The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel functional VKORC1 promoter polymorphism is associated with inter-individual and inter-ethnic differences in warfarin sensitivity
Abstract
Warfarin, a commonly prescribed anticoagulant, exhibited large inter-individual and inter-ethnic differences in the dose required for its anticoagulation effect. Asian populations, including Chinese, require a much lower maintenance dose than Caucasians, for which the mechanisms still remain unknown. We determined DNA sequence variants in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 in 16 Chinese patients having warfarin sensitivity (< or = 1.5 mg/day, n = 11) or resistance (> or = 6.0 mg/day, n = 5), 104 randomly selected Chinese patients receiving warfarin, 95 normal Chinese controls and 92 normal Caucasians. We identified three CYP2C9 variants, CYP2C9*3, T299A and P382L, in four warfarin-sensitive patients. A novel VKORC1 promoter polymorphism (-1639 G > A) presented in the homozygous form (genotype AA) was found in all warfarin-sensitive patients. The resistant patients were either AG or GG. Among the 104 randomly selected Chinese patients receiving warfarin, AA genotype also had lower dose than the AG/GG genotype (P < 0.0001). Frequencies of AA, AG and GG genotypes were comparable in Chinese patients receiving warfarin (79.7, 17.6 and 2.7%) and normal Chinese controls (82, 18 and 0%), but differed significantly from Caucasians (14, 47 and 39%) (P < 0.0001). The promoter polymorphism abolished the E-box consensus sequences and dual luciferase assay revealed that VOKRC1 promoter with the G allele had a 44% increase of activity when compared with the A allele. The differences in allele frequencies of A/G allele and its levels of VKORC1 promoter activity may underscore the inter-individual differences in warfarin dosage as well as inter-ethnic differences between Chinese and Caucasians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome
Ashley, E. A., Butte, A. J., Wheeler, M. T., Chen, R., Klein, T. E., Dewey, F. E., Dudley, J. T., Ormond, K. E., Pavlovic, A., Morgan, A. A., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60452-7 · Cited by 674
Takahashi, H., Wilkinson, G. R., Nutescu, E. A., Morita, T., Ritchie, M. D., Scordo, M. G., Pengo, V., Barban, M., Padrini, R., Ieiri, I., et al. (2006) · Pharmacogenetics and Genomics · doi:10.1097/01.fpc.0000184955.08453.a8 · Cited by 376
AQUILANTE, C., LANGAEE, T., LOPEZ, L., YARANDI, H., TROMBERG, J., MOHUCZY, D., GASTON, K., WADDELL, C., CHIRICO, M., & JOHNSON, J. (2006) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2005.11.011 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, H.-Y., Chen, J.-J., Lee, M. T. M., Wung, J.-C., Chen, Y.-F., Charng, M.-J., Lu, M.-J., Hung, C.-R., Wei, C.-Y., Chen, C.-H., Wu, J.-Y., & Chen, Y.-T.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1745-1751
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2102553995
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel functional VKORC1 promoter polymorphism is associated with inter-individual and inter-ethnic differences in warfarin sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/ddi180
- The paper
- Yuan, H.-Y., Chen, J.-J., Lee, M. T. M., Wung, J.-C., Chen, Y.-F., Charng, M.-J., Lu, M.-J., Hung, C.-R., Wei, C.-Y., Chen, C.-H., Wu, J.-Y., & Chen, Y.-T. (2005). A novel functional VKORC1 promoter polymorphism is associated with inter-individual and inter-ethnic differences in warfarin sensitivity. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.