The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs
Abstract
The field of worksite health promotion has moved toward the development and testing of comprehensive programs that target health behaviors with interventions operating at multiple levels of influence. Yet, observational and process evaluation studies indicate that such programs are challenging for worksites to implement effectively. Research has identified several organizational factors that promote or inhibit effective implementation of comprehensive worksite health promotion programs. However, no integrated theory of implementation has emerged from this research. This article describes a theory of the organizational determinants of effective implementation of comprehensive worksite health promotion programs. The model is adapted from theory and research on the implementation of complex innovations in manufacturing, education and health care settings. The article uses the Working Well Trial to illustrate the model's theoretical constructs. Although the article focuses on comprehensive worksite health promotion programs, the conceptual model may also apply to other types of complex health promotion programs. An organization-level theory of the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“All of these community or organisational characteristics jointly influence implementation climate [14, 15], system readiness for change [14, 17, 67] and capacity for change [15, 62, 68, 69] and thus the chances of an intervention being implemented successfully.”
From Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework (2017) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy
Bandura, A. (2000) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064 · Cited by 3,294
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878 · Cited by 2,451
Sullivan, L. E. (2009) · The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.4135/9781412972024.n747 · Cited by 2,442
The Challenge of Innovation Implementation
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259164 · Cited by 2,113
Organizational Climate and Culture
Ehrhart, M. G. (2016) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Theory in Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781483346274.n219 · Cited by 2,055
Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.8.1261 · Cited by 1,836
(2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781788117449.00005 · Cited by 1,816
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Sorensen, 2006, La Medicina del lavoro, 97, 240
- DeJoy, 1993, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association, 35, 1221
- 2003, WHY DONT WE SEE MORE TRANSLATION OF HEALTH PROMOTION RESEARCH TO PRACTICE RETHINKING THE EFFICACYTOEFFECTIVENESS TRANSITION, 93, 1261
- 1996, Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 21, 1055, 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071863 · DOI · Paper page
- Leape, 1995, JAMA, 274, 35, 10.1001/jama.274.1.35 · DOI · Paper page
- 1995, Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 20, 645, 10.2307/258790 · DOI
- 1985, Harvard business review, 63, 102
- Lang, 1989, Medline Rows With NULL issns Will Point To This, 31, 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A theory of organizational readiness for change
Weiner, B. J. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-67 · Cited by 2,268
Self-citationBridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386
Pfadenhauer, L. M., Gerhardus, A., Mozygemba, K., Lysdahl, K. B., Booth, A., Hofmann, B., Wahlster, P., Polus, S., Burns, J., Brereton, L., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5 · Cited by 1,016
Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure
Shea, C., Jacobs, S., Esserman, D. A., Bruce, K., & Weiner, B. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-7 · Cited by 785
Self-citationFernandez, M. E., Ruiter, R. A. C., Markham, C. M., & Kok, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00209 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiner, B. J., Lewis, M. A., & Linnan, L. A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- RTI International (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weiner, B. J.
- Venue
- Health Education Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-03-21
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 292-305
- ISSN
- 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3648
- OpenAlex
- W2105489923
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- workplace health promotion, program implementation, organizational factors, implementation theory, complex innovation, organizational theory, health behavior interventions
- MeSH terms
- Health Promotion, Humans, Program Development, Workplace, Models, Organizational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
