The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children
Abstract
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with ejaculated, epididymal or testicular spermatozoa was first successful in 1992 and has since become the widely accepted treatment for couples with severe male-factor infertility. The outcome of several thousands of ICSI cycles in terms of fertilization, embryo cleavage and implantation is similar to that for conventional in-vitro fertilization in couples with tubal or idiopathic infertility. To evaluate the important issue of safety of the new technique of ICSI, a prospective follow-up study of 1987 children born after ICSI was carried out. The aim was to compile data on karyotypes, congenital malformations, growth parameters and developmental milestones. Parents' agreement to genetic counselling was obtained as well as prenatal diagnosis, followed by a physical examination of the children at 2 months, 1 year and 2 years. Between April 1991 and August 1997, 1699, 91 and 118 children were born after ICSI with ejaculated, epididymal and testicular spermatozoa respectively; 79 children were born from cryopreserved ICSI embryos. In all, 1082 karyotypes were determined by prenatal diagnosis, 18 of which were abnormal and de novo (1.66%) (nine each of autosomal and sex chromosomal aberrations), and 10 karyotypes (0.92%) were inherited structural aberrations. Of these, nine (eight balanced structural aberrations and one unbalanced trisomy 21) were transmitted from the father. Ten pregnancies were terminated after prenatal karyotyping or DNA testing. Forty-six major malformations (2.3%) were observed at birth. Seven malformations, observed by prenatal ultrasound, were terminated. Twenty-one (1.1 %) stillbirths, including four with major malformations, occurred later than 20 weeks of pregnancy. Mean gestational age at birth was 38.7 weeks for singletons, 36.0 weeks for twins and 32.0 weeks for triplets. No specifically higher incidence of malformations was found in any given subgroup.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nielsen, J., & Wohlert, M. (1991) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01213097 · Cited by 1,193
Cited by
ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: data collection III (May 2001)
ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.1.233 · Cited by 256
Do morphological anomalies reflect chromosomal aneuploidies?*: Case Report
Viville, S., Mollard, R., Bach, M.-L., Falquet, C., Gerlinger, P., & Warter, S. (2000) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/15.12.2563 · Cited by 129
Kihaile, P. E., Misumi, J., Hirotsuru, K., Kumasako, Y., Kisanga, R. E., & Utsunomiya, T. (2003) · International Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2003.00391.x · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonduelle, M., Camus, M., De Vos, A., Staessen, C., Tournaye, H., Van Assche, E., Verheyen, G., Devroey, P., Liebaers, I., & Van Steirteghem, A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- 243-264
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2118068788
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_1.243
- The paper
- Bonduelle, M., Camus, M., De Vos, A., Staessen, C., Tournaye, H., Van Assche, E., Verheyen, G., Devroey, P., Liebaers, I., & Van Steirteghem, A. (1999). Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_1.243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.