Ovarian response to repeated controlled stimulation in in-vitro fertilization cycles in patients with ovarian endometriosis
Abstract
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is an effective infertility treatment for women with endometriosis, but most women need to undergo several cycles of treatment to become pregnant. This case-control study was designed to assess how consistently women with ovarian endometriosis respond to ovarian stimulation in consecutive treatment cycles compared to women with tubal infertility. We compared outcome measures in 40 women with a history of surgically confirmed ovarian endometriosis and 80 women with tubal infertility, all of whom had at least three IVF treatment cycles. The groups were matched for age and early follicular follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration at their first IVF cycle. Outcome measures included number of follicles, number of oocytes, peak oestradiol concentration and number of FSH ampoules required per follicle. Cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were calculated in both groups. The ovarian endometriosis group had a significantly poorer ovarian response and required significantly more ampoules of FSH per cycle, a difference that became greater with each subsequent cycle. However, cumulative pregnancy (63.3 versus 62.6% by fifth cycle) and live birth (46.8 versus 50.9% by fifth cycle) rates were similar in both groups. In conclusion, despite decreased ovarian response to FSH, ovarian endometriosis does not decrease the chances of successful IVF treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During ovarian stimulation, women with endometriosis require higher doses of gonadotropin and produce fewer mature oocytes compared to infertile women without endometriosis.
“During ovarian stimulation, women with endometriosis require higher doses of gonadotropin and produce fewer mature oocytes compared to infertile women without endometriosis (Al‐Azemi et al., 2000; Bourdon et al., 2018; González‐Fernández et al., 2011; Muteshi et al., 2018).”
From Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Al‐Azemi et al., 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
<i>Endometriosis and Infertility</i>: <i>Epidemiology and Evidence‐based Treatments</i>
Ozkan, S., Murk, W., & Arici, A. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1434.007 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Garcia-Velasco, J. A., Mahutte, N. G., Corona, J., Zúñiga, V., Gilés, J., Arici, A., & Pellicer, A. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.04.006 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Tsoumpou, I., Kyrgiou, M., Gelbaya, T. A., & Nardo, L. G. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.049 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Streuli, I., de Ziegler, D., Gayet, V., Santulli, P., Bijaoui, G., de Mouzon, J., & Chapron, C. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des274 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Effect of endometrioma cystectomy on IVF outcome: a prospective randomized study
Demirol, A., Guven, S., Baykal, C., & Gurgan, T. (2006) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61192-3 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders
Dinsdale, N. L., & Crespi, B. J. (2021) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.13244 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Ovarian endometriomas and IVF: a retrospective case-control study
Bongioanni, F., Revelli, A., Gennarelli, G., Guidetti, D., Delle Piane, L. D., & Holte, J. (2011) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-9-81 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al-Azemi, M., Bernal, A. L., Steele, J., Gramsbergen, I., Barlow, D., & Kennedy, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- ORCID
- Kennedy, Stephen
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-75
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2127993409
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Keywords
- endometrioma, in vitro fertilization, ovarian response, controlled ovarian stimulation, follicle-stimulating hormone, tubal infertility, cumulative pregnancy rate, live birth rate, repeated IVF cycles, oocyte yield, estradiol
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cell Count, Embryo Transfer, Endometriosis, Estradiol, Fallopian Tube Diseases, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Infertility, Female, Menotropins, Oocytes, Ovarian Diseases, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Nafarelin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review