The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective, longitudinal study of emotions and relationships in in- vitro fertilization treatment
Open accessAbstract
Emotional and relationship assessments were completed by 144 couples at intake for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and 6 months after either the identification of pregnancy or the discontinuation of treatment following three unsuccessful cycles. Women also completed emotional assessments at the time of pre-oocyte recovery and post-embryo replacement within each treatment cycle. At intake, women were more anxious than their partners and comparative norms, and were less positive than men about their marital and sexual relationships. Initial emotional assessments were not related to subsequent pregnancy, but at follow-up those who were pregnant were less depressed and more positive about their relationships. Within treatment cycles scores for women were higher after embryo replacement and the failure of pregnancy. First and last treatment cycles were associated with greater anxiety. High levels of confusion and bewilderment found during the initial cycle may indicate the need for better pretreatment information. Services must recognize the presence of high anxiety at intake and provide psychological care for those identified as particularly distressed. Emotional difficulties after failure of IVF treatment can be considered to be iatrogenic effects, and psychological services should be provided to minimize any negative psychological consequences of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? a cohort study
Olivius, C., Friden, B., Borg, G., & Bergh, C. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029 · Cited by 377
Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a review
Eugster, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00386-4 · Cited by 343
Volgsten, H., Skoog Svanberg, A., Ekselius, L., Lundkvist, O., & Sundstrom Poromaa, I. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den154 · Cited by 303
Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): a meta-analysis
Matthiesen, S. M. S., Frederiksen, Y., Ingerslev, H. J., & Zachariae, R. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der246 · Cited by 284
Wischmann, T. (2001) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/16.8.1753 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Slade, P., Emery, J., & Lieberman, B. A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-190
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2143422132
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective, longitudinal study of emotions and relationships in in- vitro fertilization treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/12.1.183
- The paper
- Slade, P., Emery, J., & Lieberman, B. A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of emotions and relationships in in- vitro fertilization treatment. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.1.183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.