Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mechanistic insight into the dominant mode of the Parkinson's disease-associated G2019S LRRK2 mutation

Luzon-Toro, B., de la Torre, E. R., Delgado, A., Perez-Tur, J., Hilfiker, S.·2007·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Pathogenic mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase-2 (LRRK2) gene cause autosomal-dominant and certain cases of sporadic Parkinson's disease (PD). The G2019S substitution in LRRK2 is the most common genetic determinant of PD identified so far, and maps to a specific region of the kinase domain called the activation segment. Here, we show that autophosphorylation of LRRK2 is an intermolecular reaction and targets two residues within the activation segment. The prominent pathogenic G2019S mutation in LRRK2 results in altered autophosphorylation, and increased autophosphorylation and substrate phosphorylation, through a process that seems to involve reorganization of the activation segment. Our results suggest a molecular mechanistic explanation for how the G2019S mutation enhances the catalytic activity of LRRK2, thereby leading to pathogenicity. These findings have important implications for therapeutic strategies in PD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddm151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Luzon-Toro, B., de la Torre, E. R., Delgado, A., Perez-Tur, J., & Hilfiker, S.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2007-06-25
Volume
16
Issue
17
Pages
2031-2039
ISSN
  • 0964-6906
  • 1460-2083
Cited by
122
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review