The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectrum of Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in Families at High Risk of Breast Cancer
Abstract
CONTEXT: Genetic testing for inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 has become integral to the care of women with a severe family history of breast or ovarian cancer, but an unknown number of patients receive negative (ie, wild-type) results when they actually carry a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Furthermore, other breast cancer genes generally are not evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and types of undetected cancer-predisposing mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, TP53, and PTEN among patients with breast cancer from high-risk families with negative (wild-type) genetic test results for BRCA1 and BRCA2. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2002-2005, probands from 300 US families with 4 or more cases of breast or ovarian cancer but with negative (wild-type) commercial genetic test results for BRCA1 and BRCA2 were screened by multiple DNA-based and RNA-based methods to detect genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and germline mutations of all classes in CHEK2, TP53, and PTEN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Previously undetected germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, TP53, and PTEN that predispose to breast cancer; frequencies of these mutations among families with negative genetic test results. RESULTS: Of the 300 probands, 52 (17%) carried previously undetected mutations, including 35 (12%) with genomic rearrangements of BRCA1 or BRCA2, 14 (5%) with CHEK2 mutations, and 3 (1%) with TP53 mutations. At BRCA1 and BRCA2, 22 different genomic rearrangements were found, of sizes less than 1 kb to greater than 170 kb; of these, 14 were not previously described and all were individually rare. At CHEK2, a novel 5.6-kb genomic deletion was discovered in 2 families of Czechoslovakian ancestry. This deletion was found in 8 of 631 (1.3%) patients with breast cancer and in none of 367 healthy controls in the Czech and Slovak Republics. For all rearrangements, exact genomic breakpoints were determined and diagnostic primers validated. The 3 families with TP53 mutations included cases of childhood sarcoma or brain tumors in addition to multiple cases of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The mutational spectra of BRCA1 and BRCA2 include many high-penetrance, individually rare genomic rearrangements. Among patients with breast cancer and severe family histories of cancer who test negative (wild type) for BRCA1 and BRCA2, approximately 12% can be expected to carry a large genomic deletion or duplication in one of these genes, and approximately 5% can be expected to carry a mutation in CHEK2 or TP53. Effective methods for identifying these mutations should be made available to women at high risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Due to Inherited Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2
King, M.-C., Marks, J. H., & Mandell, J. B. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088759 · Cited by 2,229
Self-citationESEfinder: a web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers
Cartegni, L. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg616 · Cited by 1,603
Soft-Tissue Sarcomas, Breast Cancer, and Other Neoplasms: A Familial Syndrome?
LI, F. P., & FRAUMENI, J. F. (1969) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-71-4-747 · Cited by 1,509
Prophylactic Oophorectomy in Carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations
Rebbeck, T. R., Lynch, H. T., Neuhausen, S. L., Narod, S. A., van't Veer, L., Garber, J. E., Evans, G., Isaacs, C., Daly, M. B., Matloff, E., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012158 · Cited by 1,465
Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
Kauff, N. D., Satagopan, J. M., Robson, M. E., Scheuer, L., Hensley, M., Hudis, C. A., Ellis, N. A., Boyd, J., Borgen, P. I., Barakat, R. R., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020119 · Cited by 1,251
The CHEK2-Breast Cancer Consortium (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng879 · Cited by 1,104
Risch, H. A., McLaughlin, J. R., Cole, D. E. C., Rosen, B., Bradley, L., Kwan, E., Jack, E., Vesprini, D. J., Kuperstein, G., Abrahamson, J. L. A., et al. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/318787 · Cited by 986
Breast Cancer after Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
Meijers-Heijboer, H., van Geel, B., van Putten, W. L. J., Henzen-Logmans, S. C., Seynaeve, C., Menke-Pluymers, M. B. E., Bartels, C. C. M., Verhoog, L. C., van den Ouweland, A. M. W., Niermeijer, M. F., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107193450301 · Cited by 973 · cited 3×
“Clinical options for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer include screening starting at a young age,(19) the use of highly sensitive detection methods,(20) and prophylactic surgeries of the ovaries or breast.(21-27) Because prophylactic surgeries, while highly effective in reducing risk, are also highly invasiv…”
BackgroundBurke, W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.12.997 · Cited by 955
Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations in Patients With Early-Onset Breast Cancer
Peto, J., Collins, N., Barfoot, R., Seal, S., Warren, W., Rahman, N., Easton, D. F., Evans, C., Deacon, J., & Stratton, M. R. (1999) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/91.11.943 · Cited by 873
Cited by
Walsh, T., Casadei, S., Lee, M. K., Pennil, C. C., Nord, A. S., Thornton, A. M., Roeb, W., Agnew, K. J., Stray, S. M., Wickramanayake, A., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1115052108 · Cited by 933
Self-citationGenome-wide association study identifies a new breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q25.1
Zheng, W., Long, J., Gao, Y.-T., Li, C., Zheng, Y., Xiang, Y.-B., Wen, W., Levy, S., Deming, S. L., Haines, J. L., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.318 · Cited by 541
Health and Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer
Yedjou, C. G., Sims, J. N., Miele, L., Noubissi, F., Lowe, L., Fonseca, D. D., Alo, R. A., Payton, M., & Tchounwou, P. B. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_3 · Cited by 509
Ten Genes for Inherited Breast Cancer
Walsh, T., & King, M.-C. (2007) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2007.01.010 · Cited by 477
Self-citationBodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, T., Casadei, S., Coats, K. H., Swisher, E., Stray, S. M., Higgins, J., Roach, K. C., Mandell, J., Lee, M. K., Ciernikova, S., Foretova, L., Soucek, P., & King, M.-C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2006-03-22
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1379
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2120059431
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 30.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrum of Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in Families at High Risk of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.295.12.1379
- The paper
- Walsh, T., Casadei, S., Coats, K. H., Swisher, E., Stray, S. M., Higgins, J., Roach, K. C., Mandell, J., Lee, M. K., Ciernikova, S., Foretova, L., Soucek, P., & King, M.-C. (2006). Spectrum of Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in Families at High Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.12.1379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.