The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans
Open accessAbstract
Epistasis, the interaction between genes, is a topic of current interest in molecular and quantitative genetics. A large amount of research has been devoted to the detection and investigation of epistatic interactions. However, there has been much confusion in the literature over definitions and interpretations of epistasis. In this review, we provide a historical background to the study of epistatic interaction effects and point out the differences between a number of commonly used definitions of epistasis. A brief survey of some methods for detecting epistasis in humans is given. We note that the degree to which statistical tests of epistasis can elucidate underlying biological interactions may be more limited than previously assumed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.
Fisher, R. A. (1919) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0080456800012163 · Cited by 4,387
Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF
Robnik-Šikonja, M., & Kononenko, I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1025667309714 · Cited by 3,025
ROTHMAN, K. J., GREENLAND, S., & WALKER, A. M. (1980) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113015 · Cited by 859
Cited by
Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases
Cordell, H. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2579 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationVanderWeele, T. J., & Knol, M. J. (2014) · Epidemiologic Methods · doi:10.1515/em-2013-0005 · Cited by 1,127
Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization
Burgess, S., & Thompson, S. G. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyt093 · Cited by 452
Arnold, P., Rosenberg, D., Mundo, E., Tharmalingam, S., Kennedy, J., & Richter, M. (2004) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1847-1 · Cited by 202
Justice, C. M., Yagnik, G., Kim, Y., Peter, I., Jabs, E. W., Erazo, M., Ye, X., Ainehsazan, E., Shi, L., Cunningham, M. L., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2463 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Cordell, H. J.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2463-2468
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2125858955
- Cited by
- 1,084
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
