The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval
Abstract
A retrospective analysis of results from 114 initiated in-vitro fertilization cycles utilizing pronuclear embryo transfer is presented. Patients were unselected for age or infertility criteria, constituted a continuous series and were grouped according to response to stimulation (Group 1, ideal; Group 2, suboptimal) or ovarian reserve (Group 3, poor). At 16-18 h post-insemination, embryos were scored for alignment of pronuclei and nucleoli and the appearance of the cytoplasm, generating an embryo score (ES). Transfers were performed 24-26 h post-insemination using two to six embryos with the highest ES. A corrected score was calculated (total score/number of embryos; CS). A total of 114 initiated cycles resulted in 97 oocyte retrievals with 38 clinical pregnancies (39%; 15% implantation). Pregnancy rates were significantly different between the three groups; 37 pregnancies in Group 1 (55% clinical pregnancy; 20% implantation), none in Group 2 and one in Group 3 (6%; 2% implantation: P < 0.001). The ES of transferred embryos correlated with groups. There was a strong correlation between CS and implantation and delivery rates. CS >15 resulted in a 28% implantation; 65% delivery rate. CS <14 resulted in four pregnancies, one delivered. The data show that oocyte quality and pronuclear embryo morphology are related to implantation and that pronuclear embryos can be successfully selected for embryo transfer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677
Cited by
Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer
Gardner, D. K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5 · Cited by 2,091
Culture and transfer of human blastocysts
Gardner, D. K., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (1999) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1097/00001703-199906000-00013 · Cited by 895
Gerris, J., De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., Van Royen, E., Van de Meerssche, M., & Valkenburg, M. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.10.2581 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, L. A., & Smith, S.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1003-1013
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2162259560
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/13.4.1003
- The paper
- Scott, L. A., & Smith, S. (1998). The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.4.1003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.