Cited by 301Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction

Westergaard, L. G.·2000·Human Reproduction

Abstract

The impact of suppressed concentrations of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in 200 consecutive, normogonadotrophic women (couples) was analysed retrospectively. A standard stimulation protocol with mid-luteal gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation and ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was used in all cases. Blood was sampled from each woman on stimulation days 1 and 8 for analysis of oestradiol and LH in serum. A threshold value of serum LH of 0.5 IU/l on stimulation day 8 (S8) was chosen to discriminate between women with low or 'normal' LH concentrations. Low concentrations of LH on S8 (<0.5 IU/l) were found in 49% (98/200) of the women. This group of women was comparable with the normal LH group with regard to pre-treatment clinical parameters, and to the parameters characterizing the stimulation protocol with the exception of serum oestradiol concentration, which on S8 was significantly lower than in the normal LH group (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive pregnancy tests was similar in the two groups (30% versus 34% per started cycle), but the final clinical treatment outcome was significantly different, with a five-fold higher risk of early pregnancy loss (45% versus 9%; P < 0.005) in the low LH group and consequently a significantly poorer chance of delivery than in the normal LH group. It is concluded that a substantial proportion of normogonadotrophic women treated with GnRH agonist down-regulation in combination with FSH, devoid of LH activity, experience LH suppression, which compromises the treatment outcome. Whether these women would benefit from supplementation with recombinant LH or human menopausal gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, remains to be proven in the future by prospective randomized trials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1003

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Westergaard, L. G.
Affiliations
Odense University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Westergaard, L. G.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
1003-1008
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2131053749
Cited by
301
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
luteinizing hormone suppression, early pregnancy loss, ovulation induction, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, GnRH agonist down-regulation, recombinant FSH, estradiol
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Estradiol, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Gonadotropins, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Luteal Phase, Ovary, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Recombinant Proteins, Reference Values, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review