Cited by 114Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesReproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disorders

Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix in healthy female volunteers

Duijkers, I. J., Klipping, C., Willemsen, W. N., Krone, D., Schneider, E., Niebch, G., Hermann, R.·1998·Human Reproduction

Abstract

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix is in advanced clinical development for the control of endogenous gonadotrophin secretion during the course of a fertility programme. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Cetrorelix following single and multiple s.c. administration of different doses. Thirty-six healthy female volunteers received either 0.25, 0.50 or 1.00 mg Cetrorelix, in a first menstrual cycle as single dose and in a second cycle as multiple dose (daily between cycle days 3 and 16). Frequent blood samples were collected for determination of Cetrorelix, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), oestradiol and progesterone concentrations. Follicular growth was measured by transvaginal ultrasonography. After single administration of each dose, maximum Cetrorelix concentrations (Cmax) were reached after 1 h, and Cmax and area under curve (AUC) increased linearly with the dose. The median terminal half-life ranged from 5 to 10 h in the three different dose groups. FSH, LH, oestradiol and progesterone concentrations were suppressed, with a nadir at 6-12 h after Cetrorelix administration. During multiple administration, Cmax and AUC also showed dose-linearity. The median terminal half-life of Cetrorelix varied between 20 and 80 h. A dose-dependent suppression of FSH, LH and oestradiol concentrations was observed during treatment. After multiple administration, ovulation was delayed for 5, 10 and 13 days in the 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00 mg dose groups, respectively. In conclusion, Cetrorelix showed linear pharmacokinetics, and effectively delayed the LH surge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/13.9.2392

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A modified menstrual cycle model based on the Margolskee 2011 model was used with optimal control theory to determine the minimum total exogenous estrogen/progesterone dose and timing of administration to induce anovulation.

    “Utilized optimal control theory on a modified menstrual cycle model (based on Margolskee 2011 model) to determine the minimum total exogenous estrogen/progesterone dose and timing of administration to induce anovulation (absence of ovulation)”

    From A Survey of Mathematical Modeling of Hormonal Contraception and the Menstrual Cycle (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that ovulation was postponed, not prevented. The paper reports an experiment administering Cetrorelix to healthy volunteers, rather than using optimal control of exogenous estrogen and progesterone to induce anovulation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duijkers, I. J., Klipping, C., Willemsen, W. N., Krone, D., Schneider, E., Niebch, G., & Hermann, R.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
2392-2398
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2133484074
Cited by
114
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
cetrorelix, GnRH antagonist, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dose linearity, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone, ovulation delay, fertility control, folliculogenesis, healthy female volunteers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Hormone Antagonists, Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Ovulation Induction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review