Cited by 20Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNuclear Receptors and SignalingNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

LRRK2(I2020T) functional genetic interactors that modify eye degeneration and dopaminergic cell loss in Drosophila

Open access
Marcogliese, Paul C., Abuaish, Sameera, Kabbach, Ghassan, Abdel-Messih, Elizabeth, Seang, Sarah, Li, Gang, Slack, Ruth S., Haque, M. Emdadul +2 more·2017·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta is the primary cause for motor symptoms observed in Parkinson's disease (PD). Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are the most commonly linked contributor to familial PD. LRRK2 is suggested to be involved in a wide variety of cellular processes, but deciphering its role in the pathogenesis of PD has been difficult. Modelling PD in rodents has been a persistent challenge for the field. However, the fruit fly has been exploited to recapitulate PD gene related dopaminergic cell loss. Using the GAL4-UAS system and established models of hLRRK2 induced eye degeneration in Drosophila, we conducted an unbiased suppressor/enhancer screen to uncover genetic modifiers of LRRK2. We have identified 36 candidate interactors that modify LRRK2 induced toxicity in the Drosophila eye. Importantly, we determined that a subset of these interactors also modified hLRRK2(I2020T) induced dopaminergic neuronal loss in the fly brain and uncovered 16 candidates that modify dopaminergic cell loss. Our results suggest LRRK2 may be involved in a wide variety of cellular processes and the results from this screen provide an important genetic resource for further evaluation of LRRK2 function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddx030

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using an hLRRK2-induced eye degeneration model in Drosophila, genetic modifiers of LRRK2 were screened, and Scar/WAVE was found to be a genetic interactor of LRRK2.

    “Using an hLRRK2-induced eye degeneration model in Drosophila, genetic modifiers of LRRK2 were screened, and Scar/WAVE was found to be a genetic interactor of LRRK2168.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Correia Guedes, L., Ferreira, J.J., Rosa, M.M., Coelho, M., Bonifati, V. and Sampaio, C. (2010) Worldwide frequency of G2019S LRRK2 mutation in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord., 16, 237-242.
  2. Liu, Z., Wang, X., Yu, Y., Li, X., Wang, T., Jiang, H., Ren, Q., Jiao, Y., Sawa, A., Moran, T., et al. (2008) A Drosophila model for LRRK2-linked parkinsonism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 105, 2693-2698.
  3. Cestra, G., Toomre, D., Chang, S. and De Camilli, P. (2005) The Abl/Arg substrate ArgBP2/nArgBP2 coordinates the function of multiple regulatory mechanisms converging on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 102, 1731-1736.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcogliese, P. C., Abuaish, S., Kabbach, G., Abdel-Messih, E., Seang, S., Li, G., Slack, R. S., Haque, M. E., Venderova, K., & Park, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • United Arab Emirates University (AE)
  • Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA, USA
Corresponding author
Park, David S.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2017-02-02
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1247-1257
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2583450464
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
LRRK2, Parkinson's disease, dopaminergic neuron loss, eye degeneration, genetic modifiers, suppressor screen, enhancer screen, Drosophila, substantia nigra pars compacta, familial Parkinson's disease, GAL4/UAS system
MeSH terms
Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Drosophila melanogaster, Epistasis, Genetic, Eye Diseases, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Parkinson Disease, Substantia Nigra, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Drosophila Proteins, Mice, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review