Genome-wide quantitative trait loci mapping of the human cerebrospinal fluid proteome
Open accessAbstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is virtually the only one accessible source of proteins derived from the central nervous system (CNS) of living humans and possibly reflects the pathophysiology of a variety of neuropsychiatric diseases. However, little is known regarding the genetic basis of variation in protein levels of human CSF. We examined CSF levels of 1,126 proteins in 133 subjects and performed a genome-wide association analysis of 514,227 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to detect protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs). To be conservative, Spearman's correlation was used to identify an association between genotypes of SNPs and protein levels. A total of 421 cis and 25 trans SNP-protein pairs were significantly correlated at a false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 0.01 (nominal P < 7.66 × 10-9). Cis-only analysis revealed additional 580 SNP-protein pairs with FDR < 0.01 (nominal P < 2.13 × 10-5). pQTL SNPs were more likely, compared to non-pQTL SNPs, to be a disease/trait-associated variants identified by previous genome-wide association studies. The present findings suggest that genetic variations play an important role in the regulation of protein expression in the CNS. The obtained database may serve as a valuable resource to understand the genetic bases for CNS protein expression pattern in humans.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This dataset represents an expansion of previous CSF pQTL work in both sample size (n=3,506) and number of proteins (n=6,361).
“This dataset represents an expansion of previous CSF pQTL work10,16–19 in both sample size (n=3,506) and number of proteins (n=6,361).”
From Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kauwe, J. S. K., Bailey, M. H., Ridge, P. G., Perry, R., Wadsworth, M. E., Hoyt, K. L., Staley, L. A., Karch, C. M., Harari, O., Cruchaga, C., et al. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004758 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of gene expression quantitative trait loci in brain
Kim, Y., Xia, K., Tao, R., Giusti-Rodriguez, P., Vladimirov, V, van den Oord, E., & Sullivan, P. F. (2014) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2014.96 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Gamazon, E.R., Zhang, W., Konkashbaev, A., Duan, S., Kistner, E.O., Nicolae, D.L., Dolan, M.E. and Cox, N.J. (2010) SCAN: SNP and copy number annotation. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26, 259-262.
- Johnson, A.D., Handsaker, R.E., Pulit, S.L., Nizzari, M.M., O'Donnell, C.J. and de Bakker, P.I. (2008) SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 24, 2938-2939.
- American Psychiatric Association (1994) DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th edition. American Psychiatric Press, Washington D.C.
- Shabalin, A.A. (2012) Matrix eQTL: ultra fast eQTL analysis via large matrix operations. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 28, 1353-1358.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetics meets proteomics: perspectives for large population-based studies
Suhre, K., McCarthy, M. I., & Schwenk, J. M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0268-2 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Yang, C., Farias, F. H. G., Ibanez, L., Suhy, A., Sadler, B., Fernandez, M. V., Wang, F., Bradley, J. L., Eiffert, B., Bahena, J. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00886-6 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Systemic factors as mediators of brain homeostasis, ageing and neurodegeneration
Pluvinage, J. V., & Wyss-Coray, T. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0255-9 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Depression and Interleukin-6 Signaling: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Kelly, K. M., Smith, J. A., & Mezuk, B. (2021) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.02.019 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Western, D., Timsina, J., Wang, L., Wang, C., Yang, C., Phillips, B., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Ali, M., Beric, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01972-8 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Hillary, R. F., McCartney, D. L., Harris, S. E., Stevenson, A. J., Seeboth, A., Zhang, Q., Liewald, D. C., Evans, K. L., Ritchie, C. W., Tucker-Drob, E. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11177-x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid
Hansson, O., Kumar, A., Janelidze, S., Stomrud, E., Insel, P. S., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Fauman, E., Hedman, Å. K., Nagle, M. W., et al. (2023) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.202216359 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sasayama, D., Hattori, K., Ogawa, S., Yokota, Y., Matsumura, R., Teraishi, T., Hori, H., Ota, M., Yoshida, S., & Kunugi, H.
- Affiliations
- Shinshu University (JP)
- National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
- National Center Hospital of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kunugi, Hiroshi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-12-27
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- ddw366
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2566053961
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (15dk0310061h0001, 16dk0307062h0001, 24-11)
- National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (24-11, 25253075)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K19719, 26461731)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- cerebrospinal fluid proteome, protein quantitative trait loci, single nucleotide polymorphisms, neurodegenerative disease biomarkers, human genetic variation
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Phenotype, Biomarkers, Genome, Human, Proteome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Protein Array Analysis, Quantitative Trait Loci, Proteomics, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review