Cited by 36Reproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and TechnologiesSperm and Testicular Function

Comparison of sibling oocyte outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in severe teratozoospermic patients in the first cycle

Open access
Kihaile, Paul E., Misumi, Junichi, Hirotsuru, Keiko, Kumasako, Yoko, Kisanga, Ramzy E., Utsunomiya, Takafumi·2003·International Journal of Andrology

Abstract

Summary: To follow up the outcome of sibling oocytes subjected to both conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the first cycles of severe teratozoospermic patients with normal sperm morphology (NSM)≤4%, a total of 1193 sibling metaphase II oocytes (MII) in 85 cycles were randomly allocated into two groups: 588 underwent IVF and 605 ICSI and the embryo outcomes between the two groups were compared. The fertilization rate was significantly higher in the ICSI groups than in the IVF group (p < 0.05) and fertilization failure rate in the ICSI group (2.3%) was lower than in the IVF group (28.2%). Subsequently, the rates of embryo arrest as well as grade 1 and 2 embryo formation before day 3, ≥6 cell embryos on day 3 and blastocyst formation on days 5 and 6, did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was a trend towards a high pregnancy rate cycle in mixed ICSI/IVF embryo transfer (ET) (49.1%). In conclusion, this study showed that in couples with only severe teratozoospermia, there was a benefit in subjecting sibling oocytes to both IVF and ICSI in the first cycle because 24 (28.2%) cycles of total fertilization failure were avoided. Furthermore, despite initially significant higher fertilization rates in ICSI than IVF oocytes, subsequent rates of development from ≥6 cells up to blastocyst stage were the same suggesting that ICSI should be used with caution, as after day 3, ICSI‐derived embryo development was compromised compared with IVF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2003.00391.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerning fertilisation rate, one of the two randomised oocyte cohort studies found no significant impact on fertilisation rates, whereas the other observed higher fertilisation rates with ICSI than with IVF (72.6% vs 44.1%, p < 0.05).

    “Concerning fertilisation rate, one of this two found no significant impact on fertilisation rates [104], whereas the other observed higher fertilisation rates with ICSI than with IVF (72.6% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.05) [105].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bowen, J. R., Gibson, F. L., Leslie, G., I. & Saunders, D. M. (1998) Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (see comments). Lancet 15, 352: 578-579.
  2. Liu, D. Y. & Baker, H. W. G. (1992) Morphology of spermatozoa bound to zona pellucida of human oocytes that failed to fertilize. Journal of Reproductive Fertility 94, 71-84.
  3. Takano, Y., Kihaile, P. E. & Utsunomiya, T. (1999) The effect of sperm morphology evaluation using strict criterion. Japan Journal of Fertility Sterility 44, 1-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kihaile, P. E., Misumi, J., Hirotsuru, K., Kumasako, Y., Kisanga, R. E., & Utsunomiya, T.
Affiliations
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ)
Corresponding author
Kihaile, Paul E.
Venue
International Journal of Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-10
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
57-62
ISSN
  • 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2605
OpenAlex
W1990924057
Cited by
36
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
Keywords
intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization, sibling oocytes, fertilization rate, fertilization failure, embryonic development, blastocyst development, embryo transfer, pregnancy rate, male infertility
MeSH terms
Blastomeres, Cytoplasm, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Male, Microinjections, Oligospermia, Oocytes, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Spermatozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review