The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional analysis of BRCA1 C-terminal missense mutations identified in breast and ovarian cancer families
Open accessAbstract
Germline mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 are responsible for the majority of cases involving hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Whereas all truncating mutations are considered as functionally deleterious, most of the missense variants identified to date cannot be readily distinguished as either disease-associated mutations or benign polymorphisms. The C-terminal domain of BRCA1 displays an intrinsic transactivation activity, and mutations linked to disease predisposition have been shown to confer loss of such activity in yeast and mammalian cells. In an attempt to clarify the functional importance of the BRCA1 C-terminus as a transcription activator in cancer predisposition, we have characterized the effect of C-terminal germline variants identified in Scandinavian breast and ovarian cancer families. Missense variants A1669S, C1697R, R1699W, R1699Q, A1708E, S1715R and G1738E and a truncating mutation, W1837X, were characterized using yeast- and mammalian-based transcription assays. In addition, four additional missense variants (V1665M, D1692N, S1715N and D1733G) and one in-frame deletion (V1688del) were included in the study. Our findings demonstrate that transactivation activity may reflect a tumor-suppressing function of BRCA1 and further support the role of BRCA1 missense mutations in disease predisposition. We also report a discrepancy between results from yeast- and mammalian-based assays, indicating that it may not be possible to unambiguously characterize variants with the yeast assay alone. We show that transcription-based assays can aid in the characterization of deleterious mutations in the C-terminal part of BRCA1 and may form the basis of a functional assay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y., Cortez, D., Yazdi, P., Neff, N., Elledge, S. J., & Qin, J. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.8.927 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 1×
“BRCA1 interacts with large protein complexes involved in DNA repair such as Rad51/BRCA2 (10,11) and Rad50/Mre11/ p95 (12,13).”
BackgroundA superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage‐ responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins
Bork, P., Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Neuwald, A. F., Altschul, S. F., & Koonin, E. V. (1997) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.11.1.9034168 · Cited by 746
Genetic Analysis of BRCA1 Function in a Defined Tumor Cell Line
Scully, R., Ganesan, S., Vlasakova, K., Chen, J., Socolovsky, M., & Livingston, D. M. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80238-5 · Cited by 359
Cited by
Structural basis of phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCT domain of BRCA1
Williams, R. S., Lee, M. S., Hau, D. D., & Glover, J. N. M. (2004) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb776 · Cited by 230
Rajendran, B. K., & Deng, C.-X. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17225 · Cited by 73
Glover, J. N. M. (2006) · Familial Cancer · doi:10.1007/s10689-005-2579-z · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallon-Christersson, J.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-360
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2155547021
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional analysis of BRCA1 C-terminal missense mutations identified in breast and ovarian cancer families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/10.4.353
- The paper
- Vallon-Christersson, J. (2001). Functional analysis of BRCA1 C-terminal missense mutations identified in breast and ovarian cancer families. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.4.353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.