The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An increased specificity score matrix for the prediction of SF2/ASF-specific exonic splicing enhancers
Abstract
Numerous disease-associated point mutations exert their effects by disrupting the activity of exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs). We previously derived position weight matrices to predict putative ESEs specific for four human SR proteins. The score matrices are part of ESEfinder, an online resource to identify ESEs in query sequences. We have now carried out a refined functional SELEX screen for motifs that can act as ESEs in response to the human SR protein SF2/ASF. The test BRCA1 exon under selection was internal, rather than the 3'-terminal IGHM exon used in our earlier studies. A naturally occurring heptameric ESE in BRCA1 exon 18 was replaced with two libraries of random sequences, one seven nucleotides in length, the other 14. Following three rounds of selection for in vitro splicing via internal exon inclusion, new consensus motifs and score matrices were derived. Many winner sequences were demonstrated to be functional ESEs in S100-extract-complementation assays with recombinant SF2/ASF. Motif-score threshold values were derived from both experimental and statistical analyses. Motif scores were shown to correlate with levels of exon inclusion, both in vitro and in vivo. Our results confirm and extend our earlier data, as many of the same motifs are recognized as ESEs by both the original and our new score matrix, despite the different context used for selection. Finally, we have derived an increased specificity score matrix that incorporates information from both of our SF2/ASF-specific matrices and that accurately predicts the exon-skipping phenotypes of deleterious point mutations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gilbert, W. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/319618a0 · Cited by 2,721
Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing
Cartegni, L., Chew, S. L., & Krainer, A. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg775 · Cited by 2,209
Self-citation
Cited by
DeJesus-Hernandez, M., Mackenzie, I. R., Boeve, B. F., Boxer, A. L., Baker, M., Rutherford, N. J., Nicholson, A. M., Finch, N. A., Flynn, H., Adamson, J., et al. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011 · Cited by 4,936
Splicing in disease: disruption of the splicing code and the decoding machinery
Wang, G.-S., & Cooper, T. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2164 · Cited by 1,050
Splicing mutations in human genetic disorders: Examples, detection, and confirmation
Anna, A., & Monika, G. (2018) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-018-0444-7 · Cited by 657
Gene editing restores dystrophin expression in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Amoasii, L., Hildyard, J. C. W., Li, H., Sanchez-Ortiz, E., Mireault, A., Caballero, D., Harron, R., Stathopoulou, T.-R., Massey, C., Shelton, J. M., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau1549 · Cited by 546
CD33 Alzheimer’s risk-altering polymorphism, CD33 expression, and exon 2 splicing
Malik, M., Simpson, J. F., Parikh, I., Wilfred, B. R., Fardo, D. W., Nelson, P. T., & Estus, S. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1224-13.2013 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, P. J., Zhang, C., Wang, J., Chew, S. L., Zhang, M. Q., & Krainer, A. R.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-07-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2490-2508
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2147781659
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An increased specificity score matrix for the prediction of SF2/ASF-specific exonic splicing enhancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/ddl171
- The paper
- Smith, P. J., Zhang, C., Wang, J., Chew, S. L., Zhang, M. Q., & Krainer, A. R. (2006). An increased specificity score matrix for the prediction of SF2/ASF-specific exonic splicing enhancers. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.