that they would become a peer volunteer again, given the opportunity. Recruitment and retention of effective volunteers is essential to the success of any peer-support intervention. Results from this study can assist clinicians and program planners to provide effective training, sufficient on-going support and evaluation and appropriate matching of volunteers to mothers who desire peer support and are at high risk of postpartum depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapro/das003

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have indicated similar factors as the driving force behind volunteering, including willingness to help others, increase in social and personal knowledge, better job prospects, and improved overall wellbeing.

    “Other studies have also indicated similar factors as the driving force behind volunteering. Factors such as willingness to help others [53–56], increase in social and personal knowledge [49, 53], better job prospects [25] and improved overall wellbeing [28] are the common motivators reported by the peers in several studies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hall, M., McKeown, L. and Roberts, K. (2001) Caring Canadians, Involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2000 National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON. Peer support for postpartum depression 195 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article/28/2/187/661577 by guest on 06 July 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dennis, C.-L.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Dennis, C.-L.
Venue
Health Promotion International
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
187-196
ISSN
  • 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2245
OpenAlex
W2114981212
Cited by
51
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (MCT66874)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MCT66874)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
peer support, postpartum depression, mother-to-mother support, telephone-delivered intervention, volunteer recruitment, volunteer retention, volunteer training, volunteer perceptions, high-risk mothers, prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Volunteers, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review