The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells
Abstract
To fully understand genome function, the linear genome map must be integrated with a spatial map of chromosomes in the nucleus. Distinct nuclear addresses for a few human chromosomes have been described. Previously we have demonstrated that the gene-rich human chromosome 19 is located in a more central position in the nucleus than the similarly sized, but gene-poor, chromosome 18. To determine whether these two chromosomes are a paradigm for the organization of chromatin in the human nucleus, we have now analysed the nuclear organization of every human chromosome in diploid lymphoblasts and primary fibroblasts. We find that the most gene-rich chromosomes concentrate at the centre of the nucleus, whereas the more gene-poor chromosomes are located towards the nuclear periphery. In contrast, we find no significant relationship between chromosome size and position within the nucleus. Proteins of the nuclear membrane or lamina are candidates for molecules that might anchor regions of the genome at the nuclear periphery and it has been suggested that disruption of this organization may play a role in some disease pathologies. We show that the intranuclear organization of chromosomes is not altered in cells that lack the integral nuclear membrane protein emerin, from an individual with X-linked Emery--Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. This suggests that emerin is not necessary for localizing chromosomes at the nuclear periphery and that the muscular dystrophy phenotype in such individuals is not due to grossly altered nuclear organization of chromatin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898
Harnessing nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate
Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3980 · Cited by 1,082
Three-Dimensional Maps of All Chromosomes in Human Male Fibroblast Nuclei and Prometaphase Rosettes
Bolzer, A., Kreth, G., Solovei, I., Koehler, D., Saracoglu, K., Fauth, C., Müller, S., Eils, R., Cremer, C., Speicher, M. R., et al. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030157 · Cited by 837
Genome Architecture: Domain Organization of Interphase Chromosomes
Bickmore, W. A., & van Steensel, B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001 · Cited by 725
Chromatin Motion Is Constrained by Association with Nuclear Compartments in Human Cells
Chubb, J. R., Boyle, S., Perry, P., & Bickmore, W. A. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00695-4 · Cited by 580
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyle, S.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-219
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2162967758
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/10.3.211
- The paper
- Boyle, S. (2001). The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.3.211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.