Cited by 145Corneal surgery and disordersGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGlaucoma and retinal disorders

New loci associated with central cornea thickness include COL5A1, AKAP13 and AVGR8

Vitart, Veronique, Benčić, Goran, Hayward, Caroline, Škunca Herman, Jelena, Huffman, Jennifer, Campbell, Susan, Bućan, Kajo, Navarro, Pau +13 more·2010·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Central corneal thickness (CCT) is a highly heritable trait, which has been proposed to influence disorders of the anterior segment of the eye. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of CCT was performed in 2269 individuals from three Croatian and one Scottish population. In the discovery set (1445 individuals), two genome-wide significant associations were identified for single nucleotide polymorphisms rs12447690 (β = 0.23 SD, P = 4.4 × 10(-9)) and rs1536482 (β = 0.22 SD, P = 7.1 × 10(-8)) for which the closest candidate genes (although ≥90 kb away) were zinc finger 469 (ZNF469) on 16q24.2 and collagen 5 alpha 1 (COL5A1) on 9q34.2, respectively. Only the ZNF469 association was confirmed in our replication set (824 individuals, P = 8.0 × 10(-4)) but COL5A1 remained a suggestive association in the combined sample (β = 0.16 SD, P = 1.1 × 10(-6)). Following a larger meta-analysis including recently published CCT GWAS summary data, COL5A1 was genome-wide significant (β = 0.13 SD, P = 5.1 × 10(-8)), together with two additional novel loci. The second new locus (defined by rs1034200) was 5 kb from the AVGR8 gene, encoding a putative transcription factor with typical ZNF and KRAB domains, in chromosomal region 13q12.11 (β = 0.14 SD, P = 3.5 × 10(-9)). The third new locus (rs6496932), on 15q25.3 (β = 0.13, P = 1.4 × 10(-8)), was within a wide linkage disequilibrium block extending into the 5' end of the AKAP13 gene, encoding a scaffold protein concerned with signal transduction from…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddq349

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genome-wide association studies have consistently associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vicinity of the ZNF469 locus with central corneal thickness (CCT).

    “Genome-wide association studies have consistently associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vicinity of the ZNF469 locus with central corneal thickness (CTT) [Lu et al., 2010;Vitart et al., 2010;Vithana et al., 2011;Hoehn et al., 2012;Ulmer et al., 2012]”

    From The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types (2017) · cites this paper as Vitart et al., 2010

  • Expression profiling studies suggest that both PRDM5 and ZNF469 might be part of a common pathway regulating the expression of ECM genes such as fibrillary collagens, and several studies have suggested a role for ZNF469 in normal corneal development.

    “In addition, expression profiling studies suggest that both PRDM5 and ZNF469 might be part of a common pathway regulating the expression of ECM genes such as fibrillary collagens, and several studies have suggested a role for ZNF469 normal corneal development [Lu et al., 2010;Vitart et al., 2010;Vithana et al., 2011;Rohrbach et al., 2013].”

    From The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types (2017) · cites this paper as Vitart et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vitart, V., Benčić, G., Hayward, C., Škunca Herman, J., Huffman, J., Campbell, S., Bućan, K., Navarro, P., Gunjaca, G., Marin, J., Zgaga, L., Kolčić, I., Polašek, O., Kirin, M., Hastie, N. D., Wilson, J. F., Rudan, I., Campbell, H., Vatavuk, Z., Fleck, B., & Wright, A.
Affiliations
  • Sisters of Charity Hospital (HR)
  • Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
  • University of Split (HR)
  • University of Zagreb (HR)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion (GB)
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2010-08-18
Volume
19
Issue
21
Pages
4304-4311
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2100298873
Cited by
145
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
central corneal thickness, COL5A1, AKAP13, ZNF469, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genome-wide association study, genetic susceptibility, primary open-angle glaucoma, keratoconus, anterior segment disorders, type V collagen, transcription factors, linkage disequilibrium, meta-analysis, Croatian population, Scottish population
MeSH terms
Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Cohort Studies, Minor Histocompatibility Antigens, Epithelium, Corneal, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Collagen Type V, A Kinase Anchor Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review