The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromosome translocations in couples with in-vitro fertilization implantation failure
Open accessAbstract
Recurrent miscarriage is known to be associated with parental chromosomal abnormalities, particularly balanced reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that couples with in-vitro fertilization (IVF) implantation failure, like those with recurrent miscarriage, have a higher than expected prevalence of translocations which may impact on pregnancy outcome. Patients who previously had at least 10 embryos transferred without achieving clinical pregnancy were evaluated for chromosome abnormalities as part of screening investigations for implantation failure. Recurrent miscarriage patients with a history of at least three consecutive first-trimester abortions were also tested. Results were compared to reports of infertility patients presenting for treatment and population neonatal screening programmes. Chromosomal abnormalities overall were detected in 13/514 individuals with implantation failure (2.5%), and 15/319 individuals with recurrent miscarriage (4. 7%). Translocations (reciprocal and Robertsonian) were found in 7/514 individuals (1.4%) and 7/219 couples (3.2%) with implantation failure (P < 0.0005 compared with infertile controls and P < 0.0001 compared with screened neonates). Translocations were found in 13/319 individuals (4.1%) and 12/130 couples (9.2%) with recurrent miscarriage. Balanced parental translocations may be implicated in the pathogenesis of IVF-implantation failure. Genetic evaluation should be considered as part of the investigation of these patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nielsen, J., & Wohlert, M. (1991) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01213097 · Cited by 1,193
Cited by
Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations
Munné, S., Sandalinas, M., Escudero, T., Fung, J., Gianaroli, L., & Cohen, J. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00495-7 · Cited by 361
Kohn, T. P., Kohn, J. R., Darilek, S., Ramasamy, R., & Lipshultz, L. (2016) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-016-0702-8 · Cited by 65
Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity
Saad, F. A., & Jauniaux, E. (2002) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61620-3 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Stern, C., Pertile, M., Norris, H., Hale, L., & Baker, H. W. G.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2097-2101
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2129954469
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromosome translocations in couples with in-vitro fertilization implantation failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/14.8.2097
- The paper
- Stern, C., Pertile, M., Norris, H., Hale, L., & Baker, H. W. G. (1999). Chromosome translocations in couples with in-vitro fertilization implantation failure. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.8.2097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.