Cited by 323Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men

Andersen, A.G.·2000·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Male reproductive function seems to have deteriorated considerably during the past 4-5 decades. However, studies of the reproductive function in unselected populations have not previously been reported. As the large majority of young men in Denmark are subjected to a compulsory medical examination for military service, this provided a unique opportunity to study the reproductive function in an unbiased population. Altogether 891 young men delivered a blood sample in which reproductive hormones were measured. From 708 of these men data were also obtained on semen quality and testis size. The median sperm concentration was 41 x 10(6)/ml (mean 57.4 x 10(6)/ml). Men with ejaculation abstinence above 48 h had slightly higher sperm concentrations (median 45 x10(6)/ml, mean 63.2 x 10(6)/ml), but even in this subgroup, 21 and 43% respectively had sperm counts below 20 x 10(6)/ml and 40 x 10(6)/ml. Among men with no history of reproductive diseases and a period of abstinence above 48 h, as many as 18 and 40% respectively had concentrations below 20 and 40 x 10(6)/ml. Sperm counts were positively correlated with testis size, percentage normal spermatozoa and inhibin B, and negatively correlated with percentage immotile spermatozoa and follicle stimulating hormone. Possible causes for this high frequency of young men with suboptimal semen quality are obscure and need to be explored. Whether these findings apply for young male populations of comparable countries remains to be seen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/15.2.366

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous study showed that concentrations of reproductive hormones did not differ between participants and 79% of the non-participants who agreed to have a blood sample drawn in a sub-study.

    “In addition, a previous study showed that concentrations of reproductive hormones did not differ between participants and 79% of the non-participants who agreed to have a blood sample drawn in a sub-study (Andersen et al., 2000).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, A. G.
Affiliations
Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Andersen, A.G.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
366-372
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2154600285
Cited by
323
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
semen quality, sperm concentration, young men, male reproductive function, testicular volume, inhibin B, follicle-stimulating hormone, sperm motility, reproductive hormones, military medical examination
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Male, Semen, Sperm Count, Testis, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review