Cited by 139Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesUrological Disorders and Treatments

Acephalic spermatozoa and abnormal development of the head–neck attachment: a human syndrome of genetic origin

Chemes, H.E., Puigdomenech, E.T., Carizza, C., Olmedo, S. Brugo, Zanchetti, F., Hermes, R.·1999·Human Reproduction

Abstract

A series of 10 young sterile men with acephalic spermatozoa or abnormal head-mid-piece attachments is presented. Nine of these patients had 75-100% spermatozoa with minute cephalic ends and 0-25% abnormal head-middle piece attachments. Loose heads ranged between 0-35 for each 100 spermatozoa and normal forms were rare. Two patients were brothers. On ultrastructural examination, the head was generally absent and the middle piece was covered by the plasma membrane. When present, heads implanted at abnormal angles on the middle piece. A testicular biopsy showed abnormal spermiogenesis. The implantation fossa was absent and the flagellar anlage developed independently from the nucleus, resulting in abnormal head-middle piece connections. In one patient azoospermia was induced with testosterone to attempt to increase the normal sperm clone during the rebound phenomenon, but all newly formed spermatozoa were acephalic. In another patient with high numbers of defective head-mid-piece connections, microinjections of spermatozoa resulted in four fertilized oocytes, but syngamy and cleavage did not take place, suggesting an abnormal function of the centrioles. The findings indicate that acephalic spermatozoa arise in the testis as the result of an abnormal neck development during spermiogenesis. The familial incidence and the typical phenotype strongly suggest a genetic origin of the syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/14.7.1811

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chemes, H. E., Puigdomenech, E. T., Carizza, C., Olmedo, S. B., Zanchetti, F., & Hermes, R.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1999-07
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
1811-1818
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2123749757
Cited by
139
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
male infertility, azoospermia, spermiogenesis, sperm ultrastructure, genetic syndromes, familial inheritance, sperm microinjection, fertilization failure
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Microinjections, Microscopy, Electron, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Phenotype, Sperm Head, Spermatogenesis, Spermatozoa, Syndrome, Testis, Zygote

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review