Cited by 83Medication Adherence and ComplianceHealth Education and ValidationSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Assessing medication adherence self-efficacy among low-literacy patients: development of a pictographic visual analogue scale

Kalichman, S. C.·2004·Health Education Research

Abstract

Health behavior interventions are often grounded in Social Cognitive Theory, but instruments used to assess self-efficacy rely on verbal skills and yield scores that are highly positively skewed. Based on a review of the research literature and qualitative research with key informants, a pictographic medication adherence self-efficacy scale was developed. Two studies were conducted to test the pictographic and color visual analogue scale for assessing self-efficacy for medication adherence. Study 1 (N = 81) demonstrated that the pictographic self-efficacy scale was internally consistent (alpha = 0.68), time stable (2-week test-re-test r = 0.63), and showed evidence for convergent and divergent construct validity. Study 2 (N = 64) further supported the reliability of the pictographic self-efficacy scale with additional data supporting its convergent, divergent and criterion-related validity, including associations with medication adherence and HIV viral load. Distributions of self-efficacy scores approximated normal. This newly developed pictographic scale may be useful in assessing medication adherence self-efficacy in lower-literacy populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyg106

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalichman, S. C.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Kalichman, S. C.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2004-07-14
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
24-35
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2153730979
Cited by
83
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH/NR62287)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
medication adherence, self-efficacy, visual analogue scale, low literacy, scale development, social cognitive theory, HIV viral load, psychometric validation, health behavior assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, HIV Infections, Anti-HIV Agents, Viral Load, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review