Genomic atlas of the proteome from brain, CSF and plasma prioritizes proteins implicated in neurological disorders
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Understanding the tissue-specific genetic controls of protein levels is essential to uncover mechanisms of post-transcriptional gene regulation. In this study, we generated a genomic atlas of protein levels in three tissues relevant to neurological disorders (brain, cerebrospinal fluid and plasma) by profiling thousands of proteins from participants with and without Alzheimer’s disease. We identified 274, 127 and 32 protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) for cerebrospinal fluid, plasma and brain, respectively. cis-pQTLs were more likely to be tissue shared, but trans-pQTLs tended to be tissue specific. Between 48.0% and 76.6% of pQTLs did not co-localize with expression, splicing, DNA methylation or histone acetylation QTLs. Using Mendelian randomization, we nominated proteins implicated in neurological diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and stroke. This first multi-tissue study will be instrumental to map signals from genome-wide association studies onto functional genes, to discover pathways and to identify drug targets for neurological diseases. Yang et al. generated a genomic atlas of protein levels in brain, cerebrospinal fluid and plasma and used human genetics approaches to identify proteins implicated in neurological diseases as well as druggable targets.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study generated a multi-tissue protein quantitative trait locus (pQTL) atlas from brain, CSF, and plasma in participants with and without Alzheimer disease (AD). It identified tissue-shared and tissue-specific pQTLs, showed many pQTLs do not colocalize with other molecular QTLs, and used Mendelian randomization (MR) to prioritize proteins and drug targets for neurological disorders.
Key findings
- The study identified 274 independent pQTLs for 184 CSF proteins, 127 for 100 plasma proteins, and 32 for 27 brain proteins. Cis associations accounted for 82% of CSF, 76% of plasma, and 94% of brain pQTLs; trans associations accounted for 18%, 24%, and 6%, respectively, and 91.5–98.9% of trans-pQTLs were inter-chromosomal.
- Cis-pQTLs were more likely to be tissue-shared, whereas trans-pQTLs were more tissue-specific: 15–26% of cis-pQTLs were tissue-specific versus 77–91% of trans-pQTLs. CSF and plasma each shared more than 70% of brain pQTLs.
- Between 48.0% (brain) and 76.6% (CSF) of pQTLs did not colocalize with expression, splicing, DNA-methylation, or histone-acetylation QTLs. Only 13.3–33.3% of pQTLs colocalized with GTEx cortex eQTLs and 14.2–17.5% with GTEx whole-blood eQTLs at PP.H4 > 0.8.
- MR nominated proteins implicated in neurological diseases, including three CSF, 13 plasma, and seven brain proteins for AD risk, and proteins such as plasma CD33 for AD, plasma IDUA for Parkinson’s disease, CSF Carbonic Anhydrase IV for ALS, and CSF/plasma E-Selectin for stroke. The study identified 25 drugs known to interact with MR-prioritized proteins.
Methods
- Aptamer-based proteomics measured 1,305 proteins in CSF (n = 971), plasma (n = 636), and brain parietal lobe cortex (n = 458) samples from participants of European ancestry, including AD cases and cognitively normal individuals. After QC, analyses included 835 CSF samples/713 proteins, 529 plasma samples/931 proteins, and 380 brain samples/1,079 proteins.
- Genome-wide association analyses tested 14.06 million imputed autosomal common variants (MAF ≥ 0.02) against protein levels, with cis defined as within 1 Mb of the gene start site and trans as outside a 2 Mb window. Significance thresholds were p < 5×10−8 for cis-pQTLs and study-wide thresholds for trans-pQTLs: 2.96×10−10 for CSF, 2.17×10−10 for plasma, and 6.67×10−10 for brain.
- The study used conditional analyses, replication and meta-analyses with independent datasets, mashr for tissue specificity, colocalization with eQTL/sQTL/mQTL/hQTL data, MR with TwoSampleMR, and DrugBank for drug repositioning.
Limitations
- The paper states that the aptamer-based platform may be confounded by recognition differences rather than true protein abundance changes, and that coding-variant enrichment could be biased by the platform. It also notes that non-coding pQTLs may remain undetected due to limited statistical power, that colocalization results cannot be extrapolated to all coding genes, and that brain pQTLs came from parietal lobe cortex while GTEx eQTLs came from whole cortex.
- The paper states that MR cannot fully account for horizontal pleiotropy, although pleiotropic regions were removed, and that protein–neurological disease associations may not be disease-specific, as associations with asthma risk were also observed. It calls for additional studies in more tissues and with more proteins.
- Evident from the text: sample sizes and case/control composition differ substantially across tissues, and the brain control-only analysis had a much smaller sample size (24 controls), which the authors note produced a relatively low correlation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
91.5% to 98.9% of trans-pQTLs were inter-chromosomal.
“We found that 91.5 to 98.9% of the trans-pQTLs were inter-chromosomal (Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The number of significant pQTLs was proportional to sample size rather than the number of proteins.
“The number of significant pQTLs was proportional to the sample size, rather than the number of proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CSF, 82% of the 274 significant associations were cis and 18% were trans.
“Of the 274 significant associations in CSF, 82% were cis associations and 18% were trans associations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the second round of conditional analyses, 23 CSF, 6 plasma, and 1 brain loci still showed independent and genome-wide significant associations.
“In the second round, 23 CSF, 6 plasma, and 1 brain loci still showed independent and genome-wide significant associations (Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain, 94% of significant associations were cis and 6% were trans.
“Lastly, in brain, 94% were cis associations and 6% were trans associations (Fig. 1b,c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Using Mendelian randomization, the study nominated proteins implicated in neurological diseases, including Alzheimer disease, Parkinson's disease, or stroke.
“Using Mendelian randomization (MR), we nominated proteins implicated in neurological diseases, including AD, Parkinson’s disease or stroke.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, 76% of significant associations were cis and 24% were trans.
“In plasma, 76% were cis associations and 24% were trans associations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cis-pQTLs were more likely to be tissue-shared than trans-pQTLs.
“Cis-pQTLs were more likely to be tissue-shared, but trans-pQTLs tended to be tissue-specific.”
- Also stated in: § Tissue-specificity investigation · hedged
“This analysis indicated that cis-pQTLs were more likely to be shared across tissues than trans-pQTLs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Tissue-specificity investigation · hedged
- Findingown data
Trans-pQTLs tended to be tissue-specific.
“Cis-pQTLs were more likely to be tissue-shared, but trans-pQTLs tended to be tissue-specific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified 127 independent pQTLs for plasma proteins.
“We identified 274, 127, and 32 protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively.”
- Also stated in: § Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs · plain
“In total, we identified 274 significant independent pQTLs for 184 CSF proteins, 127 independent pQTLs for 100 plasma proteins, and 32 independent pQTLs for 27 brain proteins (Fig. 1b,c, Tables S3, S4, S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs · plain
- Findingown data
The study generated a genomic atlas of protein levels in brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma by profiling thousands of proteins from participants with and without Alzheimer disease.
“We generated a genomic atlas of protein levels in three tissues relevant to neurological disorders (brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma), by profiling thousands of proteins from participants with and without Alzheimer disease (AD).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified 32 independent pQTLs for brain proteins.
“We identified 274, 127, and 32 protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively.”
- Also stated in: § Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs · plain
“In total, we identified 274 significant independent pQTLs for 184 CSF proteins, 127 independent pQTLs for 100 plasma proteins, and 32 independent pQTLs for 27 brain proteins (Fig. 1b,c, Tables S3, S4, S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs · plain
- Findingown data
The study identified 274 independent protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) for CSF proteins.
“We identified 274, 127, and 32 protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively.”
- Also stated in: § Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs · plain
“In total, we identified 274 significant independent pQTLs for 184 CSF proteins, 127 independent pQTLs for 100 plasma proteins, and 32 independent pQTLs for 27 brain proteins (Fig. 1b,c, Tables S3, S4, S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs · plain
- Findingown data
The main signal for CSF ARTS1 was primarily associated with the nonsynonymous variant p.R725Q (rs17482078, p-value = 8.64×10−95).
“As an example of these complex regions, the main signal for CSF ARTS1 (Fig. 2b) was primarily associated with the nonsynonymous variant p.R725Q (rs17482078, p-value = 8.64×10−95).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Between 48.0% and 76.6% of pQTLs did not colocalize with expression, splicing, DNA-methylation, or histone-acetylation QTLs.
“Between 48.0 to 76.6% of pQTLs did not colocalize with expression, splicing, DNA-methylation, or histone-acetylation QTLs.”
- Also stated in: § Colocalization of pQTLs with other molecular QTLs · plain
“Overall, between 48 (brain) to 76.6% (CSF) of pQTLs identified in this study did not colocalize with QTLs for expression, splicing, DNA-methylation, or histone-acetylation, suggesting that protein level may help explain some missing heritability of disease when integrated with other molecular traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Colocalization of pQTLs with other molecular QTLs · plain
- Findingown data
After the first round of conditional analyses, 55 CSF, 22 plasma, and 5 brain loci still had SNPs with independent and genome-wide significance.
“After the first round of conditional analyses, 55 CSF, 22 plasma, and 5 brain loci still had SNPs with independent and genome-wide significance (Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
rs2075803 (p.K100E) explained 81% of CSF Siglec-9.
“For example, rs2075803 (p.K100E) explained 81% of CSF Siglec-9, rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 74.4% of plasma sICAM-1, and rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 67.4% of brain PPAC (Extended Data Fig.10d, Tables S3, S4, S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
pQTLs are significantly enriched for coding variants.
“This indicates that pQTLs are significantly enriched for coding-variants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
96.8% of the 127 plasma pQTLs were replicated.
“We were able to replicate 96.8% of our 127 pQTLs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Multi-tissue meta-analysis identified 253 pQTLs compared to 139 in our CSF cohort alone.
“We found 253 pQTLs compared to the 139 that were found in our CSF cohort alone (Extended Data Fig.3c,d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
77% to 91% of trans-pQTLs were tissue specific.
“we found that 15 to 26% of cis-pQTLs were tissue specific (Fig. 4b) while 77 to 91% of trans-pQTLs were tissue specific (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
51 pQTLs (49 cis and 2 trans, 18.6%) identified in this study have genome-wide significance with effects in the same direction as one or both CSF replication studies.
“We found that 51 pQTLs (49 cis and 2 trans, 18.6%) identified in our study have genome-wide significance with effects in the same direction as one or both studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genetic variants in the SPCS3-VEGFC region regulated brain levels of 5 different proteins including Angiopoietin-1 and Growth hormone receptor.
“For example, genetic variants in the SPCS3-VEGFC region regulated brain levels of 5 different proteins including Angiopoietin-1 and Growth hormone receptor (Fig. 3g, Extended Data Fig.7, Table S14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
16 (5.8%) additional pQTLs have been reported as pQTLs in other tissues.
“We identified an additional 16 (5.8%) pQTLs that have been reported as pQTLs in other tissues (plasma studies from AddNeuroMed 20, INTERVAL10, KORA11, SCALLOP12, the Phenoscanner database21, a brain mass spectrometry-based pQTL study16, and in our plasma or brain pQTL data).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, the known pleiotropy of the ABO locus for 7 different proteins, including E-Selectin, was replicated.
“In plasma, we replicated the known pleiotropy of the ABO locus for 7 different proteins, including E-Selectin (Fig. 3f, Extended Data Fig.6, Table S13)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Few pQTLs are age-specific, indicated by high correlation (Pearson's r>0.98) between initial and age-stratified analyses.
“We found an extremely high correlation (Pearson’s r>0.98, Table S11), indicating that few pQTLs are age-specific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The associations of genetic variants with protein levels are not disease-specific, indicated by high correlation (Pearson's r>0.98) between initial and disease-status analyses.
“We found an extremely high correlation (Pearson’s r>0.98, Extended Data Fig.4, Tables S8, S9, S10) indicating that the associations of the genetic variants with protein levels are not disease-specific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IL6R had a strong cis-pQTL primarily associated with the coding variant rs2228145 p.D358A (and rs12730935 in perfect linkage disequilibrium), with plasma p=1.6×10−105 and CSF p=1.3×10−104.
“One example of such regulation by nonsynonymous variants is IL6R, which had a strong cis-pQTL that was primarily associated with the coding-variant rs2228145 p.D358A (and rs12730935 which was in perfect linkage disequilibrium; plasma=1.6×10−105 CSF= 1.3×10−104)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 74.4% of plasma sICAM-1.
“For example, rs2075803 (p.K100E) explained 81% of CSF Siglec-9, rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 74.4% of plasma sICAM-1, and rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 67.4% of brain PPAC (Extended Data Fig.10d, Tables S3, S4, S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
15% to 26% of cis-pQTLs were tissue specific.
“we found that 15 to 26% of cis-pQTLs were tissue specific (Fig. 4b) while 77 to 91% of trans-pQTLs were tissue specific (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For plasma, 17 of 127 independent pQTLs were novel.
“For plasma (Fig. 3b), we found 127 independent pQTLs, of which 17 were novel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both cis- and trans-pQTLs were strongly enriched for synonymous and non-synonymous exonic variants (odds ratio = 3.71, 5.25, 4.19 for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively).
“However, both cis- and trans-pQTLs were strongly enriched for synonymous and non-synonymous exonic variants (Odds Ratio = 3.71, 5.25, 4.19 for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively; Extended Data Fig.10c; Supplementary Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genetic variants in the APOE region were associated with 13 different CSF proteins, including apo E2 and 14-3-3.
“Genetic variants in the APOE gene region were associated with 13 different CSF proteins, including apo E2 and 14-3-3 (Fig. 3d,e, Extended Data Fig.5, Table S12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For brain, 27 of 32 independent pQTLs were novel.
“For brain (Fig. 3c), we found 32 independent pQTLs, of which 27 were novel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For CSF, 223 (81.3%) of 274 independent pQTLs were novel.
“For CSF (Fig. 3a), we found 274 independent pQTLs, of which 223 (81.3%) were novel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There are four independent variants for CSF ASAHL.
“Similarly, there are four independent variants for CSF ASAHL (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For CSF, there were 59 pleiotropic regions where a single locus was associated with 2 or more proteins.
“For CSF, we found 59 pleiotropic regions where a single locus was associated with 2 or more proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 14-3-3 protein was regulated by the APOE locus.
“our results indicated that 14-3-3 protein was also regulated by the APOE locus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More than 90.1% of CSF pQTLs were replicated.
“In summary, we were able to replicate more than 90.1% of the CSF pQTLs, which is higher than in previous studies10.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF and plasma each shared more than 70% of brain pQTLs.
“CSF and plasma each shared more than 70% of brain pQTLs, suggesting that CSF and plasma were informative tissues for studying brain-related disorders such as AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The strength of association for cis-signals decreased with distance from the transcription start site.
“We found that the strength of the association (negative log10 p-value) for cis-signals decreased with distance from the transcription start site (Extended Data Fig.10a), similar to what has been previously reported for cis-eQTLs7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was an inverse relationship between the absolute value of effect size (beta) and minor allele frequency.
“There was an inverse relationship between absolute value of the effect size (beta) and MAF (Extended Data Fig.10b), which is consistent with previous protein-level genome-wide association studies10,29.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mendelian randomization plus colocalization analyses indicated that E-Selectin is genetically associated with stroke.
“E-Selectin is a known stroke biomarker24, and our MR plus colocalization analyses indicated that this protein is genetically associated with the disease (Tables S27, S30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses indicated that IDUA is functional (FDR=9.37×10−6; PP.H4 = 0.998).
“The MR and colocalization analyses indicated that IDUA, encoded by IDUA, is functional (FDR=9.37×10−6; Table S27, PP.H4 = 0.998; Table S30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
1.03% to 10% of pQTLs colocalized with DNA-methylation QTLs.
“Between 1.03 to 10% of pQTLs colocalized with DNA-methylation QTLs, and fewer than 2% colocalized with histone-acetylation QTLs (Tables S23, S24).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CSF Carbonic Anhydrase IV for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk is supported by Mendelian randomization analysis (FDR = 7.61×10−6).
“The third example is CSF Carbonic Anhydrase IV for ALS risk, which is supported by MR analysis (FDR = 7.61×10−6; Table S27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fewer than 2% of pQTLs colocalized with histone-acetylation QTLs.
“Between 1.03 to 10% of pQTLs colocalized with DNA-methylation QTLs, and fewer than 2% colocalized with histone-acetylation QTLs (Tables S23, S24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified 25 drugs known to interact with proteins identified by Mendelian randomization as associated with Alzheimer disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or stroke.
“In this study, we identified 25 drugs (Table S31) that are known to interact with proteins that were identified by MR as being associated with AD, PD, ALS, or stroke.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
3.1% to 16.7% of pQTLs were splicing-QTLs.
“Our colocalization analyses indicated that just 3.1 to 16.7% of pQTLs were splicing-QTLs (Tables S21, S22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mendelian randomization analyses indicated that CD33 is implicated in Alzheimer disease.
“MR analyses indicated that CD33 is implicated in AD (Table S29).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Carvedilol was identified from the drug repositioning analysis.
“Carvedilol was identified from our drug repositioning analysis and has been reported to provide neuroprotection in animal models41.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 67.4% of brain PPAC.
“For example, rs2075803 (p.K100E) explained 81% of CSF Siglec-9, rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 74.4% of plasma sICAM-1, and rs5498 (p.K469E) explained 67.4% of brain PPAC (Extended Data Fig.10d, Tables S3, S4, S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain, 28% of pQTLs colocalized in GTEx.
“In brain, 28% of our pQTLs were colocalized in GTEx, which is within a similar scale to the Robins et al. (2019) study16 in which the authors used mass spectrometry-based proteomics to measure 7,901 proteins in 144 samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, 16% of pQTLs colocalized with eQTLs.
“In plasma, 16% of our pQTLs colocalized with eQTLs, similar to previous studies10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Between 48% (brain) and 76.6% (CSF) of pQTLs did not colocalize with QTLs for expression, splicing, DNA-methylation, or histone-acetylation.
“Overall, between 48 (brain) to 76.6% (CSF) of pQTLs identified in this study did not colocalize with QTLs for expression, splicing, DNA-methylation, or histone-acetylation, suggesting that protein level may help explain some missing heritability of disease when integrated with other molecular traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For plasma, the overall Pearson correlation coefficient between fasted and non-fasted samples is 0.907 (95% CI 0.904-0.911).
“The overall Pearson’s correlation coefficient between fasted and non-fasted samples is 0.907, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.904 to 0.911 (Extended Data Fig.2a,d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
By leveraging this data, we mapped some additional GWAS loci.
“By leveraging this data, we have been able to map some additional GWAS loci, identify additional causal proteins implicated in disease pathogenesis, identify novel biomarkers, and reposition drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We observed several associations between proteins and asthma risk.
“we observed several associations (Table 2, S33) between proteins and asthma risk, an example of non-neurological diseases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For CSF, the overall Pearson correlation coefficient between two LP dates is 0.995 (95% CI 0.99518-0.99526).
“The overall Pearson’s correlation coefficient between two LP dates was 0.995, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.99518 to 0.99526 (Extended Data Fig.2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For brain, the overall Pearson correlation coefficient between two technical replicates is 0.976 (95% CI 0.9762-0.9812).
“The overall Pearson’s correlation coefficient between these two replicates is 0.976, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.9762 to 0.9812 (Extended Data Fig.2a,f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We identified novel biomarkers.
“By leveraging this data, we have been able to map some additional GWAS loci, identify additional causal proteins implicated in disease pathogenesis, identify novel biomarkers, and reposition drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For plasma, the overall Pearson correlation coefficient between two biological replicates (1997 and 2007) is 0.938 (95% CI 0.9299-0.9453).
“The overall Pearson’s correlation coefficient between these two biological replicates is 0.938, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.9299 to 0.9453 (Extended Data Fig.2a,e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this study we generated a detailed map of multi-tissue pQTLs.
“In this study we generated a detailed map of multi-tissue pQTLs that will be crucial for understanding the tissue-specific genetic architecture of protein levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CSF, the Pearson correlation between longitudinal and baseline samples from 321 subjects was 0.995 (95% CI 0.995-0.995).
“Scatterplot of 321 subjects with both longitudinal and baseline samples from CSF indicates a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.995 (95% confidence interval from 0.995 to 0.995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and an AD case-only model was 0.989 (p = 1.8×10−83, 95% CI 0.983-0.992).
“Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.991 (p-value = 3.9×10−160, 95%CI =0.988 to 0.993), 0.989 (p-value = 1.8×10−83, 95%CI =0.983 to 0.992), 0.998 (p-value = 2.4×10−29, 95%CI =0.995 to 0.999) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, the Pearson correlation between fasted and nonfasted samples from 11 subjects was 0.907 (95% CI 0.904-0.911).
“Scatterplot of 11 subjects with both fasted and nonfasted samples from plasma indicates a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.907 (95% confidence interval from 0.904 to 0.911).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CSF, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and a joint model with disease status as a covariate was 0.999 (p < 2.2×10−16, 95% CI 0.999-0.999).
“Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.999 (p-value < 2.2×10−16, 95%CI = 0.999 to 0.999), 0.999 (p-value = 4.3×10−202, 95%CI =0.999 to 0.999), 0.999 (p-value = 9.5×10−52, 95%CI = 0.999 to 0.999) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and an AD case-only model was 0.998 (p = 2.4×10−29, 95% CI 0.995-0.999).
“Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.991 (p-value = 3.9×10−160, 95%CI =0.988 to 0.993), 0.989 (p-value = 1.8×10−83, 95%CI =0.983 to 0.992), 0.998 (p-value = 2.4×10−29, 95%CI =0.995 to 0.999) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
pQTL effect estimates were highly correlated between the default model and models including disease status or AD cases only across CSF, plasma, and brain.
“Using model 1 for comparison, we observed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.999, 0.999, 0.999 for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively. Using model 2 for comparison, we observed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.991, 0.989, 0.998 for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and a joint model with disease status as a covariate was 0.999 (p = 9.5×10−52, 95% CI 0.999-0.999).
“Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.999 (p-value < 2.2×10−16, 95%CI = 0.999 to 0.999), 0.999 (p-value = 4.3×10−202, 95%CI =0.999 to 0.999), 0.999 (p-value = 9.5×10−52, 95%CI = 0.999 to 0.999) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and a joint model with disease status as a covariate was 0.999 (p = 4.3×10−202, 95% CI 0.999-0.999).
“Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.999 (p-value < 2.2×10−16, 95%CI = 0.999 to 0.999), 0.999 (p-value = 4.3×10−202, 95%CI =0.999 to 0.999), 0.999 (p-value = 9.5×10−52, 95%CI = 0.999 to 0.999) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain, the Pearson correlation between two technical replicates from one subject was 0.976 (95% CI 0.976-0.981).
“Scatterplot of one subject with two technical replicates from brain indicates a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.976 (95% confidence interval from 0.976 to 0.981).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CSF, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and an AD case-only model was 0.991 (p = 3.9×10−160, 95% CI 0.988-0.993).
“Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.991 (p-value = 3.9×10−160, 95%CI =0.988 to 0.993), 0.989 (p-value = 1.8×10−83, 95%CI =0.983 to 0.992), 0.998 (p-value = 2.4×10−29, 95%CI =0.995 to 0.999) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, the Pearson correlation between longitudinal and baseline samples from one subject was 0.938 (95% CI 0.930-0.945).
“Scatterplot of one subject with both longitudinal and baseline samples from plasma indicates a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.938 (95% confidence interval from 0.930 to 0.945).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and a cognitively unimpaired (CO) only model was 0.602 (p = 0.002, 95% CI 0.262-0.809).
“Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.999 (p-value = 5.2×10−234, 95%CI =0.998 to 0.999), 0.998 (p-value = 1.17×10−122, 95%CI =0.997 to 0.999), 0.602 (p-value = 0.002, 95%CI =0.262 to 0.809) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and a cognitively unimpaired (CO) only model was 0.998 (p = 1.17×10−122, 95% CI 0.997-0.999).
“Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.999 (p-value = 5.2×10−234, 95%CI =0.998 to 0.999), 0.998 (p-value = 1.17×10−122, 95%CI =0.997 to 0.999), 0.602 (p-value = 0.002, 95%CI =0.262 to 0.809) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CSF, the Pearson correlation of pQTL effect sizes between the default model and a cognitively unimpaired (CO) only model was 0.999 (p = 5.2×10−234, 95% CI 0.998-0.999).
“Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.999 (p-value = 5.2×10−234, 95%CI =0.998 to 0.999), 0.998 (p-value = 1.17×10−122, 95%CI =0.997 to 0.999), 0.602 (p-value = 0.002, 95%CI =0.262 to 0.809) for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In plasma, 34 pleiotropic regions passed the genome-wide significance threshold (5×10−8) (sample size = 529).
“In total, 34 pleiotropic regions passing genome-wide significance threshold (5×10−8) in plasma (sample size = 529).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CSF, 59 pleiotropic regions passed the genome-wide significance threshold (5×10−8) (sample size = 835).
“In total, 59 Pleiotropic regions passing genome-wide significance threshold (5×10−8) in CSF (sample size = 835).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In brain, 10 pleiotropic regions passed the genome-wide significance threshold (5×10−8) (sample size = 380).
“In total, 10 pleiotropic regions passing genome-wide significance threshold (5×10−8) in brain (sample size = 380).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
CSF and plasma are informative tissues for studying brain-related disorders such as Alzheimer disease.
“CSF and plasma each shared more than 70% of brain pQTLs, suggesting that CSF and plasma were informative tissues for studying brain-related disorders such as AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Based on validation with plasma and brain pQTLs, the authors estimate that more than 90% of the 22 pending CSF pQTLs are real.
“However, based on our validation with plasma and brain pQTLs, we estimate that more than 90% of those pQTLs are real.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Protein levels are likely to be regulated post-transcriptionally rather than by regulating mRNA level.
“The enrichment of coding-variants for pQTLs in cis and trans (Extended Data Fig.10c, Tables S3, S4, S5) suggests that protein levels are likely to be regulated post-transcriptionally rather than by regulating mRNA level30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Suhre, K., McCarthy, M. I. & Schwenk, J. M. Genetics meets proteomics: perspectives for large population-based studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 19–37 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The IL6R variant leads to increased cleavage by ADAM10 and ADAM17 of membrane bound IL6R.
“as this variant leads to increased cleavage by ADAM10 and ADAM17 of membrane bound IL6R18.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Haddick, P. C. G. et al. A common variant of IL-6R is associated with elevated IL-6 pathway activity in Alzheimer’s disease brains. J. Alzheimers Dis. 56, 1037–1054 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
AVE9633 could be used in the context of Alzheimer disease.
“Our analyses also indicated that CD33 is a target of AVE9633, an anti-CD33 antibody used to treat acute myeloid leukemia, and therefore this antibody could be used in the context of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Acetazolamide was inferred as a potential drug to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk.
“We further inferred Acetazolamide as a potential drug to treat ALS risk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Protein level may help explain some missing heritability of disease when integrated with other molecular traits.
“Overall, between 48 (brain) to 76.6% (CSF) of pQTLs identified in this study did not colocalize with QTLs for expression, splicing, DNA-methylation, or histone-acetylation, suggesting that protein level may help explain some missing heritability of disease when integrated with other molecular traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An ongoing clinical trial has been using antibodies targeting CD33 as a potential therapy for Alzheimer disease.
“An ongoing clinical trial has been using antibodies targeting CD33 as a potential therapy for AD37.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Alector Inc. First in human study for safety and tolerability of AL003. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03822208 (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The investigation identified chondroitin sulfate as a drug that could play a role in the IDUA pathway.
“Our investigation identified chondroitin sulfate as a drug that could play a role in the IDUA pathway.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A recent in vitro study supported Acetazolamide as a potential treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
“Moreover, a recent in vitro study40 supported this drug as a potential treatment for ALS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Camerino, G. M. et al. Elucidating the contribution of skeletal muscle ion channels to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in search of new therapeutic options. Sci. Rep. 9, 3185 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CD33 is a microglia-specific gene.
“CD33 is a microglia-specific gene36 and likely affects microglia activity and innate immune response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Del-Aguila, J. L. et al. A single-nuclei RNA sequencing study of Mendelian and sporadic AD in the human brain. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 11, 71 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The IDUA locus is the third most significant locus in the largest GWAS studying Parkinson's disease risk.
“The IDUA locus is the third most significant locus in the largest GWAS38 studying PD risk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Nalls, M. A. et al. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol. 18, 1091–1102 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The observation of enrichment of coding variants in pQTLs could be largely biased by the platform.
“Our observation of an enrichment of coding-variants in pQTLs could be largely biased by the platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The aptamer-based technology was highly reproducible.
“The overall high correlations within each tissue indicated that the aptamer-based technology was highly reproducible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The study's data can be applied to other traits beyond Alzheimer disease or Parkinson's disease.
“This study goes beyond AD or PD, and the data generated here can be applied to other traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
We present a unique resource for leveraging multi-tissue pQTL to understand neurological traits.
“We present the largest brain and CSF pQTL analyses to date, the first neurologically-relevant multi-tissue pQTL study, and a unique resource for leveraging multi-tissue pQTL to understand neurological traits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The aptamer-binding platform used to profile proteomics might be confounded by recognition difference instead of real protein abundance change.
“An important note is that we used an aptamer-binding platform to profile proteomics, which might be confounded by recognition difference instead of real protein abundance change, as already addressed by Sun et al10.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Sun, B. B. et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Another reason for a potential lack of eQTL-pQTL colocalization in brain is because brain pQTLs are derived from parietal lobe cortex, and brain eQTLs from GTEx are from whole cortex.
“Another reason for a potential lack of eQTL-pQTL colocalization in brain is because our brain pQTLs are derived from parietal lobe cortex, and the brain eQTLs from GTEx are from whole cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Non-coding pQTLs may remain undetected due to a lack of statistical power.
“Therefore, non-coding pQTLs may remain undetected due to a lack of statistical power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
We identified additional causal proteins implicated in disease pathogenesis.
“By leveraging this data, we have been able to map some additional GWAS loci, identify additional causal proteins implicated in disease pathogenesis, identify novel biomarkers, and reposition drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
We present the largest brain and CSF pQTL analyses to date.
“We present the largest brain and CSF pQTL analyses to date, the first neurologically-relevant multi-tissue pQTL study, and a unique resource for leveraging multi-tissue pQTL to understand neurological traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our observation on associations between proteins and neurological diseases may not be disease-specific.
“our observation on associations between proteins and neurological diseases may not be disease-specific, as we observed several associations (Table 2, S33) between proteins and asthma risk, an example of non-neurological diseases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The data suggest that pQTLs are located in coding regions more often than are eQTLs.
“Our data suggest that pQTLs are located in coding regions more often than are eQTLs, and our results could be biased, because coding pQTLs have stronger effects than non-coding pQTLs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is clear that we cannot anticipate an eQTL-pQTL colocalization for a large proportion of coding genes.
“It is clear that we cannot anticipate an eQTL-pQTL colocalization for a large proportion of coding genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
We repositioned drugs.
“By leveraging this data, we have been able to map some additional GWAS loci, identify additional causal proteins implicated in disease pathogenesis, identify novel biomarkers, and reposition drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
We performed MR after removing all pleiotropic regions reported in this study within each tissue.
“confidence in our results may be bolstered by the fact that we performed MR after removing all pleotropic regions reported in this study within each tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
We present the first neurologically-relevant multi-tissue pQTL study.
“We present the largest brain and CSF pQTL analyses to date, the first neurologically-relevant multi-tissue pQTL study, and a unique resource for leveraging multi-tissue pQTL to understand neurological traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Proteomics was profiled from 1300 CSF, 648 plasma, and 459 samples.
“we profiled proteomics from 1300 CSF, 648 plasma and 459 samples (2nd column).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The relatively low correlation seen when using model 3 for comparison with controls only in brain samples was due to a much smaller sample size.
“The relatively low correlation seen when using model 3 for comparison with controls only in brain samples was due to a much smaller sample size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A total of 835 CSF, 529 plasma, and 380 brain samples passed filters on both genomic and proteomic QC.
“A total of 835 CSF, 529 plasma, and 380 brain samples passed filters on both genomic and proteomic QC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The original studies used unimputed genotype data.
“We decided to reprocess the pQTL analyses because the original studies used unimputed genotype data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The relatively low correlation in the default model comparison with control only in brain samples was due to the much smaller sample size as a control for brain samples.
“The relatively low correlation in default model comparison with control only in brain samples was due to much smaller sample size as a control for brain samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 30
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study found 1 protein with up to 5 independent signals, 10 proteins with 4 independent signals, and 30 proteins with 3 independent signals.
“We found 1 protein with up to 5 independent signals, 10 proteins with 4 independent signals, and 30 proteins with 3 independent signals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data96.8% of plasma pQTLs and 96.9% of brain pQTLs were replicated.
“This is supported by the fact that we have been able to replicate 96.8% and 96.9% of plasma and brain pQTLs (see below).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCSF meta-analysis including 596 common proteins identified 425 pQTLs for 310 proteins, compared to 250 pQTLs for 185 proteins in our CSF cohort alone.
“Due to the increased sample-size, we identified 425 pQTLs for 310 proteins, compared to 250 pQTLs for 185 proteins identified in our CSF cohort alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter conditioning on the main CSF ARTS1 signal, a genome-wide signal tagged by rs467735 remained and was associated with gene expression.
“After conditioning on this signal, there was still a genome-wide signal tagged by rs467735 (conditional p-value=9.82×10−89) that was associated with gene expression (GTEx; multi-tissue p-value=0).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor brain, 5 (15.6%) signals replicated at genome-wide significance, 8 (25%) at nominal association, and 18 (56.3%) showed at least nominal association in brain or CSF; only 1 (3.1%) was not replicated.
“We were able to replicate 5 (15.6%) signals at genome-wide significance, 8 (25%) signals at a nominal (p-value < 0.05) association, and 18 (56.3%) pQTLs that showed at least a nominal association in brain or CSF. Only 1 (3.1%) pQTL was not replicated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were an additional 32 pleiotropic regions in plasma and 9 in brain.
“We found an additional 32 pleiotropic regions in plasma and 9 in brain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn meta-analysis of the PPMI and Sasayama studies, 153 (55.8%) of our significant signals had genome-wide significance and 27 (9.9%) additional pQTLs showed at least nominal association in the same direction.
“We found that 153 (55.8%) of our significant signals had genome-wide significance in our meta-analysis of the PPMI19 and Sasayama studies and 27 (9.9%) additional pQTLs showed at least a nominal association (p-value < 0.05) in the same direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenCD33 is a target of AVE9633, an anti-CD33 antibody used to treat acute myeloid leukemia.
“Our analyses also indicated that CD33 is a target of AVE9633, an anti-CD33 antibody used to treat acute myeloid leukemia, and therefore this antibody could be used in the context of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMendelian randomization identified three proteins involved in Alzheimer disease risk in CSF, 13 in plasma, and 7 in brain.
“After multiple testing correction, we identified three proteins involved in AD risk in CSF, 13 in plasma, and 7 in brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly 13.3% to 33.3% of pQTLs had a posterior probability of hypothesis-4 (PP.H4)>0.8 for GTEx cortex eQTLs or 14.2% to 17.5% for GTEx whole blood eQTLs.
“Colocalization analyses indicated that only 13.3 to 33.3% of pQTLs had a posterior probability of hypothesis-4 (PP.H4)>0.8 for the GTEx cortex eQTLs or 14.2 to 17.5% for GTEx whole blood eQTLs (Tables S18, S19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data42.5% of protein-disease associations colocalized with GWAS loci, including plasma Siglec-3 (CD33) and Alzheimer disease risk.
“We found that 42.5% of protein-disease associations colocalized with GWAS loci, including plasma Siglec-3 (also known as CD33) and AD risk (Tables S29, S30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA SNP at the IDUA locus (rs35220088) is associated with plasma IDUA protein level and Parkinson's disease risk (p=2.47×10−6 and 3.52×10−9, respectively).
“We found a SNP at this locus that is associated with plasma IDUA protein level and PD risk (rs35220088; p= 2.47×10−6 and 3.52×10−9, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data83% to 90% of non-coding pQTLs and 10% to 17% of coding pQTLs were also seen in a mass spectrometry-based pQTL study.
“However, we found 83 to 90% of our non-coding pQTL and 10 to 17% coding pQTL, respectively and depending on tissues, were also seen in a mass spectrometry-based pQTL study16 (Table S32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe average time difference between the two CSF LP dates was 6.14 years (SD 2.98).
“The average time difference between the two LP dates was 6.14 years, and the standard deviation was 2.98 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe correlation between default model and controls-only model was lower in brain (0.602) than in CSF (0.999) and plasma (0.998).
“Using model 3 for comparison, we observed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.999, 0.998, 0.602 (p-value = 0.002) for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe estimates of variance explained by the top variant were similar to using the top variant as the only predictor after accounting for covariates.
“To account for variance explained by covariates, we also calculated the adjusted R-squared value using a nested model and the estimates were similar to using the top variant as the only predictor (Supplementary Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor CSF, the variance explained by conditionally independent variants had mean = 0.141, standard deviation = 0.144, and mode = 0.061.
“For CSF, the mean = 0.141, standard deviation = 0.144, mode = 0.061; For plasma, the mean = 0.157, standard deviation = 0.125, mode = 0.188; For brain, the mean = 0.208, standard deviation = 0.151, mode = 0.092.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor plasma, the variance explained by conditionally independent variants had mean = 0.157, standard deviation = 0.125, and mode = 0.188.
“For CSF, the mean = 0.141, standard deviation = 0.144, mode = 0.061; For plasma, the mean = 0.157, standard deviation = 0.125, mode = 0.188; For brain, the mean = 0.208, standard deviation = 0.151, mode = 0.092.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor brain, the variance explained by conditionally independent variants had mean = 0.208, standard deviation = 0.151, and mode = 0.092.
“For CSF, the mean = 0.141, standard deviation = 0.144, mode = 0.061; For plasma, the mean = 0.157, standard deviation = 0.125, mode = 0.188; For brain, the mean = 0.208, standard deviation = 0.151, mode = 0.092.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationE-Selectin is a known stroke biomarker.
“E-Selectin is a known stroke biomarker24, and our MR plus colocalization analyses indicated that this protein is genetically associated with the disease (Tables S27, S30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Ibanez, L. et al. Overlap in the genetic architecture of stroke risk, early neurological changes, and cardiovascular risk factors. Stroke 50, 1339–1345 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCSF Siglec-9, plasma sICAM-1, and brain PPAC have been replicated in other studies using a different proteomic approach, indicating these findings may not be driven by platform.
“CSF Siglec-9, plasma sICAM-1, and brain PPAC have been replicated in other studies16,29,31,32 using a different proteomic approach, which indicates that these findings may not be driven by platform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [16] Robins, C. et al. Genetic control of the human brain proteome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/816652 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Hillary, R. F. et al. Genome and epigenome wide studies of neurological protein biomarkers in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Nat. Commun. 10, 3160–3160 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Yao, C. et al. Genome‐wide mapping of plasma protein QTLs identifies putatively causal genes and pathways for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Commun. 9, 3268 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Paré, G. et al. Novel association of ABO histo-blood group antigen with soluble ICAM-1: results of a genome-wide association study of 6,578 women. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000118 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe analysis validated CD33 as a key protein to Alzheimer disease; it is also part of the TREM2-MS4A4A pathway.
“In summary, this analysis validated CD33 as a key protein to AD; it is also part of the TREM2-MS4A4A pathway.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAcetazolamide is known to inhibit carbonic anhydrases.
“Acetazolamide, used to treat glaucoma, epilepsy, and altitude sickness, is known to inhibit carbonic anhydrases39.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Bethea, J. W. Clinical Anesthesia, 6th Edition. Anesthesiology 112, 767–768 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCD33 likely affects microglia activity and innate immune response.
“CD33 is a microglia-specific gene36 and likely affects microglia activity and innate immune response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe data suggest that around half of pQTLs do not colocalize with other molecular QTLs, but this data cannot be extrapolated to all coding genes.
“Our data suggest that around half of pQTLs do not colocalize with other molecular QTLs, but this data cannot be extrapolated to all coding genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis is the first study to address the single-tissue bias when comparing pQTLs to results of multi-tissue eQTLs.
“This is the first study to address the single-tissue bias when comparing pQTLs to results of multi-tissue eQTLs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCompounds targeting proteins that are supported by genetic data are more likely to work than those without such support.
“It is known that compounds targeting proteins that are supported by genetic data are more likely to work than those without such support42.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Nelson, M. R. et al. The support of human genetic evidence for approved drug indications. Nat. Genet. 47, 856–860 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe percentages for coding variants were similar (Proportional-test: p-value > 0.05 in all three tissues), indicating that the enrichment of coding variants was not exclusively due to the bias of a single technology.
“The percentages for coding variants were similar (Proportional-test: p-value > 0.05 in all three tissues), indicating that this enrichment was not exclusively due to the bias of a single technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe sample size of this study is similar to or larger than GTEx for brain-relevant tissues, and eQTL studies from GTEx do not see the same amount of coding-variant enrichment.
“However, the sample size of our study is similar to or larger than GTEx for brain-relevant tissues, and eQTL studies from GTEx do not see the same amount of coding-variant enrichment5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Aguet, F. et al. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGene regulation may be region-specific, complicating overlap between QTL types.
“The gene regulation may be region-specific, and thus complicates the overlapping between two QTL types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe small proportion of overlap between eQTL and pQTL data can also be caused by measurements of mRNA expression and protein level in different cohorts, sample sizes, or other technical details.
“The small proportion of overlap between eQTL and pQTL data can also be caused by measurements of mRNA expression and protein level in different cohorts, sample sizes, or other technical details.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCarvedilol has been reported to provide neuroprotection in animal models.
“Carvedilol was identified from our drug repositioning analysis and has been reported to provide neuroprotection in animal models41.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Savitz, S. I. et al. The novel beta-blocker, carvedilol, provides neuroprotection in transient focal stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 20, 1197–1204 (2000). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor CSF, 965 out of 971 unique subjects have both genotype and proteomic data; for plasma, 633 out of 636; for brain, 450 out of 458.
“For CSF, 965 out of 971 unique subjects have both genotype and proteomic data. For plasma, 633 out of 636 unique subjects have both genotype and proteomic data. For brain tissue, 450 out of 458 unique subjects have both genotype and proteomic data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenData collection for the proteomics was randomized; all samples were randomly assigned to a profiling pool prior to proteomics measurement, considering age, sex, and disease status.
“Data collection for the proteomics was randomized. All samples were randomly assigned to a profiling pool prior to proteomics measurement, considering age, sex, and disease status.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAfter quality control, 931 plasma proteins were retained.
“After step-5, 931 proteins that shared by < 10 samples were kept.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe assay covers a dynamic range of 10^8 and measures all three major categories: secreted, membrane, and intracellular proteins.
“The assay covers a dynamic range of 108, and measures all three major categories: secreted, membrane, and intracellular proteins (Table S34, Supplementary Fig 2, 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Table S34
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Supplementary Fig 2, 3
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSample sizes for the AD case-only analysis were 217 for CSF, 168 for plasma, and 248 for brain.
“Sample size for this AD case (CA) only analysis was 217, 168, and 248 for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSample sizes for the joint analysis were 835 for CSF, 529 for plasma, and 380 for brain.
“Sample size for this joint analysis was 835, 529, and 380 for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe coverage of proteins on the platform has taken into account proteins known to be relevant to human disease, including neurodegenerative diseases and cardiovascular diseases.
“The coverage of proteins on the platform has taken into account proteins known to be relevant to human disease, including neurodegenerative diseases55 and cardiovascular diseases56; thus it has been widely used for biomarker discovery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [55] Sattlecker, M. et al. Alzheimer’s disease biomarker discovery using SOMAscan multiplexed protein technology. Alzheimers Dement. 10, 724–734 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Williams, S. A. et al. Plasma protein patterns as comprehensive indicators of health. Nat. Med. 25, 1851–1857 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationNo statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes within each tissue type, but the sample sizes are much larger or comparable to those in previous publications.
“No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes within each tissue type, but our sample sizes are much larger or comparable to those in previous publications13,14,16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [13] Deming, Y. et al. Genetic studies of plasma analytes identify novel potential biomarkers for several complex traits. Sci. Rep. 6, 18092 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Sasayama, D. et al. Genome-wide quantitative trait loci mapping of the human cerebrospinal fluid proteome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 44–51 (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Robins, C. et al. Genetic control of the human brain proteome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/816652 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDrugBank is a manually curated database that maintains profiles for >15,000 drugs, including FDA-approved and experimental drugs.
“This is a manually curated database that maintains profiles for >15,000 drugs (including FDA-approved and experimental drugs).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D668–D672 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAfter quality control, 1079 brain proteins were retained.
“After step-5, 1079 proteins that shared by < 21 samples were kept.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData collection for the genotype was not randomized or blocked.
“Data collection for the genotype was not randomized or blocked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAfter quality control, 713 CSF proteins were retained.
“After step-5, 713 proteins that shared by < 30 samples (shared by ~80% of the subject outliers) were kept.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSample sizes for the cognitively unimpaired (CO) only analysis were 614 for CSF, 357 for plasma, and 24 for brain.
“Sample size for this cognitive unimpaired (CO) only analysis was 614, 357, and 24 for CSF, plasma, and brain respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe pseudo-bulk derived cell-type specific eQTLs were underpowered compared with bulk-level pQTLs.
“We used different priors because the pseudo-bulk derived cell-type specific eQTLs were underpowered compared with bulk-level pQTLs with p1 as 1×10−4, p2 as 1×10−2, and p12 as 1×10−3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most GWAS identify multiple disease loci rather than functional variants or genes.
“Most GWAS identify multiple disease loci rather than functional variants or genes, which makes it difficult to biologically interpret association results and to identify novel biomarkers and drug targets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
eQTL mapping has not been able to fully identify the functional variants and genes driving GWAS signals.
“However, eQTL mapping has not been able to fully identify the functional variants and genes driving GWAS signals.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Data distribution was assumed to be normal, but this was not formally tested.
“For these tests, data distribution was assumed to be normal, but this was not formally tested.”
“For these tests, data distribution was assumed to be normal, but this was not formally tested.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Understanding the genetic architecture of protein levels is necessary to fully understand the genetic architecture of complex traits.
“If we want to fully understand the genetic architecture of complex traits, we need to understand the genetic architecture of protein levels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Until now, multi-tissue pQTL mapping has been constrained by the limited availability of large-scale proteomic analyses in multiple tissues.
“Until now, multi-tissue pQTL mapping has been constrained by the limited availability of large-scale proteomic analyses in multiple tissues.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plasma proteogenomics shares little overlap with the brain.
“Large studies have investigated genetic association of protein levels, but they have overwhelmingly focused on plasma11–15; previous work has shown that plasma proteogenomics shares little overlap with the brain10.”
From Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The Results section (‘Tissue-specificity investigation’; page not specified in our copy) says plasma shared more than 70% of brain pQTLs and describes plasma as informative for studying brain-related disorders. That is contrary to the claim of little overlap. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAnother recent CSF pQTL study also implicated CD33 for AD by MR analysis.
“We note that another recent CSF pQTL study also implicated CD33 for AD by MR analysis (Yang et al, 2021), while several other proteins were uniquely implicated in this study versus in Yang et al (2021).”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
The Results section (“Mendelian randomization and drug repositioning”; page unavailable) says MR implicated CD33 in AD, and the study did analyze CSF pQTLs. However, it identifies the CD33–AD result specifically as a plasma-protein finding, not a CSF CD33 finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTwo pQTLs were common in both studies but associated with different proteins: rs76904798 was trans-acting and associated with GPNMB in this study and GRN in Yang et al (2021); rs12126142 was trans-acting in this study (PSME1) but cis-acting in Yang et al (2021) (IL6R).
“We also identified two additional pQTLs that were common in both studies but associated with different proteins. One of these (rs76904798) was trans‐acting and was associated with GPNMB in our study and GRN in Yang et al (2021). The second pQTL (rs12126142) was trans‐acting in our study (PSME1) but cis‐acting in the Yang et al (2021) study (IL6R).”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFifteen pQTL-protein pairs were replicated between this study and Yang et al (2021) with significant effects and similar direction; 12 were cis-acting and 3 were trans-acting.
“Fifteen pQTL‐protein pairs were replicated (significant effects with similar direction of effect with respect to the risk allele) between the studies (see Fig EV4; Dataset EV7). Out of these 15, 12 pQTL‐protein pairs were cis‐acting and three were trans‐acting.”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredcis-pQTL effect sizes correlate with proximity to the protein coding gene.
“We also confirmed previous evidence10,13 that cis-pQTL effect sizes correlate with proximity to the protein coding gene (Fig. 2D; Supp. Fig. 3H).”
From Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The Results section on functional annotation reports that cis-pQTL association strength (−log10 P) decreased with distance from the transcription start site in all three tissues. Extended Data Fig. 10 likewise plots association significance against distance, but plots effect size (beta) against minor allele frequency instead. The copy therefore supports a proximity relationship for association significance, not specifically for effect size. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Evidence suggests that candidate proteins can be identified for many neurological traits, even with smaller sample sizes.
“Evidence suggests that candidate proteins can be identified for many neurological traits, even with smaller sample sizes10,13”
From Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The Results (Mendelian randomization and drug repositioning; page unavailable) report identifying proteins implicated in several neurological traits, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS and stroke. The paper does not establish the claim that candidate proteins can be identified even with smaller sample sizes; Results (Replication and meta-analyses; page unavailable) instead report substantially more pQTL signals after increasing sample size. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is limited pQTL information in nonplasma contexts, with no studies analyzing more than 1000 samples outside of plasma until recent CSF efforts.
“There is limited pQTL information in nonplasma contexts, with no studies analyzing more than 1000 samples outside of plasma until recent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) efforts (12, 13).”
From Low overlap of plasma and CSF protein quantitative trait loci affects protein discovery for neurological disease (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
The Results (Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs; page unavailable) report analyses of 835 CSF and 380 brain samples, while Results (Replication and meta-analyses; page unavailable) describe two earlier CSF datasets of 132 and 131 samples. This supports the point that nonplasma pQTL data were limited, but the paper does not establish the categorical claim that no study outside plasma analyzed more than 1,000 samples before recent CSF efforts. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOnly a few genetic studies of the CSF proteome have been performed to date on larger sets of proteins.
“only a few such studies have been performed to date on larger sets of proteins (Kunkle et al, 2019; Sasayama et al, 2019; Yang et al, 2021)”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
The overall genetic architecture of the CSF pQTLs was similar to findings reported for plasma pQTLs, gene expression QTLs, and a recent study on CSF pQTLs.
“The overall genetic architecture of the CSF pQTLs was similar to findings reported for plasma pQTLs (Sun et al, 2018), gene expression QTLs (Stranger et al, 2012), and a recent study on CSF pQTLs (Yang et al, 2021).”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
Yang et al (2021) described 226 CSF cis-pQTLs and 48 trans-pQTLs.
“Yang et al (2021) described 226 CSF cis‐pQTLs (at P < 5 × 10−8) and 48 trans‐pQTLs (at Bonferroni corrected P) compared to 158 CSF cis‐pQTLs (at P < 5 × 10−8) and 59 CSF trans‐pQTLs (at Bonferroni corrected P) in our study.”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
The causal association between CD33 (also known as Siglec-3) and AD was replicated between this study and Yang et al (2021).
“Among our gene‐level findings, the causal association between CD33 (also known as Siglec‐3) and AD was replicated between the studies.”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
Eight cis pQTL-protein pairs had a proxy match (up to 10 kb) with Yang et al (2021) pQTL-protein pairs.
“Further, we identified 8 cis pQTL‐protein pairs with a proxy match (up to 10 kb) with Yang et al (2021) pQTL‐protein pairs (with the same protein and same directionality in the two studies).”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al, 2021
Plasma and CSF shared pQTLs in several loci.
“Plasma and CSF shared pQTLs in several loci, as reported previously. 10 , 28”
From A genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Previous studies found overlapping and tissue-specific pQTLs between plasma and CSF.
“Previous studies found overlapping and tissue‐specific pQTLs between plasma and CSF, 10 , 28 which was also found in this study.”
From A genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
The overlap between expression (mRNA) QTL and protein QTL is low.
“Because of this weak correlation, the overlap between expression (mRNA) quantitative trait loci (QTL) and protein QTL is also low10.”
From Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Trans associations were more likely to be CSF-specific than cis (655/862 trans vs 577/959 cis, P=4.19×10−13).
“Trans associations were more likely to be CSF-specific than cis (655/862 trans vs 577/959 cis, P=4.19×10−13), consistent with previous work10.”
From Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
This dataset represents an expansion of previous CSF pQTL work in both sample size (n=3,506) and number of proteins (n=6,361).
“This dataset represents an expansion of previous CSF pQTL work10,16–19 in both sample size (n=3,506) and number of proteins (n=6,361).”
From Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The SomaLogic aptamer-based platform can reliably quantify over 7,000 proteins in a variety of biofluids and cellular extracts.
“Although the SomaLogic aptamer-based platform is especially powerful and can reliably quantify over 7,000 proteins in a variety of biofluids and cellular extracts103–106, it is not yet possible to reliably quantify the entire proteome.”
From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
PPMI replication sample count differs
MinorThe results give 131 PPMI samples, whereas the methods say 132 PPMI CSF samples passed both genomic and proteomic QC.
“the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative19 (n=131; released December 2019, PPMI19 hereafter) also had proteomics and genotype data available.”
“A total of over 7 million (7,392,620) whole-genome sequenced SNPs and 132 CSF samples from study by PPMI19 passed filters on both genomics and proteomics QC.”
Conflicting relatedness thresholds
MinorThe genomic QC methods say one sample was removed from a pair at PI_HAT ≥ 0.5. The Extended Data Fig. 1 legend instead says retained donors had PI_HAT < 0.05, a tenfold stricter threshold.
“When duplicate samples or a pair of samples with cryptic relatedness (PI_HAT ≥ 0.5) were identified, we removed one sample from the pair.”
“Moreover, we kept donors that were not close with each other (PI_HAT < 0.05) after checking identity by descent (6th column).”
Disease-stratified brain correlation contradicts the reported minimum
MinorThe results state that all disease-stratified effect-size correlations exceeded 0.98, but the methods report a correlation of 0.602 for the brain control-only analysis. The lower value qualifies the conclusion that the associations are not disease-specific.
“We found an extremely high correlation (Pearson’s r>0.98, Extended Data Fig.4, Tables S8, S9, S10) indicating that the associations of the genetic variants with protein levels are not disease-specific.”
“Using model 3 for comparison, we observed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.999, 0.998, 0.602 (p-value = 0.002) for CSF, plasma, and brain, respectively.”
Cites
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447 · see citing works
ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data
Wang, K., Li, M., & Hakonarson, H. H. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq603 · Cited by 14,380 · see citing works
Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets
Chang, C. C., Chow, C. C., Tellier, L. C., Vattikuti, S., Purcell, S. M., & Lee, J. J. (2015) · Gigascience · doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 · Cited by 12,709 · see citing works
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Soni, N., Ross, A., Nookaew, I., Scheers, N., Gabrielsson, B., & Sandberg, A.-S. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms · Cited by 10,136 · see citing works
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882 · see citing works
Self-citationThe MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome
Hemani, G., Zheng, J., Elsworth, B., Wade, K. H., Haberland, V., Baird, D., Laurin, C., Burgess, S., Bowden, J., Langdon, R., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.34408 · Cited by 7,959 · see citing works
UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge
The UniProt Consortium (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1049 · Cited by 7,698 · see citing works
The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues
The GTEx Consortium, Aguet, F., Anand, S., Ardlie, K. G., Gabriel, S., Getz, G. A., Graubert, A., Hadley, K., Handsaker, R. E., Huang, K. H., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz1776 · Cited by 5,547 · see citing works
METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans
Willer, C. J., Li, Y., & Abecasis, G. R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq340 · Cited by 5,205 · see citing works
Mirra, S. S., Heyman, A., McKeel, D., Sumi, S. M., Crain, B. J., Brownlee, L. M., Vogel, F. S., Hughes, J. P., Belle, G. V., Berg, L., et al. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.4.479 · Cited by 4,961 · see citing works
circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R
Gu, Z., Gu, L., Eils, R., Schlesner, M., & Brors, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393 · Cited by 4,290 · see citing works
Giambartolomei, C., Vukcevic, D., Schadt, E. E., Franke, L., Hingorani, A. D., Wallace, C., & Plagnol, V. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004383 · Cited by 4,261 · see citing works
Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues
GTEx Consortium (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24277 · Cited by 4,036 · see citing works
Howie, B. N., Donnelly, P., & Marchini, J. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000529 · Cited by 3,928 · see citing works
DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration
Wishart, D. S. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj067 · Cited by 3,892 · see citing works
Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor
Huber, W. K., Carey, V. J., Gentleman, R. C., Anders, S., Carlson, M. R. J., Carvalho, B. S., Bravo, H. C., Davis, S. R., Gatto, L., Girke, T., et al. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3252 · Cited by 3,499 · see citing works
Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), Kunkle, B. W., The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (EADI), Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium (CHARGE), Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, P. A. E. R. F. A. D. C. (., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2 · Cited by 2,946 · see citing works
Self-citationAnnotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB
Boyle, A. P., Hong, E. L., Hariharan, M., Cheng, Y., Schaub, M. A., Kasowski, M., Karczewski, K. J., Park, J., Hitz, B. C., Weng, S., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.137323.112 · Cited by 2,722 · see citing works
LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results
Pruim, R. J., Welch, R. P., Sanna, S., Teslovich, T. M., Chines, P. S., Gliedt, T. P., Boehnke, M., Abecasis, G. R., & Willer, C. J. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq419 · Cited by 2,707 · see citing works
Unraveling the polygenic architecture of complex traits using blood eQTL metaanalysis
Võsa, U., Claringbould, A., Westra, H.-J., Bonder, M. J., Deelen, P., Zeng, B., Kirsten, H., Saha, A., Kreuzhuber, R., Kasela, S., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1101/447367 · Cited by 2,607 · see citing works
Võsa, U., Claringbould, A., Westra, H.-J., Bonder, M. J., Deelen, P., Zeng, B., Kirsten, H., Saha, A., Kreuzhuber, R., Yazar, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00913-z · Cited by 2,607 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease
Mathys, H., Davila-Velderrain, J., Peng, Z., Gao, F., Mohammadi, S., Young, J. Z., Menon, M., He, L., Abdurrob, F., Jiang, X., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1195-2 · Cited by 2,568 · see citing works
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
Khachaturian, Z. S. (1985) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060100083029 · Cited by 2,499 · see citing works
Nalls, M. A., Blauwendraat, C., Vallerga, C. L., Heilbron, K., Bandres-Ciga, S., Chang, D., Tan, M., Kia, D. A., Noyce, A. J., Xue, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30320-5 · Cited by 2,454 · see citing works
Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome
Sun, B. B., Maranville, J. C., Peters, J. E., Stacey, D., Staley, J. R., Blackshaw, J., Burgess, S., Jiang, T., Paige, E., Surendran, P., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0175-2 · Cited by 2,268 · see citing works
Self-citationPhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype–phenotype associations
Kamat, M., Blackshaw, J., Young, R., Surendran, P., Burgess, S., Danesh, J., Butterworth, A. S., & Staley, J. R. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz469 · Cited by 2,159 · see citing works
the DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium, Morris, A. P., Voight, B. F., Teslovich, T. M., Ferreira, T., Segrè, A. V., Steinthorsdottir, V., Strawbridge, R. J., Khan, H., Grallert, H., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2383 · Cited by 1,912 · see citing works
International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC), Nalls, M. A., Parkinson's Study Group (PSG) Parkinson's Research: The Organized GENetics Initiative (PROGENI), 23andMe, GenePD, NeuroGenetics Research Consortium (NGRC), Hussman Institute of Human Genomics (HIHG), Investigator, T. A. J. D., (CHARGE), C. F. H. A. A. R. I. G. E., North American Brain Expression Consortium (NABEC), et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3043 · Cited by 1,895 · see citing works
The Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI)
MAREK, K. L., Jennings, D. L., Lasch, S., Siderowf, A. D., Tanner, C. M., Simuni, T., Coffey, C. S., Kieburtz, K. D., Flagg, E., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.09.005 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Aptamer-Based Multiplexed Proteomic Technology for Biomarker Discovery
Gold, L., Ayers, D., Bertino, J., Bock, C., Bock, A., Brody, E. N., Carter, J., Dalby, A. B., Eaton, B. E., Fitzwater, T., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015004 · Cited by 1,754 · see citing works
The support of human genetic evidence for approved drug indications
Nelson, M. R., Tipney, H., Painter, J. L., Shen, J., Nicoletti, P., Shen, Y., Floratos, A., Sham, P. C., Li, M. J., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3314 · Cited by 1,666 · see citing works
Malik, R., Chauhan, G., Traylor, M., Sargurupremraj, M., Okada, Y., Mishra, A., Rutten‐Jacobs, L. C. A., Giese, A., van der Laan, S. W., Grétarsdóttir, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0058-3 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic Mapping in Human Disease
Altshuler, D., Daly, M. J., & Lander, E. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156409 · Cited by 1,452 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 17 new Parkinson's disease risk loci
Chang, D., Nalls, M. A., Hallgrímsdóttir, I. B., Hunkapiller, J., van der Brug, M., Cai, F., International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium, 23andMe Research Team, Kerchner, G. A., Ayalon, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3955 · Cited by 1,112 · see citing works
Heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate internalization and propagation of specific proteopathic seeds
Holmes, B. B., DeVos, S. L., Kfoury, N., Li, M., Jacks, R., Yanamandra, K., Ouidja, M. O., Brodsky, F. M., Marasa, J., Bagchi, D. P., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1301440110 · Cited by 859 · see citing works
Connecting genetic risk to disease end points through the human blood plasma proteome
Suhre, K., Arnold, M., Bhagwat, A. M., Cotton, R. J., Engelke, R., Raffler, J., Sarwath, H., Thareja, G., Wahl, A., DeLisle, R. K., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14357 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
A brief history of human disease genetics
Claussnitzer, M., Cho, J. H., Collins, R., Cox, N. J., Dermitzakis, E. T., Hurles, M. E., Kathiresan, S., Kenny, E. E., Lindgren, C. M., MacArthur, D. G., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1879-7 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
PARALS Registry, van Rheenen, W., SLALOM Group, SLAP Registry, NNIPPS Study Group, Shatunov, A., Dekker, A. M., McLaughlin, R. L., Diekstra, F. P., Pulit, S. L., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3622 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Fast and efficient QTL mapper for thousands of molecular phenotypes
Ongen, H., Buil, A., Brown, A. A., Dermitzakis, E. T., & Delaneau, O. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv722 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Démenais, F., Margaritte‐Jeannin, P., Barnes, K. C., Cookson, W., Altmüller, J., Ang, W., Barr, R. G., Beaty, T. H., Becker, A. B., Beilby, J. P., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-017-0014-7 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Cell type–specific genetic regulation of gene expression across human tissues
Kim-Hellmuth, S., Aguet, F., Oliva, M., Muñoz-Aguirre, M., Kasela, S., Wucher, V., Castel, S. E., Hamel, A. R., Viñuela, A., Roberts, A. L., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz8528 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Plasma protein patterns as comprehensive indicators of health
Williams, S. A., Kivimaki, M., Langenberg, C., Hingorani, A. D., Casas, J. P., Bouchard, C., Jonasson, C., Sarzynski, M. A., Shipley, M. J., Alexander, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0665-2 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Genetics meets proteomics: perspectives for large population-based studies
Suhre, K., McCarthy, M. I., & Schwenk, J. M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0268-2 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
An xQTL map integrates the genetic architecture of the human brain's transcriptome and epigenome
Ng, B., White, C. C., Klein, H.-U., Sieberts, S. K., McCabe, C., Patrick, E., Xu, J., Yu, L., Gaiteri, C., Bennett, D. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4632 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Yao, C., Chen, G., Song, C., Keefe, J., Mendelson, M., Huan, T., Sun, B. B., Laser, A., Maranville, J. C., Wu, H., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05512-x · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Urbut, S., Wang, G. T., Carbonetto, P. S., & Stephens, M. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0268-8 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease
The International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project, Huang, K.-L., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Marcora, E., Pimenova, A. A., Di Narzo, A. F., Kapoor, M., Jin, S. C., Harari, O., Bertelsen, S., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4587 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Self-citationFrontotemporal dementia and its subtypes: a genome-wide association study
Ferrari, R., Hernandez, D. G., Nalls, M. A., Rohrer, J. D., Ramasamy, A., Kwok, J. B. J., Dobson-Stone, C., Brooks, W. S., Schofield, P. R., Halliday, G. M., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70065-1 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Self-citationThe GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissuesPreprint
Aguet, F., Barbeira, A., Bonazzola, R., Brown, A. A., Castel, S. E., Jo, B., Kasela, S., Kim-Hellmuth, S., Liang, Y., Oliva, M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/787903 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
TREM2 Acts Downstream of CD33 in Modulating Microglial Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease
Griciuc, A., Patel, S., Federico, A. N., Choi, S. H., Innes, B. J., Oram, M. K., Cereghetti, G., McGinty, D., Anselmo, A., Sadreyev, R. I., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.06.010 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Genome-wide pleiotropy between Parkinson disease and autoimmune diseases
Witoelar, A., Jansen, I. E., Wang, Y., Desikan, R. S., Gibbs, J. R., Blauwendraat, C., Thompson, W. K., Hernandez, D. G., Djurovic, S., Schork, A. J., et al. (2017) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0469 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Mapping of 79 loci for 83 plasma protein biomarkers in cardiovascular disease
Folkersen, L., Fauman, E., Sabater-Lleal, M., Strawbridge, R. J., Frånberg, M., Sennblad, B., Baldassarre, D., Veglia, F., Humphries, S. E., Rauramaa, R., et al. (2017) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006706 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Paré, G., Chasman, D. I., Kellogg, M., Zee, R. Y. L., Rifai, N., Badola, S., Miletich, J. P., & Ridker, P. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000118 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
The <i>MS4A</i> gene cluster is a key modulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer’s disease risk
Deming, Y., Filipello, F., Cignarella, F., Cantoni, C., Hsu, S., Mikesell, R., Li, Z., Del-Aguila, J. L., Dube, U., Farias, F. G., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aau2291 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citationMancuso, N., Shi, H., Goddard, P. C., Kichaev, G., Gusev, A., & Paşaniuc, B. (2017) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.031 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Genetic Control of Expression and Splicing in Developing Human Brain Informs Disease Mechanisms
Walker, R. L., Ramaswami, G., Hartl, C., Mancuso, N., Gandal, M. J., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Paşaniuc, B., Stein, J. L., & Geschwind, D. H. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.021 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Exploring and visualizing large-scale genetic associations by using PheWeb
Taliun, S. A. G., VandeHaar, P., Boughton, A. P., Welch, R., Taliun, D., Schmidt, E. M., Zhou, W., Nielsen, J. B., Willer, C. J., Lee, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0622-5 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Alzheimer's disease biomarker discovery using SOMAscan multiplexed protein technology
Sattlecker, M., Kiddle, S. J., Newhouse, S., Proitsi, P., Nelson, S., Williams, S., Johnston, C., Killick, R., Simmons, A., Westman, E., et al. (2014) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.09.016 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
The single-cell eQTLGen consortium
van der Wijst, M. G. P., de Vries, D., Groot, H. E., Trynka, G., Hon, C.-C., Bonder, M. J., Stegle, O., Nawijn, M. C., Idaghdour, Y., van der Harst, P., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52155 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Iotchkova, V., Ritchie, G. R. S., Geihs, M., Morganella, S., Min, J. L., Walter, K., Timpson, N. J., Dunham, I., Birney, E., & Soranzo, N. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0322-6 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Orozco, L. D., Chen, H.-H., Cox, C., Katschke, K. J., Arceo, R., Espiritu, C., Caplazi, P., Nghiem, S. S., Chen, Y., Modrusan, Z. D., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.082 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
AddNeuroMed—The European Collaboration for the Discovery of Novel Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease
Lovestone, S., Francis, P. T., Kłoszewska, I., Mecocci, P., Simmons, A., Soininen, H. S., Spenger, C., Tsolaki, M., Vellas, B. J., Wahlund, L., et al. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05064.x · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Cerebrospinal fluid APOE levels: an endophenotype for genetic studies for Alzheimer's disease
Cruchaga, C., Kauwe, J. S. K., Nowotny, P., Bales, K., Pickering, E. H., Mayo, K., Bertelsen, S., Hinrichs, A., Fagan, A. M., Holtzman, D. M., et al. (2012) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/dds296 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationGiese, A., Adams, H. H. H., Chen, W.-M., Bakker, P. I. W. D., Hsu, F., Lee, J.-M., Lin, W.-Y., O'Donnell, M. J., Salomaa, V. V., Sapkota, B. R., et al. (2018) · ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) · doi:10.13025/27851 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
A single-nuclei RNA sequencing study of Mendelian and sporadic AD in the human brain
Del-Aguila, J. L., Li, Z., Dube, U., Mihindukulasuriya, K. A., Budde, J. P., Fernandez, M. V., Ibanez, L., Bradley, J., Wang, F., Bergmann, K., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0524-x · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citation14-3-3 proteins in neurological disorders.
Foote, M. M., & Zhou, Y. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Hook, P. W., McClymont, S. A., Cannon, G. H., Law, W. D., Morton, A. J., Goff, L. A., & McCallion, A. S. (2018) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.02.001 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The Novel β-Blocker, Carvedilol, Provides Neuroprotection in Transient Focal Stroke
Savitz, S. I., Erhardt, J. A., Anthony, J. V., Gupta, G., Li, X., Barone, F. C., & Rosenbaum, D. M. (2000) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200008000-00005 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Brain and Bannister's Clinical Neurology, 7th Ed.
Cole, M. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.1_part_1.241-a · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Kauwe, J. S. K., Bailey, M. H., Ridge, P. G., Perry, R., Wadsworth, M. E., Hoyt, K. L., Staley, L. A., Karch, C. M., Harari, O., Cruchaga, C., et al. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004758 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistical Testing of Shared Genetic Control for Potentially Related Traits
Wallace, C. (2013) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21765 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Genetic control of the human brain proteome
Robins, C., Wingo, A. P., Fan, W., Duong, D. M., Meigs, J., Gerasimov, E. S., Dammer, E. B., Cutler, D. J., Jager, P. L. D., Bennett, D. A., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/816652 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Multi-tissue transcriptome analyses identify genetic mechanisms underlying neuropsychiatric traits
Gamazon, E. R., Zwinderman, A. H., Cox, N. J., Denys, D. A. J. P., & Derks, E. M. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0409-8 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Identification of cis-regulatory variation influencing protein abundance levels in human plasma
Lourdusamy, A., Newhouse, S., Lunnon, K., Proitsi, P., Powell, J. F., Hodges, A., Nelson, S. K., Stewart, A., Williams, S. A., Kłoszewska, I., et al. (2012) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/dds186 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Hillary, R. F., McCartney, D. L., Harris, S. E., Stevenson, A. J., Seeboth, A., Zhang, Q., Liewald, D. C., Evans, K. L., Ritchie, C. W., Tucker-Drob, E. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11177-x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Kibinge, N., Relton, C. L., Gaunt, T. R., & Richardson, T. G. (2020) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.007 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Neurotensin reduces the affinity of D‐2 dopamine receptors in rat striatal membranes
von Euler, G., & Fuxé, K. (1987) · Acta Physiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1987.tb08285.x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues
Haugen, E., He, Y., Chen, L., Dermitzakis, E. T., Branton, P. A., Nobel, A. B., Park, Y., McLean, J. A., Neri, F. J., Tabor, D. E., et al. (2020) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/p82n-gb73 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Assessment of the Genetic Architecture of Alzheimer’s Disease Risk in Rate of Memory Decline
Del-Aguila, J. L., Fernández, M. V., Schindler, S., Ibanez, L., Deming, Y., Ma, S., Saef, B., Black, K., Budde, J., Norton, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-170834 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationHaddick, P. C. G., Alzheimer’s Disease Genetic Consortium (ADGC), A. D. N. I. (., Larson, J. L., Rathore, N., Bhangale, T. R., Phung, Q. T., Srinivasan, K., Hansen, D. V., Lill, J. R., Pericak-Vance, M. A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160524 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, H. J., & Kikuchi, G. (1972) · The Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a129847 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Genome-wide quantitative trait loci mapping of the human cerebrospinal fluid proteome
Sasayama, D., Hattori, K., Ogawa, S., Yokota, Y., Matsumura, R., Teraishi, T., Hori, H., Ota, M., Yoshida, S., & Kunugi, H. (2016) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddw366 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Brain xQTL map: Integrating the genetic architecture of the human brain transcriptome and epigenomePreprint
Ng, B., White, C. C., Klein, H., Sieberts, S., Aubin, C., Patrick, E., Xu, J., Yu, L., Gaiteri, C., Bennett, D. A. A., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/142927 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Rapidly progressive Alzheimer's disease and elevated 14-3-3 proteins in cerebrospinal fluid
Jayaratnam, S., Khoo, A., & Basic, D. (2008) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afn094 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Camerino, G. M., Fonzino, A., Conte, E., De Bellis, M., Mele, A., Liantonio, A., Tricarico, D., Tarantino, N., Dobrowolny, G., Musarò, A., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39676-3 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Genetic studies of plasma analytes identify novel potential biomarkers for several complex traits
Deming, Y., Xia, J., Cai, Y., Lord, J., Del-Aguila, J. L., Fernandez, M. V., Carrell, D., Black, K., Budde, J., Ma, S., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep18092 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationNdungu, A., Payne, A., Torres, J., van de Bunt, M., & McCarthy, M. I. (2020) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.01.003 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ibanez, L., Heitsch, L., Dube, U., Farias, F. H. G., Budde, J., Bergmann, K., Davenport, R., Bradley, J., Carrera, C., Kinnunen, J., et al. (2019) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.118.023097 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical Anesthesia, 6th Edition.
Bethea, J. W. (2010) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181ce9ea5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Watson, A. D. J. (1983) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1983.tb136063.x · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Richard, E., & Shepard, A. C. (1981) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/00000446-198104000-00033 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Effects of gene therapy on cardiovascular symptoms of lysosomal storage diseases
Poletto, É., Pasqualim, G., Giugliani, R., Matte, Ú. D. S., & Baldo, G. (2019) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2018-0100 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
[Indications for pacemaker therapy and its complications manifested by acute myocardial necrosis].
Solti, F., Szabó, Z., Rényi-Vámos, F., et al. (1973) · PubMed · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring biological age using omics data
Rutledge, J., Oh, H., & Wyss-Coray, T. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00511-7 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Emerging diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer disease
Self, W. K., & Holtzman, D. M. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02505-2 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Potential drug targets for multiple sclerosis identified through Mendelian randomization analysis
Lin, J., Zhou, J., & Xu, Y. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad070 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Advances in the development of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease
Klyucherev, T. O., Olszewski, P., Shalimova, A. A., Chubarev, V. N., Tarasov, V. V., Attwood, M. M., Syvänen, S., & Schiöth, H. B. (2022) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s40035-022-00296-z · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Walker, K. A., Chen, J., Shi, L., Yang, Y., Fornage, M., Zhou, L., Schlosser, P., Surapaneni, A., Grams, M. E., Duggan, M. R., et al. (2023) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adf5681 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Western, D., Timsina, J., Wang, L., Wang, C., Yang, C., Phillips, B., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Ali, M., Beric, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01972-8 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationSung, Y. J., Yang, C., Norton, J., Johnson, M., Fagan, A., Bateman, R. J., Perrin, R. J., Morris, J. C., Farlow, M. R., Chhatwal, J. P., et al. (2023) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abq5923 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain high-throughput multi-omics data reveal molecular heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease
Eteleeb, A. M., Novotny, B. C., Tarraga, C. S., Sohn, C., Dhungel, E., Brase, L., Nallapu, A., Buss, J., Farias, F., Bergmann, K., et al. (2024) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002607 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationAli, M., Timsina, J., Western, D., Liu, M., Beric, A., Budde, J., Do, A., Heo, G., Wang, L., Gentsch, J., et al. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.02.014 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationThe genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid
Hansson, O., Kumar, A., Janelidze, S., Stomrud, E., Insel, P. S., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Fauman, E., Hedman, Å. K., Nagle, M. W., et al. (2023) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.202216359 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence for dementia genetics and omics
Bettencourt, C., Skene, N., Bandres‐Ciga, S., Anderson, E., Winchester, L. M., Foote, I. F., Schwartzentruber, J., Botia, J. A., Nalls, M., Singleton, A., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13427 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Proteomic clusters underlie heterogeneity in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease progression
Wisch, J. K., Butt, O. H., Gordon, B. A., Schindler, S. E., Fagan, A. M., Henson, R. L., Yang, C., Boerwinkle, A. H., Benzinger, T. L. S., Holtzman, D. M., et al. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac484 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationA genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues
Marsh, T. W., Western, D., Timsina, J., Gorijala, P., Yang, C., Pastor, P., Liu, M., Morris, J. C., Bateman, R. J., Schindler, S. E., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14139 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationWestern, D., Yang, C., Timsina, J., Liu, M., Wang, C., Campbell, M. C., Kotzbauer, P., Perlmutter, J. S., Schindler, S. E., Morris, J. C., et al. (2026) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adz2016 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Yang, C., Farias, F. H. G., Ibanez, L., Suhy, A., Sadler, B., Fernandez, M. V., Wang, F., Bradley, J. L., Eiffert, B., Bahena, J. A., Budde, J. P., Li, Z., Dube, U., Sung, Y. J., Mihindukulasuriya, K. A., Morris, J. C., Fagan, A. M., Perrin, R. J., Benitez, B. A., Rhinn, H., Harari, O., & Cruchaga, C.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cruchaga, Carlos
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2021-07-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1302-1312
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC8521603
- OpenAlex
- W3181408683
- Semantic Scholar
- 0d589c7cbb4d5c3ebc31faec1517408030723fe2
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 25.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (R01AG044546, RF1AG053303)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- protein quantitative trait loci, proteome, brain, cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, neurological disorders, post-transcriptional regulation, tissue-specific gene regulation, Mendelian randomization, druggable targets
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Plasma, Proteome, Quantitative Trait Loci, Proteomics, High-Throughput Screening Assays
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review