The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genomic rearrangements account for more than one-third of the BRCA1 mutations in northern Italian breast/ovarian cancer families
Open accessAbstract
The recent identification of major genomic rearrangements in breast and breast/ovarian cancer families has widened the mutational spectrum of the BRCA1 gene, thus increasing the number of informative patients who can benefit from molecular screening. Numerous types of alterations have been identified in different populations with variable frequencies, probably due to both ethnic diversity and the technical approach employed. In fact, although several methods have been successfully used to detect large genomic deletions and insertions, most are laborious, time-consuming, and of variable sensitivity. In order to estimate the contribution of BRCA1 genomic rearrangements to breast/ovarian cancer predisposition in Italian families, we applied, for the first time as a diagnostic tool, the recently described multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) methodology. Among the 37 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) families selected, all had a high prior probability of BRCA1 mutation, and 15 were previously shown to carry a mutation in either the BRCA2 (five families) or BRCA1 gene (10 families, including one genomic rearrangement). The application of BRCA1-MLPA to the remaining 22 uninformative families allowed the identification of five additional genomic rearrangements. Moreover, we observed that loss of constitutive heterozygosity of polymorphic markers in linkage disequilibrium is predictive of such BRCA1 alterations. By means of this approach, we demonstrate that BRCA1 genomic deletions account for more than one-third (6/15) of the pathogenic BRCA1 mutations in our series. We therefore propose to systematically include MLPA in the BRCA1 mutational analysis of breast/ovarian cancer families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spectrum of Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in Families at High Risk of Breast Cancer
Walsh, T., Casadei, S., Coats, K. H., Swisher, E., Stray, S. M., Higgins, J., Roach, K. C., Mandell, J., Lee, M. K., Ciernikova, S., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.12.1379 · Cited by 666
Copy number variations and cancer
Shlien, A., & Malkin, D. (2009) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm62 · Cited by 386
MLPA and MAPH: New techniques for detection of gene deletions
Sellner, L. N., & Taylor, G. R. (2004) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20035 · Cited by 291
Dosage analysis of cancer predisposition genes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Bunyan, D. J., Eccles, D. M., Sillibourne, J., Wilkins, E., Thomas, N. S., Shea-Simonds, J., Duncan, P. J., Curtis, C. E., Robinson, D. O., Harvey, J. F., et al. (2004) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602121 · Cited by 264
Copy number variations and cancer susceptibility
Shlien, A., & Malkin, D. (2010) · Current Opinion in Oncology · doi:10.1097/cco.0b013e328333dca4 · Cited by 77
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Montagna, M.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1055-1061
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2163066822
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic rearrangements account for more than one-third of the BRCA1 mutations in northern Italian breast/ovarian cancer families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/ddg120
- The paper
- Montagna, M. (2003). Genomic rearrangements account for more than one-third of the BRCA1 mutations in northern Italian breast/ovarian cancer families. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddg120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.