Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Restriction landmark genome scanning identifies culture-induced DNA methylation instability in the human embryonic stem cell epigenome

Allegrucci, Cinzia, Wu, Yue-Zhong, Thurston, Alexandra, Denning, Chris N., Priddle, Helen, Mummery, Christine L., Ward-van Oostwaard, Dorien, Andrews, Peter W., Stojkovic, Miodrag, Smith, Nigel, Parkin, Tony, Jones, Mark Edmondson, Warren, Graham, Yu, Li, Brena, Romulo Martin, Plass, Christoph, Young, Lorraine E.·2007·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Widespread provision of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) for therapeutic use, drug screening and disease modelling will require cell lines sustainable over long periods in culture. Since the short-term, in vitro culture of mammalian embryos can result in DNA methylation changes, the epigenetic stability of hESCs warrants investigation. Existing hESC lines have been derived and cultured under diverse conditions, providing the potential for programming differential changes into the epigenome that may result in inter-line variability over and above that inherited from the embryo. By examining the DNA methylation profiles of > 2000 genomic loci by Restriction Landmark Genome Scanning, we identified substantial inter-line epigenetic distance between six independently derived hESC lines. Lines were found to inherit further epigenetic changes over time in culture, with most changes arising in the earliest stages post-derivation. The loci affected varied between lines. The majority of culture-induced changes (82.3-87.5%) were stably inherited both within the undifferentiated cells and post-differentiation. Adapting a line to a serum-free culture system resulted in additional epigenetic instability. Overall 80.5% of the unstable loci uncovered in hESCs have been associated previously with an adult tumour phenotype. Our study shows that current methods of hESC propagation can rapidly programme stable and unpredictable epigenetic changes in the stem cell genome. This highlights the need for (i) novel screening strategies to determine the experimental utility and biosafety of hESCs and (ii) optimization and standardization of procedures for the derivation and culture of hESC lines that minimize culture-induced instability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddm074

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Allegrucci, C., Wu, Y.-Z., Thurston, A., Denning, C. N., Priddle, H., Mummery, C. L., Ward-van Oostwaard, D., Andrews, P. W., Stojkovic, M., Smith, N., Parkin, T., Jones, M. E., Warren, G., Yu, L., Brena, R. M., Plass, C., & Young, L. E.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2007-04-04
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1253-1268
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2123667649
Cited by
158
References
4
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restriction landmark genome scanning identifies culture-induced DNA methylation instability in the human embryonic stem cell epigenome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/ddm074
The paper
Allegrucci, C., Wu, Y.-Z., Thurston, A., Denning, C. N., Priddle, H., Mummery, C. L., Ward-van Oostwaard, D., Andrews, P. W., Stojkovic, M., Smith, N., Parkin, T., Jones, M. E., Warren, G., Yu, L., Brena, R. M., Plass, C., & Young, L. E. (2007). Restriction landmark genome scanning identifies culture-induced DNA methylation instability in the human embryonic stem cell epigenome. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddm074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.